skip to main content

Title: The terpenoid backbone biosynthesis pathway directly affects the biosynthesis of alarm pheromone in the aphid: Genes related to EβF biosynthesis
Authors:
 ;  
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10075072
Journal Name:
Insect Molecular Biology
ISSN:
0962-1075
Publisher:
Wiley-Blackwell
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Cellulose, the main component of the plant cell wall, provides a stable environment for cells and is the most abundant source of biomass on Earth. Endosidin20 (ES20) is a recently identified cellulose biosynthesis inhibitor (CBI) that targets the catalytic site of plant cellulose synthase (CESA). Here, we screened over 600 ES20 analogs for their inhibitory effects on plant growth and identified nine active analogs named ES20-1 to ES20-9. Among these, Endosidin20-1 (ES20-1) had stronger inhibitory effects on plant growth and cellulose biosynthesis than ES20. Previously identified Arabidopsis thaliana cesa6 alleles that reduce plant sensitivity to ES20 also caused reduced sensitivitymore »to ES20-1 in terms of plant growth. At the biochemical level, we demonstrated that ES20-1, like ES20, directly interacts with CESA6. At the cellular level, this molecule, like ES20, induced the accumulation of cellulose synthase complexes (CSCs) at the Golgi apparatus and inhibited their secretion to the plasma membrane. Like ES20, ES20-1 likely targets the catalytic site of CESA. However, through molecular docking analysis using modeled full-length CESA6 structure, we found that both ES20 and ES20-1 might have another target site at the transmembrane regions of CESA6. Besides ES20, other CBIs such as Isoxaben, C17 and Flupoxam are widely used tools to dissect the mechanism of cellulose biosynthesis and are valuable resources for the development of herbicide. Multiple CESA mutants which are insensitive to these CBIs have been identified. Here, based on mutant genetic analysis and molecular docking analysis, we have identified the potential target sites of these CBIs on modeled CESA structure. Some bacteria also produce cellulose, and both ES20 and ES20-1 inhibited bacterial cellulose biosynthesis. Therefore, we conclude that ES20-1 is a more potent analog of ES20 that inhibits intrinsic cellulose biosynthesis in plants and both ES20 and ES20-1 show inhibitory effect in bacterial growth and cellulose synthesis, making them excellent tools for exploring the mechanisms of cellulose biosynthesis across kingdoms.« less
  2. Abstract Nectar is a primary reward mediating plant–animal mutualisms to improve plant fitness and reproductive success. Four distinct trichomatic nectaries develop in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum), one floral and three extrafloral, and the nectars they secrete serve different purposes. Floral nectar attracts bees for promoting pollination, while extrafloral nectar attracts predatory insects as a means of indirect protection from herbivores. Cotton therefore provides an ideal system for contrasting mechanisms of nectar production and nectar composition between different nectary types. Here, we report the transcriptome and ultrastructure of the four cotton nectary types throughout development and compare these with the metabolomes ofmore »secreted nectars. Integration of these datasets supports specialization among nectary types to fulfill their ecological niche, while conserving parallel coordination of the merocrine-based and eccrine-based models of nectar biosynthesis. Nectary ultrastructures indicate an abundance of rough endoplasmic reticulum positioned parallel to the cell walls and a profusion of vesicles fusing to the plasma membranes, supporting the merocrine model of nectar biosynthesis. The eccrine-based model of nectar biosynthesis is supported by global transcriptomics data, which indicate a progression from starch biosynthesis to starch degradation and sucrose biosynthesis and secretion. Moreover, our nectary global transcriptomics data provide evidence for novel metabolic processes supporting de novo biosynthesis of amino acids secreted in trace quantities in nectars. Collectively, these data demonstrate the conservation of nectar-producing models among trichomatic and extrafloral nectaries.« less