More Like this

1. Response to Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C ₃ versus C ₄ grass response to elevated CO ₂ during a 20-year field experiment”

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau8982  

   Reich, Peter B.; Hobbie, Sarah E.; Lee, Tali D.; Pastore, Melissa A. (September 2018, Science)

   Nie and colleagues suggest a key role for interannual climate variation as an explanation for the temporal dynamics of an unexpected 20-year reversal of biomass responses of C 3 -C 4 grasses to elevated CO 2 . However, we had already identified some climate-dependent differences in C 3 and C 4 responses to eCO 2 and shown that these could not fully explain the temporal dynamics we observed. 

   more » « less
2. Unexpected reversal of C ₃ versus C ₄ grass response to elevated CO ₂ during a 20-year field experiment

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9313  

   Reich, Peter B.; Hobbie, Sarah E.; Lee, Tali D.; Pastore, Melissa A. (April 2018, Science)
3. The rapid A/C _i response: a guide to best practices

   https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15383  

   Stinziano, Joseph R.; McDermitt, Dayle K.; Lynch, Douglas J.; Saathoff, Aaron J.; Morgan, Patrick B.; Hanson, David T. (September 2018, New Phytologist)
4. The rapid A-C _i response: photosynthesis in the phenomic era: Rapid A-C _i response (RACiR)

   https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12911  

   Stinziano, Joseph R.; Morgan, Patrick B.; Lynch, Douglas J.; Saathoff, Aaron J.; McDermitt, Dayle K.; Hanson, David T. (August 2017, Plant, Cell & Environment)
5. Comment on “Unexpected reversal of C ₃ versus C ₄ grass response to elevated CO ₂ during a 20-year field experiment”

   https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau1073  

   Wolf, Julie; Ziska, Lewis (August 2018, Science)