Postseismic deformation following subduction earthquakes includes the combined effects of afterslip surrounding the coseismic rupture areas and viscoelastic relaxation in the asthenosphere and provides unique and valuable information for understanding the rheological structure. Because the two postseismic mechanisms are usually spatiotemporally intertwined, we developed an integrated model combining their contributions, based on 5 years of observations following the 2016 Pedernales (Ecuador) earthquake. The results show that the early, near‐field postseismic deformation is dominated by afterslip, both updip and downdip of the coseismic rupture, and requires heterogeneous interface frictional properties. Viscoelastic relaxation contributes more to far‐field displacements at later time periods. The best‐fit integrated model favors a 45‐km thick lithosphere overlying a Burgers body viscoelastic asthenosphere with a Maxwell viscosity of 3 × 1019 Pa s (0.9–5 × 1019 Pa s at 95% confidence), assuming the Kelvin viscosity equal to 10% of that value. In addition to the postseismic afterslip, the coastal displacement of sites north and south of the rupture clearly require extra slip in the plate motion direction due to slow slip events that may be triggered by the coseismic stress changes (CSC) but are not purely driven by the CSC. Spatially variable afterslip following the Pedernales event, combined with the SSEs during the interseismic period, demonstrate that spatial frictional variability persists throughout the whole earthquake cycle. The interaction of adjacent fault patches with heterogeneous properties may contribute to the clustered large earthquakes in this area.
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10049930
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Geophysical Research Letters
- Volume:
- 44
- Issue:
- 24
- ISSN:
- 0094-8276
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 12,161-12,169
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract The eastern portion of the Shumagin gap along the Alaska Peninsula ruptured in an
M W 7.8 thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. The megathrust fault space‐time slip history is determined by joint inversion of regional and teleseismic waveform data along with co‐seismic static Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) displacements. The rupture expanded westward and along‐dip from the hypocenter, located adjacent to the 1938M W 8.2 Alaska earthquake, with slip and aftershocks extending into the gap about 180 to 205 km, respectively, at depths from 15 to 40 km. The deeper half of ~75% of the Shumagin gap experienced faulting. However, the patchy slip is significantly less than possible accumulated slip since the region's last major rupture in 1917, compatible with geodetic seismic‐coupling estimates of 10‐40% beneath the Shumagin Islands. The rupture terminated in the western region of very low seismic coupling. There was a regional decade‐scale decrease in b‐value prior to the 2020 event. -
more » « less
Abstract The Shumagin seismic gap along the Alaska Peninsula experienced a major,
M W 7.8, interplate thrust earthquake on 22 July 2020. Several available finite‐fault inversions indicate patchy slip of up to 4 m at 8–48 km depth. There are differences among the models in peak slip and absolute placement of slip on the plate boundary, resulting from differences in data distributions, model parameterizations, and inversion algorithms. Two representative slip models obtained from inversions of large seismic and geodetic data sets produce very different tsunami predictions at tide gauges and deep‐water pressure sensors (DART stations), despite having only secondary differences in slip distribution. This is found to be the result of the acute sensitivity of the tsunami excitation for rupture below the continental shelf in proximity to an abrupt shelf break. Iteratively perturbing seismic and geodetic inversions by constraining fault model extent along dip and strike, we obtain an optimal rupture model compatible with teleseismicP andSH waves, regional three‐component broadband and strong‐motion seismic recordings, hr‐GNSS time series and static offsets, as well as tsunami recordings at DART stations and regional and remote tide gauges. Slip is tightly bounded between 25 and 40 km depth, the up‐dip limit of slip in the earthquake is resolved to be well‐inland of the shelf break, and the rupture extent along strike is well‐constrained. The coseismic slip increased Coulomb stress on the shallow plate boundary extending to the trench, but the frictional behavior of the megathrust below the continental slope remains uncertain. -
The destructive 2023 moment magnitude ( M w ) 7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet ruptured multiple segments of the East Anatolian Fault system in Turkey. We integrate multi-scale seismic and space-geodetic observations with multi-fault kinematic inversions and dynamic rupture modeling to unravel the events’ complex rupture history and stress-mediated fault interactions. Our analysis reveals three sub-shear slip episodes during the initial M w 7.8 earthquake with delayed rupture initiation to the southwest. The M w 7.7 event occurred 9 hours later with larger slip and supershear rupture on its western branch. Mechanically consistent dynamic models accounting for fault interactions can explain the unexpected rupture paths, and require a heterogeneous background stress. Our results highlight the importance of combining near- and far-field observations with data-driven and physics-based models for seismic hazard assessment.more » « less
