More Like this

1. Comment to Koschorreck et al.

   https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-2020-307-AC3, 2020  

   Trentman, Matt; Hall, Robert; Blaszozak, Joanna (October 2020, Biogeosciences)

   null (Ed.)
2. Comment on “Climate and agricultural land use change impacts on streamflow in the upper midwestern United States” by Satish C. Gupta et al.: COMMENT ON GUPTA ET AL.

   https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018494  

   Foufoula-Georgiou, Efi; Belmont, Patrick; Wilcock, Peter; Gran, Karen; Finlay, Jacques C.; Kumar, Praveen; Czuba, Jonathan A.; Schwenk, Jon; Takbiri, Zeinab (September 2016, Water Resources Research)
3. Accurately estimating correlations between demographic parameters: A comment on Deane et al. (2023)

   https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.70286  

   Riecke, Thomas V; Gibson, Dan; Sedinger, James S (September 2024, Ecology and Evolution)

   Abstract Estimating correlations among demographic parameters is an important method in population ecology. A recent paper by Deane et al. (Ecology and Evolution13:e9847, 2023) attempted to explore the effects of different priors for covariance matrices on inference when using mark‐recovery data. Unfortunately, Deane et al. (2023) made a mistake when parameterizing some of their models. Rather than exploring the effects of different priors, they examined the effects of the use of incorrect equations on inference. In this manuscript, we clearly describe the mistake in Deane et al. (2023). We then demonstrate the use of an alternative and appropriate method and reach different conclusions regarding the effects of priors on inference. Consistent with other recent literature, informative inverse Wishart priors can lead to flawed inference, while vague priors on covariance matrix components have little impact when sample sizes are adequate. 

   more » « less
4. Dissecting how behavior and environment shape spatial personalities: a comment on Stuber et al.

   https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arac009  

   Spiegel, Orr; Pinter-Wollman, Noa; Simmons, ed., Leigh (February 2022, Behavioral Ecology)
5. Comment on “Resolving the Tropical Pacific/Atlantic Interaction Conundrum” by Feng Jiang et al. (2023)

   https://doi.org/10.1029/2024GL111563  

   Richter, Ingo; Keenlyside, Noel; Tozuka, Tomoki; Okumura, Yuko; Wang, Chunzai; Chang, Ping; Kido, Shoichiro; Tokinaga, Hiroki (December 2024, Geophysical Research Letters)

   Abstract Jiang et al. (2023),https://doi.org/10.1029/2023gl103777argue that the apparent impact of the equatorial Atlantic on El Niño‐Southern Oscillation (ENSO) is a statistical artifact, and that the 6‐month lead correlation reported in previous studies stems from early developing ENSO events driving the equatorial Atlantic zonal mode (AZM) in boreal summer and maturing in winter. Closer examination, however, reveals that most AZM events develop too early to be driven by developing ENSO, and that the influence of decaying ENSO events has to be considered too. Thus, while early developing ENSO events may play a role, they do not fully explain observed AZM behavior. Our aim is not to argue for or against an AZM influence on ENSO, but rather to show that Jiang et al.’s analysis is insufficient to resolve this issue. More analysis will be needed for a deeper understanding of Atlantic‐Pacific interaction. 

   more » « less