More Like this

1. Interpretable Active Learning

   Phillips, Richard; Chang, Kyu Hyun; Friedler, Sorelle A. (January 2018, Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency)

   Active learning has long been a topic of study in machine learning. However, as increasingly complex and opaque models have become standard practice, the process of active learning, too, has become more opaque. There has been little investigation into interpreting what specific trends and patterns an active learning strategy may be exploring. This work expands on the Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations framework (LIME) to provide explanations for active learning recommendations. We demonstrate how LIME can be used to generate locally faithful explanations for an active learning strategy, and how these explanations can be used to understand how different models and datasets explore a problem space over time. In order to quantify the per-subgroup differences in how an active learning strategy queries spatial regions, we introduce a notion of uncertainty bias (based on disparate impact) to measure the discrepancy in the confidence for a model's predictions between one subgroup and another. Using the uncertainty bias measure, we show that our query explanations accurately reflect the subgroup focus of the active learning queries, allowing for an interpretable explanation of what is being learned as points with similar sources of uncertainty have their uncertainty bias resolved. We demonstrate that this technique can be applied to track uncertainty bias over user-defined clusters or automatically generated clusters based on the source of uncertainty. 

   more » « less
2. Using Polygonal Data Clusters to Investigate LIME

   https://doi.org/10.20533/iSociety.2021.0010  

   He, Jesse; Mazumdar, Subhasish (October 2021, International Conference on Information Society (i-Society 2021))

   While machine learning classifier models become more widely adopted, opaque “black-box” models remain mostly inscrutable for a variety of reasons. Since their applications increasingly involve decisions impacting the lives of humans, there is increasing demand that their predictions be understandable to humans. Of particular interest in eXplainable AI (XAI) is the interpretability of explanations, i.e., that a model’s prediction should be understandable in terms of the input features. One popular approach is LIME, which offers a model-agnostic framework for explaining any classifier. However, questions remain about the limitations and vulnerabilities of such post-hoc explainers. We have built a tool for generating synthetic tabular data sets which enables us to probe the explanation system opportunistically based on its architecture. In this paper, we report on our success in revealing a scenario where LIME’s explanation violates local faithfulness. 

   more » « less
3. Fine-Grained Explanations Using Markov Logic

   Al-Farabi, K.M.; Sarkhel, S.; Dey, S.; Venugopal, D. (January 2019, Fine-Grained Explanations Using Markov LogicMachine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases)

   Explaining the results of Machine learning algorithms is crucial given the rapid growth and potential applicability of these methods in critical domains including healthcare, defense, autonomous driving, etc. In this paper, we address this problem in the context of Markov Logic Networks (MLNs) which are highly expressive statistical relational models that combine first-order logic with probabilistic graphical models. MLNs in general are known to be interpretable models, i.e., MLNs can be understood more easily by humans as compared to models learned by approaches such as deep learning. However, at the same time, it is not straightforward to obtain human-understandable explanations specific to an observed inference result (e.g. marginal probability estimate). This is because, the MLN provides a lifted interpretation, one that generalizes to all possible worlds/instantiations, which are not query/evidence specific. In this paper, we extract grounded-explanations, i.e., explanations defined w.r.t specific inference queries and observed evidence. We extract these explanations from importance weights defined over the MLN formulas that encode the contribution of formulas towards the final inference results. We validate our approach in real world problems related to analyzing reviews from Yelp, and show through user-studies that our explanations are richer than state-of-the-art non-relational explainers such as LIME . 

   more » « less
4. Temporal Concept Tracing: Making Deep Learning PredictionsInterpretable and Actionable for ICU Acute Kidney InjuryPrevention

   https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v7i1.36917  

   Badhon, S_M_Saiful Islam; Bozdag, Serdar; Adibuzzaman, Mohammad; Cleveland, Ana D; Ding, Junhua; Hossain, KSM Tozammel (November 2025, Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium Series)

   Deep learning models have demonstrated impressive accuracy in predicting acute kidney injury (AKI), a condition affecting up to 20% of ICU patients, yet their black-box nature prevents clinical adoption in high-stakes critical care settings. While existing interpretability methods like SHAP, LIME, and attention mechanisms can identify important features, they fail to capture the temporal dynamics essential for clinical decision-making, and are unable to communicate when specific risk factors become critical in a patient's trajectory. This limitation is particularly problematic in the ICU, where the timing of interventions can significantly impact patient outcomes. We present a novel interpretable framework that brings temporal awareness to deep learning predictions for AKI. Our approach introduces three key innovations: (1) a latent convolutional concept bottleneck that learns clinically meaningful patterns from ICU time-series without requiring manual concept annotation, leveraging Conv1D layers to capture localized temporal patterns like sudden physiological changes; (2) Temporal Concept Tracing (TCT), a gradient-based method that identifies not only which risk factors matter but precisely when they become critical addressing the fundamental question of temporal relevance missing from current XAI techniques; and (3) integration with MedAlpaca to generate structured, time-aware clinical explanations that translate model insights into actionable bedside guidance. We evaluate our framework on MIMIC-IV data, demonstrating that our approach performs better than existing explainability frameworks, Occlusion and LIME, in terms of the comprehensiveness score, sufficiency score, and processing time. The proposed method also better captures risk factors inflection points for patients timelines compared to conventional concept bottleneck methods, including dense layer and attention mechanism. This work represents the first comprehensive solution for interpretable temporal deep learning in critical care that addresses both the what and when of clinical risk factors. By making AKI predictions transparent and temporally contextualized, our framework bridges the gap between model accuracy and clinical utility, offering a path toward trustworthy AI deployment in time-sensitive healthcare settings. 

   more » « less
5. Fooling LIME and SHAP: Adversarial Attacks on Post hoc Explanation Methods

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3375627.3375830  

   Slack, Dylan; Hilgard, Sophie; Jia, Emily; Singh, Sameer; Lakkaraju, Himabindu (February 2020, AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES))

   As machine learning black boxes are increasingly being deployed in domains such as healthcare and criminal justice, there is growing emphasis on building tools and techniques for explaining these black boxes in an interpretable manner. Such explanations are being leveraged by domain experts to diagnose systematic errors and underlying biases of black boxes. In this paper, we demonstrate that post hoc explanations techniques that rely on input perturbations, such as LIME and SHAP, are not reliable. Specifically, we propose a novel scaffolding technique that effectively hides the biases of any given classifier by allowing an adversarial entity to craft an arbitrary desired explanation. Our approach can be used to scaffold any biased classifier in such a way that its predictions on the input data distribution still remain biased, but the post hoc explanations of the scaffolded classifier look innocuous. Using extensive evaluation with multiple real world datasets (including COMPAS), we demonstrate how extremely biased (racist) classifiers crafted by our framework can easily fool popular explanation techniques such as LIME and SHAP into generating innocuous explanations which do not reflect the underlying biases. 

   more » « less