More Like this

1. Hydro‐geomorphic behavior of contrasting tropical landscapes and critical zone response to changing climate

   https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4503  

   Dialynas, Yannis G. ; Bras, Rafael L. ( October 2018 , Earth Surface Processes and Landforms)
2. Twentieth century agricultural drainage creates more erosive rivers: TWENTIETH CENTURY AGRICULTURAL DRAINAGE CREATES MORE EROSIVE RIVERS

   https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9738  

   Schottler, Shawn P. ; Ulrich, Jason ; Belmont, Patrick ; Moore, Richard ; Lauer, J. Wesley ; Engstrom, Daniel R. ; Almendinger, James E. ( February 2014 , Hydrological Processes)
3. Evaluating the Shinumo-Sespe drainage connection: Arguments against the “old” (70–17 Ma) Grand Canyon models for Colorado Plateau drainage evolution

   https://doi.org/10.1130/GES02265.1  

   Karlstrom, Karl E. ; Jacobson, Carl E. ; Sundell, Kurt E. ; Eyster, Athena ; Blakey, Ron ; Ingersoll, Raymond V. ; Mulder, Jacob A. ; Young, Richard A. ; Beard, L. Sue ; Holland, Mark E. ; et al ( October 2020 , Geosphere)

   Abstract The provocative hypothesis that the Shinumo Sandstone in the depths of Grand Canyon was the source for clasts of orthoquartzite in conglomerate of the Sespe Formation of coastal California, if verified, would indicate that a major river system flowed southwest from the Colorado Plateau to the Pacific Ocean prior to opening of the Gulf of California, and would imply that Grand Canyon had been carved to within a few hundred meters of its modern depth at the time of this drainage connection. The proposed Eocene Shinumo-Sespe connection, however, is not supported by detrital zircon nor paleomagnetic-inclination data and is refuted by thermochronology that shows that the Shinumo Sandstone of eastern Grand Canyon was >60 °C (∼1.8 km deep) and hence not incised at this time. A proposed 20 Ma (Miocene) Shinumo-Sespe drainage connection based on clasts in the Sespe Formation is also refuted. We point out numerous caveats and non-unique interpretations of paleomagnetic data from clasts. Further, our detrital zircon analysis requires diverse sources for Sespe clasts, with better statistical matches for the four “most-Shinumo-like” Sespe clasts with quartzites of the Big Bear Group and Ontario Ridge metasedimentary succession of the Transverse Ranges, Horse Thief Springs Formation from Deathmore »Valley, and Troy Quartzite of central Arizona. Diverse thermochronologic and geologic data also refute a Miocene river pathway through western Grand Canyon and Grand Wash trough. Thus, Sespe clasts do not require a drainage connection from Grand Canyon or the Colorado Plateau and provide no constraints for the history of carving of Grand Canyon. Instead, abundant evidence refutes the “old” (70–17 Ma) Grand Canyon models and supports a <6 Ma Grand Canyon.« less
4. Seismologically Observed Spatiotemporal Drainage Activity at Moulins: Seismologically observed moulin drainage

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2017JB014578  

   Aso, Naofumi ; Tsai, Victor C. ; Schoof, Christian ; Flowers, Gwenn E. ; Whiteford, Arran ; Rada, Camilo ( November 2017 , Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth)
5. Functional Topology of Evolving Urban Drainage Networks: URBAN DRAINAGE NETWORKS

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2017WR021555  

   Yang, Soohyun ; Paik, Kyungrock ; McGrath, Gavan S. ; Urich, Christian ; Krueger, Elisabeth ; Kumar, Praveen ; Rao, P. Suresh ( November 2017 , Water Resources Research)