How the Brain May Have Shaped Muscle Anatomy and Physiology: A Preliminary Study: Shaped Muscle Anatomy and Physiology
- PAR ID:
- 10051238
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Anatomical Record
- Volume:
- 301
- Issue:
- 3
- ISSN:
- 1932-8486
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 528 to 537
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
ABSTRACT Hapalemur sps . andProlemur simus (bamboo lemurs, collectively) stand out from the relatively homogeneous lemurids because they are bamboo feeders and vertical clingers and leapers. This unique diet presents equally unique challenges, like its verticality, toughness, and toxicity. The bamboo lemurs share the generalized anatomy of the other lemurids, but also display some well‐documented skeletal adaptations, perhaps to overcome the problems presented by their specialization. Soft‐tissue adaptations, however, remain largely unexplored. Explored here are possible soft‐tissue adaptations inHapalemur griseus . We compareH .griseus with other lemurids,Propithecus ,Galago ,Tarsier , and a tree shrew. Based on the available anatomical and physiological data, we hypothesize thatHapalemur andProlemur species will have differences in hindlimb morphology when compared with other lemurids. We predict thatH .griseus will have more hindlimb muscle mass and will amplify muscle mass differences with increased type II muscle fibers. Relative hindlimb muscle mass inH .griseus is less than other prosimians sampled, yet relative sural muscle mass is significantly heavier (P < 0.01) inH .griseus . Results show that the soleus muscle ofH .griseus has a higher amount of type II (fast) fibers in plantarflexors. These findings indicate althoughH .griseus shares some generalized lemurid morphology, its diet of bamboo may have pushed this generalized lemurid to an anatomical extreme. We suspect additional bamboo‐specific adaptations in their anatomy and physiology will be uncovered with further examination into the anatomy of the bamboo lemurs. Anat Rec, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Anat Rec, 303:295–307, 2020. © 2019 American Association for Anatomy -
ABSTRACT Skeletal muscle powers animal movement, making it an important determinant of fitness. The classic excitation–contraction coupling, sliding-filament and crossbridge theories are thought to describe the processes of muscle activation and the generation of force, work and power. Here, we review how the comparative, realistic muscle physiology typified by Journal of Experimental Biology over the last 100 years has supported and refuted these theories. We examine variation in the contraction rates and force–length and force–velocity relationships predicted by these theories across diverse muscles, and explore what has been learnt from the use of workloop and force-controlled techniques that attempt to replicate aspects of in vivo muscle function. We suggest inclusion of features of muscle contraction not explained by classic theories in our routine characterization of muscles, and the use of phylogenetic comparative methods to allow exploration of the effects of factors such as evolutionary history, ecology, behavior and size on muscle physiology and mechanics. We hope that these future directions will improve our understanding of the mechanisms of muscle contraction, allow us to better characterize the variation in muscle performance possible, and enable us to infer adaptation.more » « less
