Garnet‐type Li7La3Zr2O12(LLZO) solid‐state electrolytes hold great promise for the next‐generation all‐solid‐state batteries. An in‐depth understanding of the phase transformation during synthetic processes is required for better control of the crystallinity and improvement of the ionic conductivity of LLZO. Herein, the phase transformation pathways and the associated surface amorphization are comparatively investigated during the sol–gel and solid‐state syntheses of LLZO using in situ heating transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The combined ex situ X‐ray diffraction and in situ TEM techniques are used to reveal two distinct phase transformation pathways (precursors → La2Zr2O7 → LLZO and precursors → LLZO) and the subsequent layer‐by‐layer crystal growth of LLZO on the atomic scale. It is also demonstrated that the surface amorphization surrounding the LLZO crystals is sensitive to the postsynthesis cooling rate and significantly affects the ionic conductivity of pelletized LLZO. This work brings up a critical but often overlooked issue that may greatly exacerbate the Li‐ion conductivity by undesired synthetic conditions, which can be leveraged to ameliorate the overall crystallinity to improve the electrochemical performance of LLZO. These findings also shed light on the significance of optimizing surface structure to ensure superior performance of Li‐ion conductors.
Polymer–ceramic composite electrolytes are emerging as a promising solution to deliver high ionic conductivity, optimal mechanical properties, and good safety for developing high‐performance all‐solid‐state rechargeable batteries. Composite electrolytes have been prepared with cubic‐phase Li7La3Zr2O12(LLZO) garnet and polyethylene oxide (PEO) and employed in symmetric lithium battery cells. By combining selective isotope labeling and high‐resolution solid‐state Li NMR, we are able to track Li ion pathways within LLZO‐PEO composite electrolytes by monitoring the replacement of7Li in the composite electrolyte by6Li from the6Li metal electrodes during battery cycling. We have provided the first experimental evidence to show that Li ions favor the pathway through the LLZO ceramic phase instead of the PEO‐LLZO interface or PEO. This approach can be widely applied to study ion pathways in ionic conductors and to provide useful insights for developing composite materials for energy storage and harvesting.
more » « less- PAR ID:
- 10029052
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Angewandte Chemie
- Volume:
- 128
- Issue:
- 40
- ISSN:
- 0044-8249
- Format(s):
- Medium: X Size: p. 12726-12730
- Size(s):
- p. 12726-12730
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract All‐solid‐state batteries have the potential for enhanced safety and capacity over conventional lithium ion batteries, and are anticipated to dominate the energy storage industry. As such, strategies to enable recycling of the individual components are crucial to minimize waste and prevent health and environmental harm. Here, we use cold sintering to reprocess solid‐state composite electrolytes, specifically Mg and Sr doped Li7La3Zr2O12with polypropylene carbonate (PPC) and lithium perchlorate (LLZO−PPC−LiClO4). The low sintering temperature allows co‐sintering of ceramics, polymers and lithium salts, leading to re‐densification of the composite structures with reprocessing. Reprocessed LLZO−PPC−LiClO4exhibits densified microstructures with ionic conductivities exceeding 10−4 S/cm at room temperature after 5 recycling cycles. All‐solid‐state lithium batteries fabricated with reprocessed electrolytes exhibit a high discharge capacity of 168 mA h g−1at 0.1 C, and retention of performance at 0.2 C for over 100 cycles. Life cycle assessment (LCA) suggests that recycled electrolytes outperforms the pristine electrolyte process in all environmental impact categories, highlighting cold sintering as a promising technology for recycling electrolytes.
-
more » « less
Abstract In this report, a facile wet chemical method using acetonitrile combined with thermal annealing was used to prepare Li2S‐P2S5(LPS) based glass‐ceramic electrolytes with (1 wt%, 3 wt%, and 5 wt% Ce2S3) and without Ce2S3doping. The crystal structure, ionic conductivity, and chemical stability of Li7P3S11glass‐ceramic electrolytes were examined at varying temperatures (250–350°C). The results indicated that the highest ionic conductivity of 3.15 × 10−4S cm−1for pure Li7P3S11was observed at a temperature of 325°C. By incorporating 1 wt% Ce2S3and subjecting it to a heat treatment at 250°C, the glass ceramic electrolyte attained a remarkable ionic conductivity of 7.7 × 10−4(S cm−1) at 25°C. Furthermore, it exhibited a stable and extensive electrochemical potential range, reaching up to 5 volts when compared to the Li/Li+reference electrode. By tuning the glass transition and crystallization temperature, cerium doping seems to make Li7P3S11more chemically stable, compared to its original 70Li2S‐30P2S5counterpart. According to Raman and X‐ray photoelectron spectroscopy analyses, cerium doping inhibits the decomposition of highly conductive P2S74‐(pyro‐thiophosphate) to PS43−and P2S64−. Doped LPS has a greater crystallinity and more uniform microstructure than pure LPS, according to XRD, Raman spectroscopy, and scanning electron microscopy analysis. Consequently, Li7P2.9Ce0.1S11electrolyte shows great potential as a solid‐state electrolyte for constructing high‐performance sulfide‐based all‐solid‐state batteries.
-
more » « less
Abstract Localized atomistic disorder in halide‐based solid electrolytes (SEs) can be leveraged to boost Li+mobility. In this study, Li+transport in structurally modified Li3HoCl6, via Br−introduction and Li+deficiency, is explored. The optimized Li3‐3
y Ho1+y Cl6‐x Brx achieves an ionic conductivity of 3.8 mS cm−1at 25 °C, the highest reported for holmium halide materials.6,7Li nuclear magnetic resonance and relaxometry investigations unveil enhanced ion dynamics with bromination, attaining a Li+motional rate neighboring 116 MHz. X‐ray diffraction analyses reveal mixed‐anion‐induced phase transitions with disproportionate octahedral expansions and distortions, creating Ho‐free planes with favorable energetics for Li+migration. Bond valence site energy analysis highlights preferred Li+transport pathways, particularly in structural planes devoid of Ho3+blocking effects. Molecular dynamics simulations corroborate enhanced Li+diffusion with Br−introduction into Li3HoCl6. Li‐Ho electrostatic repulsions in the (001) plane presumably drive Li+diffusion into the Ho‐free (002) layer, enabling rapid intraplanar Li+motion and exchange between the 2d and 4h sites. Li3‐3y Ho1+y Cl6‐x Brx also demonstrates good battery cycling stability. These findings offer valuable insights into the intricate correlations between structure and ion transport and will help guide the design of high‐performance fast ion conductors for all‐solid‐state batteries. -
more » « less
Abstract A thin solid electrolyte with a high Li+conductivity is used to separate the metallic lithium anode and the cathode in an all‐solid‐state Li‐metal battery. However, most solid Li‐ion electrolytes have a small electrochemical stability window, large interfacial resistance, and cannot block lithium‐dendrite growth when lithium is plated on charging of the cell. Mg2+stabilizes a rhombohedral NASICON‐structured solid electrolyte of the formula Li1.2Mg0.1Zr1.9(PO4)3(LMZP). This solid electrolyte has Li‐ion conductivity two orders of magnitude higher at 25 °C than that of the triclinic LiZr2(PO4)3.7Li and6Li NMR confirm the Li‐ions in two different crystallographic sites of the NASICON framework with 85% of the Li‐ions having a relatively higher mobility than the other 15%. The anode–electrolyte interface is further investigated with symmetric Li/LMZP/Li cell testing, while the cathode–electrolyte interface is explored with an all‐solid‐state Li/LMZP/LiFePO4cell. The enhanced performance of these cells enabled by the Li1.2Mg0.1Zr1.9(PO4)3solid electrolyte is stable upon repeated charge/discharge cycling.
