skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: OAPS: An Optimization Algorithm for Part Separation in Assembly Design for Additive Manufacturing
Additive Manufacturing (AM) provides the advantage of producing complex shapes that are not possible through traditional cutting processes. Along with this line, assembly-based part design in AM creates some opportunities for productivity improvement. This paper proposes an improved optimization algorithm for part separation (OAPS) in assembly-based part design in additive manufacturing. For a given object, previous studies often provide the optimal number of parts resulting from cutting processes and their corresponding orientation to obtain the minimum processing time. During part separation, the cutting plane direction to generate subparts for assembly was often selected randomly in previous studies. The current work addresses the use of random cutting planes for part separation and instead uses the hill climbing optimization technique to generate the cutting planes to separate the parts. The OAPS provides the optimal number of assemblies and the build orientation of the parts for the minimum processing time. Two examples are provided to demonstrate the application of OAPS algorithm.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1727190
PAR ID:
10071644
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the ASME 2018 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering Conference IDETC/CIE 2018 August 26-29, 2018, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Additive manufacturing (AM) has the potential to improve productivity especially processing time, cost and surface roughness. In similar lines, part separation for assembly-based design in additive manufacturing can help in improving productivity. This paper discusses an optimization technique for part separation in assembly based part design in additive manufacturing. The technique improves productivity by decreasing the processing time of printed parts, which is the sum of the build time and the assembly time. The technique uses optimal cutting planes for part separation that has distinct advantages compared to random cutting planes. The work discusses a Genetic Algorithm (GA) technique for part separation using planar cuts. The optimization technique provides the optimal number of parts for assembly and their corresponding build orientations for the minimum processing time. Three examples have been provided to demonstrate the application of the proposed method. Finally, the results from two examples are compared to the already established hill climbing optimization method for part separation. 
    more » « less
  2. Additive manufacturing (AM) has impacted the manufacturing of complex three-dimensional objects in multiple materials for a wide array of applications. However, additive manufacturing, as an upcoming field, lacks automated and specific design rules for different AM processes. Moreover, the selection of specific AM processes for different geometries requires expert knowledge, which is difficult to replicate. An automated and data-driven system is needed that can capture the AM expert knowledge base and apply it to 3D-printed parts to avoid manufacturability issues. This research aims to develop a data-driven system for AM process selection within the design for additive manufacturing (DFAM) framework for Industry 4.0. A Genetic and Evolutionary Feature Weighting technique was optimized using 3D CAD data as an input to identify the optimal AM technique based on several requirements and constraints. A two-stage model was developed wherein the stage 1 model displayed average accuracies of 70% and the stage 2 model showed higher average accuracies of up to 97.33% based on quantitative feature labeling and augmentation of the datasets. The steady-state genetic algorithm (SSGA) was determined to be the most effective algorithm after benchmarking against estimation of distribution algorithm (EDA) and particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithms, respectively. The output of this system leads to the identification of optimal AM processes for manufacturing 3D objects. This paper presents an automated design for an additive manufacturing system that is accurate and can be extended to other 3D-printing processes. 
    more » « less
  3. To produce a large object within a limited workspace of an Additive Manufacturing (AM) machine, this study proposes a two-phase method: (1) part decomposition to separate a part into several pieces; and (2) 2D batch placement to place the decomposed parts onto multiple batches. In Phase 1, the large object is re-designed into small pieces by a Binary Space Partitioning (BSP) with a hyperplane, where parts are decomposed recursively until no parts are oversize the limited size of the workspace. In Phase 2, the decomposed parts are grouped as batches to go through serial build processes using a single AM machine. Within a batch, the decomposed parts are placed based on a 2D packing method in which parts are not placed over other parts to avoid potential surface damage caused by support structure between parts. A genetic algorithm (GA) for the 2D batch placement is applied to find near-optimal solutions for build orientations, placement positions, and batch number for each part. As an objective function, the total process time including build time and post-processing time is minimized. This research provides some insights into the relation between part decomposition and 2D batch placement. It shows that minimizing the number of decomposed parts could be more critical than minimizing the size of decomposed parts for reducing the overall process time in serial batch processes. 
    more » « less
  4. Additive manufacturing (AM) is a disruptive technology with a unique capability in fabricating parts with complex geometry and fixing broken supply chains. However, many AM techniques are complicated with their processing features due to complex heating and cooling cycles with the melting of feedstock materials. Therefore, it is quite challenging to directly apply the materials design and processing optimization method used for conventional manufacturing to AM techniques. In this viewpoint paper, we discuss some of the ongoing efforts of high-throughput (HT) experimentation, which can be used for materials development and processing design. Particularly, we focus on the beam- and powder-based AM techniques since these methods have demonstrated success in HT experimentation. In addition, we propose new opportunities to apply AM techniques as the materials informatic tools contributing to materials genome. 
    more » « less
  5. Direct digital manufacturing (DDM) is the creation of a physical part directly from a computer-aided design (CAD) model with minimal process planning and is typically applied to additive manufacturing (AM) processes to fabricate complex geometry. AM is preferred for DDM because of its minimal user input requirements; as a result, users can focus on exploiting other advantages of AM, such as the creation of intricate mechanisms that require no assembly after fabrication. Such assembly free mechanisms can be created using DDM during a single build process. In contrast, subtractive manufacturing (SM) enables the creation of higher strength parts that do not suffer from the material anisotropy inherent in AM. However, process planning for SM is more difficult than it is for AM due to geometric constraints imposed by the machining process; thus, the application of SM to the fabrication of assembly free mechanisms is challenging. This research describes a voxel-based computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) system that enables direct digital subtractive manufacturing (DDSM) of an assembly free mechanism. Process planning for SM involves voxel-by-voxel removal of material in the same way that an AM process consists of layer-by-layer addition of material. The voxelized CAM system minimizes user input by automatically generating toolpaths based on an analysis of accessible material to remove for a certain clearance in the mechanism's assembled state. The DDSM process is validated and compared to AM using case studies of the manufacture of two assembly free ball-in-socket mechanisms. 
    more » « less