Comparative studies of aging are a promising approach to identifying general properties of and processes leading to aging. While to date, many comparative studies of aging in animals have focused on relatively narrow species groups, methodological innovations now allow for studies that include evolutionary distant species. However, comparative studies of aging across a wide range of species that have distinct life histories introduce additional challenges in experimental design. Here, we discuss these challenges, highlight the most pressing problems that need to be solved, and provide suggestions based on current approaches to successfully carry out comparative aging studies across the animal kingdom.
Comparative analysis of coprocessors: Comparative analysis of coprocessors
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10074378
- Publisher / Repository:
- Wiley Blackwell (John Wiley & Sons)
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience
- Volume:
- 31
- Issue:
- 1
- ISSN:
- 1532-0626
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- Article No. e4756
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
Through an examination of three cases of change in the U-2 platform, this paper compares three pathways to changeability: form changes, operational changes, and cyber changes. Each pathway can lead to change in similar properties of a system but have varying levels of performance and time to implement. For each pathway, we describe the design mechanisms necessary to implement change in that pathway. We analyze the trade-off between performance or extent of change and agility or speed of change and find that form changes offer the highest degree of changeability but take the longest time to implement. Operational changes offer the least degree of changeability but are far quicker to implement. Cyber changes lie in between these two pathways. Understanding the design choices needed and the underlying trade-off of each pathway can enable decision-makers to better select a pathway to change when the need arises. This comparative analysis is especially useful since literature has thus far examined each of these pathways in isolation, not as different paths to the same goal.more » « less
-
Online trackers are invasive as they track our digital footprints, many of which are sensitive in nature, and when aggregated over time, they can help infer intricate details about our lifestyles and habits. Although much research has been conducted to understand the effectiveness of existing countermeasures for the desktop platform, little is known about how mobile browsers have evolved to handle online trackers. With mobile devices now generating more web traffic than their desktop counterparts, we fill this research gap through a large-scale comparative analysis of mobile web browsers. We crawl 10K valid websites from the Tranco list on real mobile devices. Our data collection process covers both popular generic browsers (e.g., Chrome, Firefox, and Safari) as well as privacy-focused browsers (e.g., Brave, Duck Duck Go, and Firefox-Focus). We use dynamic analysis of runtime execution traces and static analysis of source codes to highlight the tracking behavior of invasive fingerprinters. We also find evidence of tailored content being served to different browsers. In particular, we note that Firefox Focus sees altered script code, whereas Brave and Duck Duck Go have highly similar content. To test the privacy protection of browsers, we measure the responses of each browser in blocking trackers and advertisers and note the strengths and weaknesses of privacy browsers. To establish ground truth, we use well-known block lists, including EasyList, EasyPrivacy, Disconnect and WhoTracksMe and find that Brave generally blocks the highest number of content that should be blocked as per these lists. Focus performs better against social trackers, and Duck Duck Go restricts third-party trackers that perform email-based tracking.more » « less
