- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10040316
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
- Volume:
- 42
- Issue:
- 11
- ISSN:
- 0197-9337
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1652 to 1665
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract The potentially important influence of climate change on landscape evolution and on critical zone processes is not sufficiently understood. The relative contribution of hydro‐climatic factors on hillslope erosion rates may significantly vary with topography at the watershed scale. The objective of this study is to quantify the hydro‐geomorphic behavior of two contrasting landscapes in response to different climate change scenarios in the Luquillo Critical Zone Observatory, a site of particular geomorphological interest, in terms of hillslope erosion and rainfall‐triggered landslides. We investigate the extent to which hillslope erosion and landslide occurrence remain relatively invariant with future hydro‐climatic perturbations. The adjacent Mameyes and Icacos watersheds are studied, which are underlain by contrasting lithologies. A high resolution coupled hydro‐geomorphic model based on tRIBS (Triangulated Irregular Network‐based Real‐time Integrated Basin Simulator) is used. Observations of landslide activity and hillslope erosion are used to evaluate the model performance. The process‐based model quantifies feedbacks among different hydrologic processes, landslide occurrence, and topsoil erosion and deposition. Simulations suggest that the propensity for landslide occurrence in the Luquillo Mountains is controlled by tropical storms, subsurface water flow, and by non‐climatic factors, and is expected to remain significant through 2099. The Icacos watershed, which is underlain by quartz diorite, is dominated by relatively large landslides. The relative frequency of smaller landslides is higher at the Mameyes watershed, which is underlain by volcaniclastic rock. While projections of precipitation decrease at the study site may lead to moderate decline in hillslope erosion rates, the simulated erosional potential of the two diverse landscapes likely remains significant. © 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
-
null (Ed.)Abstract The provocative hypothesis that the Shinumo Sandstone in the depths of Grand Canyon was the source for clasts of orthoquartzite in conglomerate of the Sespe Formation of coastal California, if verified, would indicate that a major river system flowed southwest from the Colorado Plateau to the Pacific Ocean prior to opening of the Gulf of California, and would imply that Grand Canyon had been carved to within a few hundred meters of its modern depth at the time of this drainage connection. The proposed Eocene Shinumo-Sespe connection, however, is not supported by detrital zircon nor paleomagnetic-inclination data and is refuted by thermochronology that shows that the Shinumo Sandstone of eastern Grand Canyon was >60 °C (∼1.8 km deep) and hence not incised at this time. A proposed 20 Ma (Miocene) Shinumo-Sespe drainage connection based on clasts in the Sespe Formation is also refuted. We point out numerous caveats and non-unique interpretations of paleomagnetic data from clasts. Further, our detrital zircon analysis requires diverse sources for Sespe clasts, with better statistical matches for the four “most-Shinumo-like” Sespe clasts with quartzites of the Big Bear Group and Ontario Ridge metasedimentary succession of the Transverse Ranges, Horse Thief Springs Formation from Death Valley, and Troy Quartzite of central Arizona. Diverse thermochronologic and geologic data also refute a Miocene river pathway through western Grand Canyon and Grand Wash trough. Thus, Sespe clasts do not require a drainage connection from Grand Canyon or the Colorado Plateau and provide no constraints for the history of carving of Grand Canyon. Instead, abundant evidence refutes the “old” (70–17 Ma) Grand Canyon models and supports a <6 Ma Grand Canyon.more » « less
-
Abstract. The width of valleys and channels affects the hydrology, ecology,and geomorphic functionality of drainage networks. In many studies, thewidth of valleys and/or channels (W) is estimated as a power-law function ofthe drainage area (A), W=kcAd. However, in fluvial systemsthat experience drainage reorganization, abrupt changes in drainage areadistribution can result in valley or channel widths that are disproportionalto their drainage areas. Such disproportionality may be more distinguishedin valleys than in channels due to a longer adjustment timescale forvalleys. Therefore, the valley width–area scaling in reorganized drainagesis expected to deviate from that of drainages that did not experiencereorganization. To explore the effect of reorganization on valley width–drainage areascaling, we studied 12 valley sections in the Negev desert, Israel,categorized into undisturbed, beheaded, and reversed valleys. We found thatthe values of the drainage area exponents, d, are lower in the beheadedvalleys relative to undisturbed valleys but remain positive. Reversedvalleys, in contrast, are characterized by negative d exponents, indicatingvalley narrowing with increasing drainage area. In the reversed category, wealso explored the independent effect of channel slope (S) through theequation W=kbAbSc, which yieldednegative and overall similar values for b and c. A detailed study in one reversed valley section shows that the valleynarrows downstream, whereas the channel widens, suggesting that, ashypothesized, the channel width adjusts faster to post-reorganizationdrainage area distribution. The adjusted narrow channel dictates the widthof formative flows in the reversed valley, which contrasts with the meaningfullywider formative flows of the beheaded valley across the divide. Thisdifference results in a step change in the unit stream power between thereversed and beheaded channels, potentially leading to a “width feedback”that promotes ongoing divide migration and reorganization. Our findings demonstrate that valley width–area scaling is a potential toolfor identifying landscapes influenced by drainage reorganization. Accountingfor reorganization-specific scaling can improve estimations of erosion ratedistributions in reorganized landscapes.more » « less
