More Like this

1. Phenology in a warming world: differences between native and non‐native plant species

   https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13290  

   Zettlemoyer, Meredith A. ; Schultheis, Elizabeth H. ; Lau, Jennifer A. ; Vila, Montserrat ( May 2019 , Ecology Letters)
2. Inoculation with native grassland soils improves native plant species germination in highly disturbed soil

   https://doi.org/10.1002/glr2.12018  

   Duell, Eric B. ; Hickman, Karen R. ; Wilson, Gail W. ; Zhang, Yingjun ( June 2022 , Grassland Research)
3. Rapid introgression of non‐native alleles following hybridization between a native Anolis lizard species and a cryptic invader across an urban landscape

   https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16897  

   DeVos, Tyler B. ; Bock, Dan G. ; Kolbe, Jason J. ( March 2023 , Molecular Ecology)
4. Limited evidence for phenological differences between non-native and native species

   https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.983172  

   Zettlemoyer, Meredith A. ; Ellis, Sage L. ; Hale, Clayton W. ; Horne, Emma C. ; Thoen, Riley D. ; DeMarche, Megan L. ( September 2022 , Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution)

   Although many species shift their phenology with climate change, species vary significantly in the direction and magnitude of these responses (i.e., phenological sensitivity). Studies increasingly detect early phenology or high phenological sensitivity to climate in non-native species, which may favor non-native species over natives in warming climates. Yet relatively few studies explicitly compare phenological responses to climate between native vs. non-native species or between non-native populations in the native vs. introduced range, limiting our ability to quantify the role of phenology in invasion success. Here, we review the empirical evidence for and against differences in phenology and phenological sensitivity to climate in both native vs. non-native species and native and introduced populations of non-native species. Contrary to common assumptions, native and non-native plant species did not consistently differ in mean phenology or phenological sensitivity. However, non-native plant species were often either just as or more sensitive, but rarely less sensitive, to climate as natives. Introduced populations of non-native plant species often show earlier reproduction than native populations of the same species, but there was mixed evidence for differences in phenological sensitivity between introduced and native plant populations. We found very few studies comparing native vs. invasive animal phenology. Future workmore »should characterize phenological sensitivity to climate in native vs. non-native plant and animal species, in native vs. introduced populations of non-native species, and across different stages of invasion, and should carefully consider how differences in phenology might promote invasion success or disadvantage native species under climate change.« less
5. Adaptive capacity in the foundation tree species Populus fremontii: implications for resilience to climate change and non-native species invasion in the American Southwest

   https://doi.org/10.1093/conphys/coaa061  

   Hultine, Kevin R ; Allan, Gerard J ; Blasini, Davis ; Bothwell, Helen M ; Cadmus, Abraham ; Cooper, Hillary F ; Doughty, Chris E ; Gehring, Catherine A ; Gitlin, Alicyn R ; Grady, Kevin C ; et al ( January 2020 , Conservation Physiology)

   Cooke, Steven (Ed.)

   Abstract Populus fremontii (Fremont cottonwood) is recognized as one of the most important foundation tree species in the southwestern USA and northern Mexico because of its ability to structure communities across multiple trophic levels, drive ecosystem processes and influence biodiversity via genetic-based functional trait variation. However, the areal extent of P. fremontii cover has declined dramatically over the last century due to the effects of surface water diversions, non-native species invasions and more recently climate change. Consequently, P. fremontii gallery forests are considered amongst the most threatened forest types in North America. In this paper, we unify four conceptual areas of genes to ecosystems research related to P. fremontii’s capacity to survive or even thrive under current and future environmental conditions: (i) hydraulic function related to canopy thermal regulation during heat waves; (ii) mycorrhizal mutualists in relation to resiliency to climate change and invasion by the non-native tree/shrub, Tamarix; (iii) phenotypic plasticity as a mechanism for coping with rapid changes in climate; and (iv) hybridization between P. fremontii and other closely related Populus species where enhanced vigour of hybrids may preserve the foundational capacity of Populus in the face of environmental change. We also discuss opportunities to scale these conceptualmore »areas from genes to the ecosystem level via remote sensing. We anticipate that the exploration of these conceptual areas of research will facilitate solutions to climate change with a foundation species that is recognized as being critically important for biodiversity conservation and could serve as a model for adaptive management of arid regions in the southwestern USA and around the world.« less