skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 11:00 PM ET on Thursday, June 11 until 2:00 AM ET on Friday, June 12 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Interactions between urban heat islands and heat waves
Award ID(s):
1664021
PAR ID:
10066401
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Environmental Research Letters
Volume:
13
Issue:
3
ISSN:
1748-9326
Page Range / eLocation ID:
034003
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract We evaluate hydrothermal heat loss from 11 volcanic‐arc segments (∼6,000 km of arc length, ∼10% of the global total), motivated by the observation that much magmatic heat ultimately crosses the land surface as heated aqueous fluid. Heat loss takes place by volcanic eruption, geothermal heat conduction to the surface, fumarolic (vapor) discharge, thermal springs, and discharge of groundwater that has been heated by only a few degrees. Heat loss by extrusion of volcanic products ranges from 0.1 to ∼4 MW/km. For some arc segments, the hydrothermal heat loss is dominated by “slightly thermal” springs (maximum ∼10 MW/km arc length) or thermal springs (maximum ∼21 MW/km), but more commonly by hydrothermal steam vents and volcanic fumaroles (maximum ∼7 MW/km). Total hydrothermal heat‐loss rates range from <2.5 MW/km (Southwest Japan, Cascade Range, Northeast Japan, Kurils) to ≥8 MW/km (Ryukyu, Apennines, Taupo Volcanic Zone). We use these hydrothermal heat losses to estimate rates of magma supply, and combine these estimates of magma supply with existing estimates of eruption rates to obtain intrusion:extrusion ratios. Potential causal influences include state‐of‐stress and the abundance of silicic magma in the midcrust. Likely causes of along‐arc variations range from the near‐surface (0–5 km) hydraulic architecture (Cascade Range) to the nature of the subducting plate (Ryukyu vs. the rest of southwest Japan). Inferred intrusion: extrusion ratios are generally between 0.5 and 9. Whole‐arc comparisons between heat‐flow‐based intrusion rates and those based on volatile fluxes and petrologic models are complicated by the wide range of along‐arc behavior and the fact that we sometimes rely on volatile fluxes (e.g., SO2) to help calculate hydrothermal heat losses, so that the data sets are not fully independent. However, reasonable agreement can be demonstrated in some examples of arc subsections. 
    more » « less
  2. Flow past disperse solid particles or bubbles induces fluctuations in carrier fluid velocity, which correlate with temperature fluctuations in non-isothermal flows resulting in the pseudo-turbulent heat flux (PTHF). In the Eulerian-Eulerian (EE) two-fluid (TF) model, the transport of PTHF is shown to be an important contributor to the overall energy budget, and is modeled using a pseudo-turbulent thermal diffusivity (PTTD). The PTHF and PTTD were originally quantified using particle-resolved direct numerical simulation (PR-DNS) data, and correlations were developed over a range of solid volume fraction (0.1 ≤ 𝜀𝑠 ≤ 0.5) and mean slip Reynolds number (1 ≤ 𝑅𝑒𝑚 ≤ 100) for a Prandtl number of 0.7. However, the original PTTD correlation diverges to infinity as the solid volume fraction goes to zero, which is physically unrealistic. This singular behavior is problematic for EE TF simulations at particle material fronts where solid volume fraction values can fall below the lower limit of existing data (𝜀𝑠 =0.1) to zero in the pure carrier phase. In this work, additional PR-DNS data are reported for 𝜀𝑠 < 0.1, and improved correlations are developed for the PTHF and PTTD. The new PTTD correlation is non- singular, and both the PTHF and PTTD decay exponentially to zero as the solid volume fraction approaches zero, which is physically reasonable. This improves prediction of PTHF transport in dilute flow using EE TF heat transfer simulations. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract In fire hazard calculations, knowledge of the heat-release rate (HRR) of a burning item is imperative. Typically, room-scale calorimetry is conducted to determine the HRRs of common combustible items. However, this process can be prohibitively expensive. In this work, a method is proposed to invert for the HRR of a single item burning in a room using transient heat flux measurements at the walls and ceiling near the item. The primary device used to measure heat flux is the directional flame thermometer (DFT). The utility of the inverse method is explored on both synthetically generated and experimental data using two so-called forward models in the inversion algorithm: fire dynamics simulator (FDS) and the consolidated model of fire and smoke transport (CFAST). The fires in this work have peak HRRs ranging from 200 kW to 400 kW. It was found that FDS outperformed CFAST as a forward model at the expense of increased computational cost and that the error in the inverse reconstruction of a 400 kW steady fire was on par with room-scale oxygen consumption calorimetry. 
    more » « less
  4. While air heat waves often grab headlines, riverine heat waves have gone quietly unnoticed because rivers are commonly perceived as cool refuges. Analysis of riverine heat waves has been hindered by fragmented datasets, despite a proliferation in water-temperature monitoring with sensors and satellites. Here, we analyze riverine heat wave events by training one single deep learning (long short-term memory) model and reconstructing consistent and continuous daily water temperatures (WT) in 1471 sites in the Contiguous United States (1980–2022). We show that riverine heat waves occur at about half the frequency (2.3 versus 4.6 events/year), a third intensity (2.6 versus 7.7 °C/event), but almost double the duration (7.2 versus 4.0 d/event) of air heat waves. Riverine heat wave events have increased at double to quadruple rates of air heat wave events, amounting to an additional 1.8 events/year in frequency, 0.43 °C/event in intensity, 3.4 d/event in duration, and 7 to 15 additional thermal stress days for aquatic ecosystems in 2022 compared to 1980. Rising riverine heat waves have outpaced those of air heat waves in 65 to 76% of the sites, particularly in regions experiencing accelerated warming (e.g., the Rockies). Riverine heat wave trends are driven predominantly by climate-induced changes such as warming and dwindling snowpacks and water flow. Human activities do play important roles: large dams elongate, whereas agriculture reduces heat waves. These results highlight anthropogenic climate change as the primary external driver, whereas human-induced structural changes as the secondary internal modulators of river response to heat disturbance. The widespread rise of riverine heat waves threatens aquatic ecosystems and water-energy-food security, underscoring the need for their global characterization and risk assessment. 
    more » « less