With the aim of constructing hydrogen‐bonding networks in synthetic complexes, two new ligands derived from
Oxoiron(IV) units are often implicated as intermediates in the catalytic cycles of non‐heme iron oxygenases and oxidases. The most reactive synthetic analogues of these intermediates are supported by tetradentate tripodal ligands with
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10062024
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Angewandte Chemie International Edition
- Volume:
- 57
- Issue:
- 30
- ISSN:
- 1433-7851
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 9387-9391
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Abstract cis,cis ‐1,3,5‐triaminocyclohexane (TACH) have been prepared that feature pendant pyrrole or indole rings as outer‐sphere H‐bond donors. The TACH framework offers a facial arrangement of threeN ‐donors, thereby mimicking common coordination motifs in the active sites of nonheme Fe and Cu enzymes. X‐ray structural characterization of a series of CuI‐X complexes (X=F, Cl, Br, NCS) revealed that these neutral ligands (H3LR, R=pyrrole or indole) coordinate in the intended facialN 3manner, yielding four‐coordinate complexes with idealizedC 3symmetry. The N−H units of the outer‐sphere heterocycles form a hydrogen‐bonding cavity around the axial (pseudo)halide ligand, as verified by crystallographic, spectroscopic, and computational analyses. Treatment of H3Lpyrroleand H3Lindolewith divalent transition metal chlorides (MIICl2, M=Fe, Cu, Zn) causes one heterocycle to deprotonate and coordinate to the M(II) center, giving rise to tetradentate ligands with two remaining outer‐sphere H‐bond donors. Further ligand deprotonation is observed upon reaction with Ni(II) and Cu(II) salts with weakly coordinating counteranions. The reported complexes highlight the versatility of TACH‐based ligands with pendant H‐bond donors, as the resulting scaffolds can support multiple protonation states, coordination geometries, and H‐bonding interactions. -
Abstract Reactivities of non‐heme iron(IV)‐oxo complexes are mostly controlled by the ligands. Complexes with tetradentate ligands such as [(TPA)FeO]2+(TPA=tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine) belong to the most reactive ones. Here, we show a fine‐tuning of the reactivity of [(TPA)FeO]2+by an additional ligand X (X=CH3CN, CF3SO3−, ArI, and ArIO; ArI=2‐(
t BuSO2)C6H4I) attached in solution and reveal a thus far unknown role of the ArIO oxidant. The HAT reactivity of [(TPA)FeO(X)]+/2+decreases in the order of X: ArIO > MeCN > ArI ≈ TfO−. Hence, ArIO is not just a mere oxidant of the iron(II) complex, but it can also increase the reactivity of the iron(IV)‐oxo complex as a labile ligand. The detected HAT reactivities of the [(TPA)FeO(X)]+/2+complexes correlate with the Fe=O and FeO−H stretching vibrations of the reactants and the respective products as determined by infrared photodissociation spectroscopy. Hence, the most reactive [(TPA)FeO(ArIO)]2+adduct in the series has the weakest Fe=O bond and forms the strongest FeO−H bond in the HAT reaction. -
Abstract Reactivities of non‐heme iron(IV)‐oxo complexes are mostly controlled by the ligands. Complexes with tetradentate ligands such as [(TPA)FeO]2+(TPA=tris(2‐pyridylmethyl)amine) belong to the most reactive ones. Here, we show a fine‐tuning of the reactivity of [(TPA)FeO]2+by an additional ligand X (X=CH3CN, CF3SO3−, ArI, and ArIO; ArI=2‐(
t BuSO2)C6H4I) attached in solution and reveal a thus far unknown role of the ArIO oxidant. The HAT reactivity of [(TPA)FeO(X)]+/2+decreases in the order of X: ArIO > MeCN > ArI ≈ TfO−. Hence, ArIO is not just a mere oxidant of the iron(II) complex, but it can also increase the reactivity of the iron(IV)‐oxo complex as a labile ligand. The detected HAT reactivities of the [(TPA)FeO(X)]+/2+complexes correlate with the Fe=O and FeO−H stretching vibrations of the reactants and the respective products as determined by infrared photodissociation spectroscopy. Hence, the most reactive [(TPA)FeO(ArIO)]2+adduct in the series has the weakest Fe=O bond and forms the strongest FeO−H bond in the HAT reaction. -
Abstract Binuclear alkyne manganese carbonyls of the type (RC≡CR')Mn2(CO)
n (R and R'=methyl or dimethylamino;n =8, 7, 6) and their isomers related to the experimentally known (MeC2NEt2)Mn2(CO)n (n =8, 7) structures have been investigated by density functional theory. The alkyne ligand remains intact in the only low energy (Me2N)2C2Mn2(CO)8isomer, which has a central Mn2C2tetrahedrane unit and is otherwise analogous to the well‐known (alkyne)Co2(CO)6derivatives except for one more CO group per metal atom. The low‐energy structures of the unsaturated (Me2N)2C2Mn2(CO)n (n =7, 6) systems include isomers in which the nitrogen atom of one of the dimethylamino groups as well as the C≡C triple bond of the alkyne is coordinated to the central Mn2unit. In other low‐energy (Me2N)2C2Mn2(CO)n (n =7, 6) isomers the alkyne C≡C triple bond has broken completely to form two separate bridging dimethylaminocarbyne Me2NC ligands analogous to the experimentally known iron carbonyl complex (Et2NC)2Fe2(CO)6. The (alkyne)Mn2(CO)n (n =8, 7, 6) systems of the alkynes MeC≡CMe and Me2NC≡CMe with methyl substituents have significantly more complicated potential surfaces. In these systems the lowest energy isomers have bridging ligands derived from the alkyne in which one or two hydrogen atoms have migrated from a methyl group to one or both of the alkyne carbon atoms. These bridging ligands include allene, manganallyl, and vinylcarbene ligands, the first two of which have been realized experimentally in research by Adams and coworkers. Theoretical studies suggest that the mechanism for the conversion of the simple alkyne octacarbonyl (MeC2NMe2)Mn2(CO)8to the dimethylaminomanganaallyl complex Mn2(CO)7[μ‐η4‐C3H3Me2] involves decarbonylation to the heptacarbonyl and the hexacarbonyl complexes. Subsequent hydrogen migrations then occur through intermediates with C−H−Mn agostic interactions to give the final product. Eight transition states for this mechanistic sequence have been identified with activation energies of ∼20 kcal/mol for the first hydrogen migration and ∼14 kcal/mol for the second hydrogen migration. -
Abstract Catalysis of
O ‐atom transfer (OAT) reactions is a characteristic of both natural (enzymatic) and synthetic molybdenum‐oxo and ‐peroxo complexes. These reactions can employ a variety of terminal oxidants, e. g. DMSO,N ‐oxides, and peroxides, etc., but rarely molecular oxygen. Here we demonstrate the ability of a set of Schiff‐base‐MoO2complexes (cy‐salen)MoO2(cy‐salen=N,N’ ‐cyclohexyl‐1,2‐bis‐salicylimine) to catalyze the aerobic oxidation of PPh3. We also report the results of a DFT computational investigation of the catalytic pathway, including the identification of energetically accessible intermediates and transition states, for the aerobic oxidation of PMe3. Starting from the dioxo species, (cy‐salen)Mo(VI)O2(1 ), key reaction steps include: 1) associative addition of PMe3to an oxo‐O to give LMo(IV)(O)(OPMe3) (2 ); 2) OPMe3dissociation from2 to produce mono‐oxo complex (cy‐salen)Mo(IV)O (3 ); 3) stepwise O2association with3 via superoxo species (cy‐salen)Mo(V)(O)(η1‐O2) (4 ) to form the oxo‐peroxo intermediate (cy‐salen)Mo(VI)(O)(η2‐O2) (5 ); 4) theO ‐transfer reaction of PMe3with oxo‐peroxo species5 at the oxo‐group, rather than the peroxo unit leading, after OPMe3dissociation, to a monoperoxo species, (cy‐salen)Mo(IV)(η2‐O2) (7 ); and 5) regeneration of the dioxo complex (cy‐salen)Mo(VI)O2(1 ) from the monoperoxo triplet3 7 or singlet1 7 by a concerted, asynchronous electronic isomerization. An alternative pathway for recycling of the oxo‐peroxo species5 to the dioxo‐Mo1 via a bimetallic peroxo complex LMo(O)‐O−O‐Mo(O)L8 is determined to be energetically viable, but is unlikely to be competitive with the primary pathway for aerobic phosphine oxidation catalyzed by1 .