More Like this

1. A New Measure of Students’ Perceived Conflict between Evolution and Religion (PCoRE) Is a Stronger Predictor of Evolution Acceptance than Understanding or Religiosity

   https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-02-0024  

   Barnes, M. Elizabeth ; Supriya, K. ; Zheng, Yi ; Roberts, Julie A. ; Brownell, Sara E. ( September 2021 , CBE—Life Sciences Education)

   Price, Rebecca (Ed.)

   Evolution is controversial among students and religiosity, religious affiliation, understanding of evolution, and demographics are predictors of evolution acceptance. However, quantitative research has not explored the unique impact of student perceived conflict between their religion and evolution as a major factor influencing evolution acceptance. We developed an instrument with validity evidence called “Perceived Conflict between Evolution and Religion” (PCoRE). Using this measure, we find that, among students in 26 biology courses in 11 states, adding student perceived conflict between their religion and evolution to linear mixed models more than doubled the capacity of the models to predict evolution acceptance compared with models that only included religiosity, religious affiliation, understanding of evolution, and demographics. Student perceived conflict between evolution and their religion was the strongest predictor of evolution acceptance among all variables and mediated the impact of religiosity on evolution acceptance. These results build upon prior literature that suggests that reducing perceived conflict between students’ religious beliefs and evolution can help raise evolution acceptance levels. Further, these results indicate that including measures of perceived conflict between religion and evolution in evolution acceptance studies in the future is important. 

   more » « less
2. Is Religiosity a Barrier to Organ Donations? Examining the Role of Religiosity and the Salience of a Religious Context on Organ-Donation Decisions

   https://doi.org/10.1086/718459  

   Harel, Inbal ; Mayorga, Marcus ; Slovic, Paul ; Kogut, Tehila ( April 2022 , Journal of the Association for Consumer Research)
3. Location of intense electromagnetic ion cyclotron (EMIC) wave events relative to the plasmapause: Van Allen Probes observations: EMIC WAVES RELATIVE TO THE PLASMAPAUSE

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JA023392  

   Tetrick, S. S. ; Engebretson, M. J. ; Posch, J. L. ; Olson, C. N. ; Smith, C. W. ; Denton, R. E. ; Thaller, S. A. ; Wygant, J. R. ; Reeves, G. D. ; MacDonald, E. A. ; et al ( April 2017 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics)
4. Religiosity Moderates the Link Between Environmental Beliefs and Pro-Environmental Support: The Role of Belief in a Controlling God

   https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220948712  

   Eom, Kimin ; Saad, Carmel S. ; Kim, Heejung S. ( June 2021 , Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin)

   null (Ed.)

   The current research examines differences in what motivates environmentally sustainable behavior between more and less religious people in the United States. We found that religiosity moderates the extent to which environmental beliefs predict pro-environmental support. Specifically, environmental beliefs predicted pro-environmental support less strongly among more religious people than less religious people (Studies 1 and 2). Using a correlational (Study 2) and an experimental (Study 3) design, we further found that one particular aspect of religiosity—believing in a controlling god—reduced the importance of personally held environmental beliefs in shaping one’s support for pro-environmental actions. Our findings suggest that motivation to act based on personal beliefs may be attenuated among people who are religious because they believe in an external source of control. Sociocultural factors, such as religion, shape the psychological underpinnings of social actions, and the present research underscores the importance of understanding psychological diversity in promoting support toward environmental sustainability. 

   more » « less
5. Religiosity and identity interference among graduate students in the sciences

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2020.102503  

   Scheitle, Christopher P. ; Dabbs, Ellory ( January 2021 , Social Science Research)

   null (Ed.)