More Like this

1. Performance Evaluation of an Automatic GPS Ionospheric Phase Scintillation Detector Using a Machine-Learning Algorithm: Scintillation detection with machine learning

   https://doi.org/10.1002/navi.188  

   Jiao, Yu ; Hall, John J. ; Morton, Yu T. ( September 2017 , Navigation)
2. Novel scintillation detector design and performance for proton radiography and computed tomography: Novel scintillation detector design for proton imaging

   https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4939255  

   Bashkirov, V. A. ; Schulte, R. W. ; Hurley, R. F. ; Johnson, R. P. ; Sadrozinski, H. F.-W. ; Zatserklyaniy, A. ; Plautz, T. ; Giacometti, V. ( January 2016 , Medical Physics)
3. Nightside High‐Latitude Phase and Amplitude Scintillation During a Substorm Using 1‐Second Scintillation Indices

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2023JA031402  

   Nishimura, Y. ; Kelly, T. ; Jayachandran, P. T. ; Mrak, S. ; Semeter, J. L. ; Donovan, E. F. ; Angelopoulos, V. ; Nishitani, N. ( August 2023 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics)

   We examined evolution of Global Positioning System (GPS) scintillation during a substorm in the nightside high latitude ionosphere, using 1‐s phase and amplitude scintillation indices from the Canadian High Arctic Ionospheric Network (CHAIN) network. The traditional 1‐min scintillation indices showed that the phase scintillation was dominant, while the amplitude scintillation was weak. However, the 1‐s amplitude scintillation occurred more often in association with major auroral structures (polar cap arc, growth phase arc, onset arc, poleward expanding arc, poleward boundary intensification, and diffuse aurora) that were detected by the THEMIS all‐sky imagers (ASIs). The 1‐min index missed much of the amplitude fluctuations because they only lasted ∼10 s near a local peak or at the gradients of the auroral structures. The 1‐s phase scintillation was concurrent with the amplitude scintillation but was much weaker than the 1‐min phase scintillation. The frequency spectral analysis showed that the spectral power above ∼1 Hz was diffractive and below ∼1 Hz was refractive. We suggest that the amplitude scintillation in the high‐latitude ionosphere is much more common than previously considered, and that a short time window of the order of 1 s should be used to detect the scintillation. The 1‐min phase scintillation index is largely influenced by refractive effects due to total electron content (TEC) variations, and the spectral power below ∼1 Hz should be removed to identify diffractive scintillation.

    

   more » « less
4. The variability of low-latitude ionospheric amplitude and phase scintillation detected by a triple-frequency GPS receiver: Variability of Ionospheric Scintillation

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016RS006165  

   de Oliveira Moraes, Alison ; Costa, Emanoel ; Abdu, Mangalathayil Ali ; Rodrigues, Fabiano S. ; de Paula, Eurico Rodrigues ; Oliveira, Kelias ; Perrella, Waldecir João ( April 2017 , Radio Science)
5. GPS phase scintillation at high latitudes during the geomagnetic storm of 17-18 March 2015: GPS Scintillation at High Latitudes

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023171  

   Prikryl, P. ; Ghoddousi-Fard, R. ; Weygand, J. M. ; Viljanen, A. ; Connors, M. ; Danskin, D. W. ; Jayachandran, P. T. ; Jacobsen, K. S. ; Andalsvik, Y. L. ; Thomas, E. G. ; et al ( October 2016 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics)