Abstract This article articulates conceptual and methodological strategies for studying the dynamic structure of dyadic interaction revealed by the turn-to-turn exchange of messages between partners. Using dyadic time series data that capture partners’ back-and-forth contributions to conversations, dynamic dyadic systems analysis illuminates how individuals act and react to each other as they jointly construct conversations. Five layers of inquiry are offered, each of which yields theoretically relevant information: (a) identifying the individual moves and dyadic spaces that set the stage for dyadic interaction; (b) summarizing conversational units and sequences; (c) examining between-dyad differences in overall conversational structure; (d) describing the temporal evolution of conversational units and sequences; and (e) mapping within-dyad dynamics of conversations and between-dyad differences in those dynamics. Each layer of analysis is illustrated using examples from research on supportive conversations, and the application of dynamic dyadic systems analysis to a range of interpersonal communication phenomena is discussed.
more »
« less
Conversing with a devil’s advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement
This study investigates the presence of dynamical patterns of interpersonal coordination in extended deceptive conversations across multimodal channels of behavior. Using a novel "devil’s advocate" paradigm, we experimentally elicited deception and truth across topics in which conversational partners either agreed or disagreed, and where one partner was surreptitiously asked to argue an opinion opposite of what he or she really believed. We focus on interpersonal coordination as an emergent behavioral signal that captures interdependencies between conversational partners, both as the coupling of head movements over the span of milliseconds, measured via a windowed lagged cross correlation (WLCC) technique, and more global temporal dependencies across speech rate, using cross recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA). Moreover, we considered how interpersonal coordination might be shaped by strategic, adaptive conversational goals associated with deception. We found that deceptive conversations displayed more structured speech rate and higher head movement coordination, the latter with a peak in deceptive disagreement conversations. Together the results allow us to posit an adaptive account, whereby interpersonal coordination is not beholden to any single functional explanation, but can strategically adapt to diverse conversational demands.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1660894
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10054140
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- PloS one
- Volume:
- 12
- Issue:
- 6
- ISSN:
- 1932-6203
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-25
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
This paper presents a computational study to analyze and predict turns (i.e., turn-taking and turn-keeping) in multiparty conversations. Specifically, we use a high-fidelity hybrid data acquisition system to capture a large-scale set of multi-modal natural conversational behaviors of interlocutors in three-party conversations, including gazes, head movements, body movements, speech, etc. Based on the inter-pausal units (IPUs) extracted from the in-house acquired dataset, we propose a transformer-based computational model to predict the turns based on the interlocutor states (speaking/back-channeling/silence) and the gaze targets. Our model can robustly achieve more than 80% accuracy, and the generalizability of our model was extensively validated through cross-group experiments. Also, we introduce a novel computational metric called “relative engagement level" (REL) of IPUs, and further validate its statistical significance between turn-keeping IPUs and turn-taking IPUs, and between different conversational groups. Our experimental results also found that the patterns of the interlocutor states can be used as a more effective cue than their gaze behaviors for predicting turns in multiparty conversations.more » « less
-
Advancing speech emotion recognition (SER) de- pends highly on the source used to train the model, i.e., the emotional speech corpora. By permuting different design parameters, researchers have released versions of corpora that attempt to provide a better-quality source for training SER. In this work, we focus on studying communication modes of collection. In particular, we analyze the patterns of emotional speech collected during interpersonal conversations or monologues. While it is well known that conversation provides a better protocol for eliciting authentic emotion expressions, there is a lack of systematic analyses to determine whether conversational speech provide a “better-quality” source. Specifically, we examine this research question from three perspectives: perceptual differences, acoustic variability and SER model learning. Our analyses on the MSP- Podcast corpus show that: 1) rater’s consistency for conversation recordings is higher when evaluating categorical emotions, 2) the perceptions and acoustic patterns observed on conversations have properties that are better aligned with expected trends discussed in emotion literature, and 3) a more robust SER model can be trained from conversational data. This work brings initial evidences stating that samples of conversations may provide a better-quality source than samples from monologues for building a SER model.more » « less
-
With few exceptions, most research in automated assessment of depression has considered only the patient’s behavior to the exclusion of the therapist’s behavior. We investigated the interpersonal coordination (synchrony) of head movement during patient-therapist clinical interviews. Participants with major depressive disorder were recorded in clinical interviews (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, HRSD) at 7-week intervals over a period of 21 weeks. For each session, patient and therapist 3D head movement was tracked from 2D videos. Head angles in the horizontal (pitch) and vertical (yaw) axes were used to measure head movement. Interpersonal coordination of head movement between patients and therapists was measured using windowed cross-correlation. Patterns of coordination in head movement were investigated using the peak picking algorithm. Changes in head movement coordination over the course of treatment were measured using a hierarchical linear model (HLM). The results indicated a strong effect for patient-therapist head movement synchrony. Within-dyad variability in head movement coordination was higher than between-dyad variability, meaning that differences over time in a dyad were higher as compared to the differences between dyads. Head movement synchrony did not change over the course of treatment. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first attempt to analyze the mutual influence of patient-therapist head movement in relation to depression severity.more » « less
-
Predators and prey exist in persistent conflict that often hinges on deception—the transmission of misleading or manipulative signals—as a means for survival. Deceptive traits are widespread across taxa and sensory systems, representing an evolutionarily successful and common strategy. Moreover, the highly conserved nature of the major sensory systems often extends these traits past single species predator–prey interactions toward a broader set of perceivers. As such, deceptive traits can provide a unique window into the capabilities, constraints and commonalities across divergent and phylogenetically-related perceivers. Researchers have studied deceptive traits for centuries, but a unified framework for categorizing different types of post-detection deception in predator–prey conflict still holds potential to inform future research. We suggest that deceptive traits can be distinguished by their effect on object formation processes. Perceptual objects are composed of physical attributes (what) and spatial (where) information. Deceptive traits that operate after object formation can therefore influence the perception and processing of either or both of these axes. We build upon previous work using a perceiver perspective approach to delineate deceptive traits by whether they closely match the sensory information of another object or create a discrepancy between perception and reality by exploiting the sensory shortcuts and perceptual biases of their perceiver. We then further divide this second category, sensory illusions, into traits that distort object characteristics along either the what or where axes, and those that create the perception of whole novel objects, integrating the what/where axes. Using predator–prey examples, we detail each step in this framework and propose future avenues for research. We suggest that this framework will help organize the many forms of deceptive traits and help generate predictions about selective forces that have driven animal form and behavior across evolutionary time.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178140
