More Like this

1. An Optimal Transport Formulation of Bayes’ Law for Nonlinear Filtering Algorithms

   https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC51059.2022.9992776  

   Taghvaei, Amirhossein ; Hosseini, Bamdad ( January 2023 , 2022 IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC))
2. Pressure-Dependent Rate Constant Caused by Tunneling Effects: OH + HNO 3 as an Example

   https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.0c00733  

   Nguyen, Thanh Lam ; Stanton, John F. ( May 2020 , The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters)
3. High-Pressure/Temperature Behavior of the Alkali/Calcium Carbonate Shortite (Na 2 Ca 2 (CO 3 ) 3 ): Implications for Carbon Sequestration in Earth's Transition Zone

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015846  

   Vennari, Cara E. ; Beavers, Christine M. ; Williams, Quentin ( August 2018 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth)
4. N supply mediates the radiative balance of N 2 O emissions and CO 2 sequestration driven by N‐fixing vs. non‐fixing trees

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ecy.3414  

   Kou‐Giesbrecht, Sian ; Funk, Jennifer L. ; Perakis, Steven S. ; Wolf, Amelia A. ; Menge, Duncan N. L. ( July 2021 , Ecology)

   Forests are a significant CO₂sink. However, CO₂sequestration in forests is radiatively offset by emissions of nitrous oxide (N₂O), a potent greenhouse gas, from forest soils. Reforestation, an important strategy for mitigating climate change, has focused on maximizing CO₂sequestration in plant biomass without integrating N₂O emissions from soils. Although nitrogen (N)‐fixing trees are often recommended for reforestation because of their rapid growth on N‐poor soil, they can stimulate significant N₂O emissions from soils. Here, we first used a field experiment to show that a N‐fixing tree (Robinia pseudoacacia) initially mitigated climate change more than a non‐fixing tree (Betula nigra). We then used our field data to parameterize a theoretical model to investigate these effects over time. Under lower N supply, N‐fixers continued to mitigate climate change more than non‐fixers by overcoming N limitation of plant growth. However, under higher N supply, N‐fixers ultimately mitigated climate change less than non‐fixers by enriching soil N and stimulating N₂O emissions from soils. These results have implications for reforestation, suggesting that N‐fixing trees are more effective at mitigating climate change at lower N supply, whereas non‐fixing trees are more effective at mitigating climate change at higher N supply.

    

   more » « less
5. Expert elicitation of the timing and uncertainty to establish a geologic sequestration well for CO 2 in the United States

   https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2307984120  

   Moore, Emily J. ; Karplus, Valerie J. ; Morgan, M. Granger ( January 2024 , Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

   Many studies anticipate that carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) will be essential to decarbonizing the U.S. economy. However, prior work has not estimated the time required to develop, approve, and implement a geologic sequestration site in the United States. We generate such an estimate by identifying six clearance points that must be passed before a sequestration site can become operational. For each clearance point (CP), we elicit expert judgments of the time required in the form of probability distributions and then use stochastic simulation to combine and sum the results. We find that, on average, there is a 90% chance that the time required lies between 5.5 and 9.6 y, with an upper bound of 12 y. Even using the most optimistic expert judgements, the lower bound on time is 2.7 y, and the upper bound is 8.3 y. Using the most pessimistic judgements, the lower bound is 3.5 y and the upper bound is 19.2 y. These estimates suggest that strategies must be found to safely accelerate the process. We conclude the paper by discussing seven potential strategies. 

   more » « less