More Like this
-
Protein import into chloroplasts is carried out by the protein translocons at the outer and inner envelope membranes (
TOC andTIC ). Detailed structures for these translocons are lacking, with only a low‐resolutionTOC complex structure available. Recently, we showed that theTOC /TIC translocons can import folded proteins, a rather unique feat for a coupled double membrane system. We also determined the maximum functionalTOC /TIC pore size to be 30–35 Å. Here, we discuss how such large pores could form and compare the structural dynamics of the pore‐forming Toc75 subunit to its bacterial/mitochondrial Omp85 family homologs. We put forward structural models that can be empirically tested and also briefly review the pore dynamics of other protein translocons with known structures. -
Summary A network of peptidases governs proteostasis in plant chloroplasts and mitochondria. This study reveals strong genetic and functional interactions in Arabidopsis between the chloroplast stromal CLP chaperone‐protease system and the PREP1,2 peptidases, which are dually localized to chloroplast stroma and the mitochondrial matrix.
Higher order mutants defective in CLP or PREP proteins were generated and analyzed by quantitative proteomics and N‐terminal proteomics (terminal amine isotopic labeling of substrates (TAILS)).
Strong synergistic interactions were observed between the CLP protease system (
clpr1‐2 ,clpr2‐1 ,clpc1‐1 ,clpt1 ,clpt2) and both PREP homologs (prep1 ,prep2 ) resulting in embryo lethality or growth and developmental phenotypes. Synergistic interactions were observed even when only one of the PREP proteins was lacking, suggesting that PREP1 and PREP2 have divergent substrates. Proteome phenotypes were driven by the loss of CLP protease capacity, with little impact from the PREP peptidases. Chloroplast N‐terminal proteomess howed that many nuclear encoded chloroplast proteins have alternatively processed N‐termini inprep1prep2 ,clpt1clpt2 andprep1prep2clpt1clpt2 .Loss of chloroplast protease capacity interferes with stromal processing peptidase (SPP) activity due to folding stress and low levels of accumulated cleaved cTP fragments. PREP1,2 proteolysis of cleaved cTPs is complemented by unknown proteases. A model for CLP and PREP activity within a hierarchical chloroplast proteolysis network is proposed.
-
SUMMARY Plastids contain their own genomes, which are transcribed by two types of RNA polymerases. One of those enzymes is a bacterial‐type, multi‐subunit polymerase encoded by the plastid genome. The plastid‐encoded RNA polymerase (PEP) is required for efficient expression of genes encoding proteins involved in photosynthesis. Despite the importance of PEP, its DNA binding locations have not been studied on the genome‐wide scale at high resolution. We established a highly specific approach to detect the genome‐wide pattern of PEP binding to chloroplast DNA using plastid chromatin immunoprecipitation–sequencing (ptChIP‐seq). We found that in mature
Arabidopsis thaliana chloroplasts, PEP has a complex DNA binding pattern with preferential association at genes encoding rRNA, tRNA, and a subset of photosynthetic proteins. Sigma factors SIG2 and SIG6 strongly impact PEP binding to a subset of tRNA genes and have more moderate effects on PEP binding throughout the rest of the genome. PEP binding is commonly enriched on gene promoters, around transcription start sites. Finally, the levels of PEP binding to DNA are correlated with levels of RNA accumulation, which demonstrates the impact of PEP on chloroplast gene expression. Presented data are available through a publicly available Plastid Genome Visualization Tool (Plavisto) athttps://plavisto.mcdb.lsa.umich.edu/ .