The sorting of eukaryotic proteins to various organellar destinations requires receptors that recognize cargo protein targeting signals and facilitate transport into the organelle. One such receptor is the peroxin
Catabolism of fatty acids stored in oil bodies is essential for seed germination and seedling development in Arabidopsis. This fatty acid breakdown occurs in peroxisomes, organelles that sequester oxidative reactions. Import of peroxisomal enzymes is facilitated by peroxins including
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10042013
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley-Blackwell
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Plant Journal
- Volume:
- 92
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 0960-7412
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 110-128
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract PEX 5, which recruits cytosolic cargo carrying a peroxisome‐targeting signal (PTS ) type 1 (PTS 1) for delivery into the peroxisomal lumen (matrix). In plants and mammals,PEX 5 is also indirectly required for peroxisomal import of proteins carrying aPTS 2 signal becausePEX 5 binds thePTS 2 receptor, bringing the associatedPTS 2 cargo to the peroxisome along withPTS 1 cargo. DespitePEX 5 being thePTS 1 cargo receptor, previously identified Arabidopsispex5 mutants display either impairment of bothPTS 1 andPTS 2 import or defects only inPTS 2 import. Here, we report the first Arabidopsispex5 mutant with an exclusivePTS 1 import defect. In addition to markedly diminishedGFP ‐PTS 1 import and decreased pex5‐2 protein accumulation, thispex5‐2 mutant shows typical peroxisome‐related defects, including inefficient β‐oxidation and reduced growth. Growth at reduced or elevated temperatures ameliorated or exacerbatedpex5‐2 peroxisome‐related defects, respectively, without markedly changing pex5‐2 protein levels. In contrast to the diminishedPTS 1 import,PTS 2 processing was only slightly impaired andPTS 2‐GFP import appeared normal inpex5‐2 . This finding suggests that even minor peroxisomal localization of thePTS 1 proteinDEG 15, thePTS 2‐processing protease, is sufficient to maintain robustPTS 2 processing. -
Summary Peroxisomes are dynamic organelles crucial for a variety of metabolic processes during the development of eukaryotic organisms, and are functionally linked to other subcellular organelles, such as mitochondria and chloroplasts. Peroxisomal matrix proteins are imported by peroxins (PEX proteins), yet the modulation of peroxin functions is poorly understood. We previously reported that, besides its known function in chloroplast protein import, the Arabidopsis E3 ubiquitin ligase SP1 (suppressor of ppi1 locus1) also targets to peroxisomes and mitochondria, and promotes the destabilization of the peroxisomal receptor–cargo docking complex components PEX13 and PEX14. Here we present evidence that in Arabidopsis, SP1's closest homolog SP1‐like 1 (SPL1) plays an opposite role to SP1 in peroxisomes. In contrast to
sp1 , loss‐of‐function ofSPL1 led to reduced peroxisomal β‐oxidation activity, and enhanced the physiological and growth defects ofpex14 andpex13 mutants. Transient co‐expression of SPL1 and SP1 promoted each other's destabilization. SPL1 reduced the ability of SP1 to induce PEX13 turnover, and it is the N‐terminus of SP1 and SPL1 that determines whether the protein is able to promote PEX13 turnover. Finally, SPL1 showed prevalent targeting to mitochondria, but rather weak and partial localization to peroxisomes. Our data suggest that these two members of the same E3 protein family utilize distinct mechanisms to modulate peroxisome biogenesis, where SPL1 reduces the function of SP1. Plants and possibly other higher eukaryotes may employ this small family of E3 enzymes to differentially modulate the dynamics of several organelles essential to energy metabolism via the ubiquitin‐proteasome system. -
Summary Light signal provides the spatial and temporal information for plants to adapt to the prevailing environmental conditions. Alterations in light quality and quantity can trigger robust changes in global gene expression. In
Arabidopsis thaliana , two groups of key factors regulating those changes in gene expression areCONSTITUTIVE PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS /DEETIOLATED /FUSCA (COP /DET /FUS ) and a subset of basic helix‐loop‐helix transcription factors calledPHYTOCHROME ‐INTERACTING FACTORS (PIF s). Recently, rapid progress has been made in characterizing the E3 ubiquitin ligases for the light‐induced degradation ofPIF 1,PIF 3 andPIF 4; however, the E3 ligase(s) forPIF 5 remains unknown. Here, we show that theCUL 4COP 1–SPA complex is necessary for the red light‐induced degradation ofPIF 5. Furthermore,COP 1 andSPA proteins stabilizePIF 5 in the dark, but promote the ubiquitination and degradation ofPIF 5 in response to red light through the 26S proteasome pathway. Genetic analysis illustrates that overexpression of can partially suppress bothPIF 5cop1‐4 andspaQ seedling de‐etiolation phenotypes under dark and red‐light conditions. In addition, thePIF 5 protein level cycles under both diurnal and constant light conditions, which is also defective in thecop1‐4 andspaQ backgrounds. Bothcop1‐4 andspaQ show defects in diurnal growth pattern. Overexpression of partially restores growth defects inPIF 5cop1‐4 andspaQ under diurnal conditions, suggesting that theCOP 1–SPA complex plays an essential role in photoperiodic hypocotyl growth, partly through regulating thePIF 5 level. Taken together, our data illustrate how theCUL 4COP 1–SPA E3 ligase dynamically controls thePIF 5 level to regulate plant development. -
Abstract Photorespiration recovers carbon that would be otherwise lost following the oxygenation reaction of rubisco and production of glycolate. Photorespiration is essential in plants and recycles glycolate into usable metabolic products through reactions spanning the chloroplast, mitochondrion, and peroxisome. Catalase in peroxisomes plays an important role in this process by disproportionating H2O2resulting from glycolate oxidation into O2and water. We hypothesize that catalase in the peroxisome also protects against nonenzymatic decarboxylations between hydrogen peroxide and photorespiratory intermediates (glyoxylate and/or hydroxypyruvate). We test this hypothesis by detailed gas exchange and biochemical analysis of
mutants lacking peroxisomal catalase. Our results strongly support this hypothesis, with catalase mutants showing gas exchange evidence for an increased stoichiometry of CO2release from photorespiration, specifically an increase in the CO2compensation point, a photorespiratory‐dependent decrease in the quantum efficiency of CO2assimilation, increase in the12CO2released in a13CO2background, and an increase in the postillumination CO2burst. Further metabolic evidence suggests this excess CO2release occurred via the nonenzymatic decarboxylation of hydroxypyruvate. Specifically, the catalase mutant showed an accumulation of photorespiratory intermediates during a transient increase in rubisco oxygenation consistent with this hypothesis. Additionally, end products of alternative hypotheses explaining this excess release were similar between wild type and catalase mutants. Furthermore, the calculated rate of hydroxypyruvate decarboxylation in catalase mutant is much higher than that of glyoxylate decarboxylation. This work provides evidence that these nonenzymatic decarboxylation reactions, predominately hydroxypyruvate decarboxylation, can occur in vivo when photorespiratory metabolism is genetically disrupted.Arabidopsis thaliana -
Abstract Brassinosteroids (
BRs ) are essential plant growth‐promoting hormones involved in many processes throughout plant development, from seed germination to flowering time. SinceBRs do not undergo long‐distance transport, cell‐ and tissue‐specific regulation of hormone levels involves both biosynthesis and inactivation. To date, tenBR ‐inactivating enzymes, with at least five distinct biochemical activities, have been experimentally identified in the model plantArabidopsis thaliana . Epigenetic interactions betweenT‐DNA insertion alleles and genetic linkage have hindered analysis of higher‐order null mutants in these genes. A previous study demonstrated that thebas1‐2 sob7‐1 ben1‐1 triple‐null mutant could not be characterized due to epigenetic interactions between the exonicT‐DNA insertions inbas1‐2 andsob7‐1, causing the intronicT‐DNA insertion ofben1‐1 to revert to a partial loss‐of‐function allele. We usedCRISPR‐Cas9 genome editing to avoid this problem and generated thebas1‐2 sob7‐1 ben1‐3 triple‐null mutant. This triple‐null mutant resulted in an additive seedling long‐hypocotyl phenotype. We also uncovered a role for ‐mediatedBEN1 BR ‐inactivation in seedling cotyledon petiole elongation that was not observed in the singleben1‐2 null mutant but only in the absence of both andBAS1 . In addition, genetic analysis demonstrated thatSOB7 does not contribute to the early‐flowering phenotype, whichBEN1 andBAS1 redundantly regulate. Our results show thatSOB7 ,BAS1 andBEN1 , have overlapping and independent roles based on their differential spatiotemporal tissue expression patternsSOB7