skip to main content


Title: Gesture for generalization: gesture facilitates flexible learning of words for actions on objects
Abstract

Verb learning is difficult for children (Gentner,), partially because children have a bias to associate a novel verb not only with the action it represents, but also with the object on which it is learned (Kersten & Smith,). Here we investigate how well 4‐ and 5‐year‐old children (N= 48) generalize novel verbs for actions on objects after doing or seeing the action (e.g., twisting a knob on an object) or after doing or seeing a gesture for the action (e.g., twisting in the air near an object). We find not only that children generalize more effectively through gesture experience, but also that this ability to generalize persists after a 24‐hour delay.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10056712
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Developmental Science
Volume:
21
Issue:
5
ISSN:
1363-755X
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    Teaching a new concept through gestures—hand movements that accompany speech—facilitates learning above‐and‐beyond instruction through speech alone (e.g., Singer & Goldin‐Meadow,). However, the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon are still under investigation. Here, we use eye tracking to explore one often proposed mechanism—gesture's ability to direct visual attention. Behaviorally, we replicate previous findings: Children perform significantly better on a posttest after learning through Speech+Gesture instruction than through Speech Alone instruction. Using eye tracking measures, we show that children who watch a math lesson with gesturedoallocate their visual attention differently from children who watch a math lesson without gesture—they look more to the problem being explained, less to the instructor, and are more likely to synchronize their visual attention with information presented in the instructor's speech (i.e.,follow along with speech) than children who watch the no‐gesture lesson. The striking finding is that, even though these looking patterns positively predict learning outcomes, the patterns do notmediatethe effects of training condition (Speech Alone vs. Speech+Gesture) on posttest success. We find instead a complex relation between gesture and visual attention in which gesturemoderatesthe impact of visual looking patterns on learning—following along with speechpredicts learning for children in the Speech+Gesture condition, but not for children in the Speech Alone condition. Gesture's beneficial effects on learning thus come not merely from its ability to guide visual attention, but also from its ability to synchronize with speech and affect what learners glean from that speech.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Analogy researchers do not often examine gesture, and gesture researchers do not often borrow ideas from the study of analogy. One borrowable idea from the world of analogy is the importance of distinguishing between attributes and relations. Gentner (,) observed that some metaphors highlight attributes and others highlight relations, and called the latteranalogies. Mirroring this logic, we observe that some metaphoric gestures represent attributes and others represent relations, and propose to call the latteranalogical gestures. We provide examples of such analogical gestures and show how they relate to the categories of iconic and metaphoric gestures described previously. Analogical gestures represent different types of relations and different degrees of relational complexity, and sometimes cohere into larger analogical models. Treating analogical gestures as a distinct phenomenon prompts new questions and predictions, and illustrates one way that the study of gesture and the study of analogy can be mutually informative.

     
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    How do children acquire exact meanings for number words likethreeorforty‐seven? In recent years, a lively debate has probed the cognitive systems that support learning, with some arguing that an evolutionarily ancient “approximate number system” drives early number word meanings, and others arguing that learning is supported chiefly by representations of small sets of discrete individuals. This debate has centered around the findings generated by Wynn's (,) Give‐a‐Number task, which she used to categorize children into discrete “knower level” stages. Early reports confirmed Wynn's analysis, and took these stages to support the “small sets” hypothesis. However, more recent studies have disputed this analysis, and have argued that Give‐a‐Number data reveal a strong role for approximate number representations. In the present study, we use previously collected Give‐a‐Number data to replicate the analyses of these past studies, and to show that differences between past studies are due to assumptions made in analyses, rather than to differences in data themselves. We also show how Give‐a‐Number data violate the assumptions of parametric tests used in past studies. Based on simple non‐parametric tests and model simulations, we conclude that (a) before children learn exact meanings for words likeone, two, three,andfour,they first acquire noisy preliminary meanings for these words, (b) there is no reliable evidence of preliminary meanings for larger meanings, and (c) Give‐a‐Number cannot be used to readily identify signatures of the approximate number system.

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    The systematics of the enigmatic and rather uncommon species ofSeaHayward andCybdelisBoisduval is assessed through morphological and molecular analyses. The aim of this paper is three‐fold: (i) to ascertain the phylogenetic position ofSeaandCybdelisin Biblidinae; (ii) to determine the evolutionary relationships among species ofSeaandCybdelis; and (iii) to review the taxonomy ofSeaandCybdelis. The result of the molecular analysis recoversSeasister toCybdelis, and this clade sister to Eubagina (sensu Lamas,), rendering Epicaliina (sensu Lamas,) paraphyletic. A new tribe, Cybdelinitrib.n.is erected to includeSeaandCybdelis; the other genera formerly included in Epicaliina (sensu Lamas,),EunicaHübner andSeveniaKoçak are assigned to Eunicinitrib.rest., and the remaining genera of Biblidinae to other previously recognized tribes, similar to those implicitly proposed by Wahlberget al. (). The morphological analysis recovers similar results and the following relationships among species ofCybdelis:C. phaesyla(Hübner) (C. bolivianaSalvin (C. mnasylusDoubleday (C. petronitaBurmeisterstat.rest.+C. thrasyllaC. Felder & R. Felderstat.rest.))).SeaandCybdelisare recognized as distinct genera; a new subspecies,S. sophronia jenkinsiDias, Siewert & Freitasssp.n., distributed from Venezuela to Bolivia along the Andes eastern foothills, is described; andC. petronitaandC. thrasyllaare accepted as valid species. Lectotypes forC. boliviana,C. peruvianaStaudinger,C. mnasylus, C. thrasylla,C. petronitaandC. mnasylusvar.meridionalisHall and a neotype forVanessa sophroniaGodart are designated. Additionally, dichotomous keys and distribution maps to all taxa are provided; male genitalia and hypandria are illustrated for all species; generic characters of the head, labial palpi and legs are illustrated; immature stages of some species also are figured.

    The published work has been registered on ZooBank:http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D8EBB649‐5E9D‐4218‐B1F1‐7A69DA775FD0.

     
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Developing scientific literacy about water systems is critical for K‐12 students. However, even with opportunities to build knowledge about the hydrosphere in elementary classrooms, early learners may struggle to understand the water cycle (Forbes et al.,; Gunckel et al.,; Zangori et al.,; Zangori et al.,). Scientific modeling affords opportunities for students to develop representations, make their ideas visible, and generate model‐based explanations for complex natural systems like the water cycle. This study describes a comprehensive evaluation of a 5‐year, design‐based research project focused on the development, implementation, revision, and testing of an enhanced, model‐centered version of the Full Option Science System (FOSS)Water(2005) unit in third grade classrooms. Here, we build upon our previous work (Forbes et al.,a; b; Vo et al.,; Zangori et al.,; Zangori et al.,) by conducting a comparative analysis of student outcomes in two sets of classrooms: (1) one implementing the modeling‐enhanced version of the FOSS Water unit developed by the research team (n = 6), and 2) another using the standard, unmodified version of the same curricular unit (n = 5). Results demonstrate that teachers in both conditions implemented the two versions of the curriculum with relative fidelity. On average, students exposed to the modeling‐enhanced version of the curriculum showed greater gains in their model‐based explanations for the hydrosphere. Engagement in scientific modeling allowed students to articulate hydrologic phenomena by (1) identifying various elements that constitute the hydrosphere, (2) describing how these elements influenced the movement of water in the hydrosphere, and (3) demonstrating underlying processes that govern the movement of water in the hydrosphere.

     
    more » « less