skip to main content

Title: CUREs in biochemistry-where we are and where we should go: CUREs in Biochemistry
Authors:
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10017932
Journal Name:
Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education
Volume:
45
Issue:
1
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
7 to 12
ISSN:
1470-8175
Publisher:
Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    In this article, we respond to a critique of our earlier work examining the USDA Forest Service’s (USFS’s) planning processes. We appreciate that our critics introduce new data to the discussion of USFS planning. Further data integration is a promising path to developing a deeper understanding of agency activities. Our critics’ analysis largely supports our original claims. Our most important difference is in our conceptualization of the planning process’s relationship to agency goals. Although our critics conceive of the USFS’s legally prescribed planning processes as a barrier to land management activities, we believe that public comment periods, scientific analysis, and land management activities are tools the agency uses to achieve its goals of managing land in the public interest.

    Study Implications: The USDA Forest Service’s current planning process has been critiqued as a barrier to accomplishing land management activities, but it is also an important tool for insuring science-based management and understanding public values and interests that the agency is legally bound to uphold.

  2. Abstract. Despite the centrality of the water balance equation to hydrology and waterresources, in 2018 we still lack adequate empirical observations ofconsumptive use of water by humans and their economy. It is therefore worthconsidering what we can do with the withdrawal-based water use data wealready possess, and what future water census measurements would be requiredto more accurately quantify consumptive use for the most common mesoscale usecases. The limitations of the currently applied simple net consumptive use(SNCU) assumptions are discussed for several common use cases. Fortunately,several applied water management, economics, and policy questions can besufficiently addressed using currently available withdrawal numbers in placeof water consumption numbers. This discussion clarifies the broadrequirements for an improved “stock and flow” census-scale data model forconsumptive water use. While we are waiting for the eventual arrival of amore sophisticated water census, the withdrawal data we already possess aresufficient for some of our most important scientific and applied purposes.