skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Thursday, February 13 until 2:00 AM ET on Friday, February 14 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Defensive mutualisms: do microbial interactions within hosts drive the evolution of defensive traits?
Award ID(s):
1045608
PAR ID:
10022367
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Functional Ecology
Volume:
28
Issue:
2
ISSN:
0269-8463
Page Range / eLocation ID:
356 to 363
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    In many animal species, individuals engage in fights with conspecifics over access to limited resources (e.g. mates, food, or shelter). Most theory about these intraspecific fights assumes that damage has an important role in determining the contest winner. Thus, defensive structures that reduce the amount of damage an individual accrues during intraspecific competition should provide a fighting advantage.

    Examples of such damage‐reducing structures include the dermal shields of goats, the dorsal osteoderms of crocodiles, and the armoured telsons of mantis shrimps. Although numerous studies have identified these defensive structures, no study has investigated whether they influence the outcomes of intraspecific fights.

    Here we investigated whether inhibiting damage by enhancing an individual's armour influenced fighting behaviour and success in the giant mesquite bug,Thasus neocalifornicus(Insecta: Hemiptera: Coreidae).

    We found that experimentally manipulated individuals (i.e. those provided with additional armour) were 1.6 times more likely to win a fight when compared to the control. These results demonstrate that damage, and damage‐reducing structures, can influence fighting success.

    The implications of these results are twofold. First, our results experimentally support a fundamental assumption of most theoretical fighting models: that damage is a fighting cost that can influence contest outcomes. Second, these results highlight the importance of an individual's defensive capacity, and why defence should not be ignored.

    A freePlain Language Summarycan be found within the Supporting Information of this article.

     
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. While many vulnerabilities are often related to computing and network systems, there has been a growing number of vulnerabilities and attacks in software systems. They are generally caused by careless software design and implementations, and not putting sufficient effort into eliminating defects and flaws in the software itself. When it comes to building reliable and secure software, it is critical that security must be considered throughout the software development process. This paper presents a series of modules that are designed to introduce security concepts in beginners programming courses. The modules have been developed to teach the fundamental concepts of defensive programming from the freshman year, to ensure that the programming concepts are taught to beginning programmers from a security perspective. These modules are intended to build a strong cybersecurity foundation, which will then be enhanced further in the advanced courses, such as Secure Applications Programming and Secure Software Engineering courses. Both instructors and students can practice defensive programming with these modules in their classroom. The study plans to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of the modules associated with the Model-Eliciting Activity (MEA), an evidence-based teaching and learning methodology. 
    more » « less
  4. Defensive behaviors reflect underlying emotion states, such as fear. The hypothalamus plays a role in such behaviors, but prevailing textbook views depict it as an effector of upstream emotion centers, such as the amygdala, rather than as an emotion center itself. We used optogenetic manipulations to probe the function of a specific hypothalamic cell type that mediates innate defensive responses. These neurons are sufficient to drive multiple defensive actions, and required for defensive behaviors in diverse contexts. The behavioral consequences of activating these neurons, moreover, exhibit properties characteristic of emotion states in general, including scalability, (negative) valence, generalization and persistence. Importantly, these neurons can also condition learned defensive behavior, further refuting long-standing claims that the hypothalamus is unable to support emotional learning and therefore is not an emotion center. These data indicate that the hypothalamus plays an integral role to instantiate emotion states, and is not simply a passive effector of upstream emotion centers.

     
    more » « less