Diffusional dynamics of the donor–acceptor distance are responsible for the appearance of a new time scale of diffusion over the distance of electronic tunneling in electron-transfer reactions. The distance dynamics compete with the medium polarization dynamics in the dynamics-controlled electron-transfer kinetics. The pre-exponential factor of the electron-transfer rate constant switches, at the crossover distance, between a distance-independent, dynamics-controlled plateau and exponential distance decay. The crossover between two regimes is controlled by an effective relaxation time slowed down by a factor exponentially depending on the variance of the donor–acceptor displacement. Flexible donor–acceptor complexes must show a greater tendency for dynamics-controlled electron transfer. Energy chains based on electron transport are best designed by placing the redox cofactors near the crossover distance.
- Award ID(s):
- 1710104
- PAR ID:
- 10088395
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Faraday Discussions
- ISSN:
- 1359-6640
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
-
This study expands and combines concepts from two of our earlier studies. One study reported the complementary halogen bonding and π-π charge transfer complexation observed between isomeric electron rich 4-N,N-dimethylaminophenylethynylpyridines and the electron poor halogen bond donor, 1-(3,5-dinitrophenylethynyl)-2,3,5,6-tetrafluoro-4-iodobenzene while the second study elaborated the ditopic halogen bonding of activated pyrimidines. Leveraging our understanding on the combination of these non-covalent interactions, we describe cocrystallization featuring ditopic halogen bonding and π-stacking. Specifically, red cocrystals are formed between the ditopic electron poor halogen bond donor 1-(3,5-dinitrophenylethynyl)-2,4,6-triflouro-3,5-diiodobenzene and each of electron rich pyrimidines 2- and 5-(4-N,N-dimethyl-aminophenylethynyl)pyrimidine. The X-ray single crystal structures of these cocrystals are described in terms of halogen bonding and electron donor-acceptor π-complexation. Computations confirm that the donor-acceptor π-stacking interactions are consistently stronger than the halogen bonding interactions and that there is cooperativity between π-stacking and halogen bonding in the crystals.more » « less
-
Electron donor–acceptor co-crystals are receiving increasing interest because of their many useful optoelectronic properties. While the steady-state properties of many different co-crystals have been characterized, very few studies have addressed how crystal morphology affects the dynamics of charge transfer (CT) exciton formation, migration, and decay, which are often critical to their performance in device structures. Here we show that co-crystallization of a pyrene (Pyr) electron donor with either N , N ′-bis(2,6-diisopropylphenyl)- or N , N ′-bis(3′-pentyl)-perylene-3,4:9,10-bis(dicarboximide) (diisoPDI or C 5 PDI) electron acceptors, respectively, yields mixed π-stacked Pyr–diisoPDI or Pyr–C 5 PDI donor–acceptor co-crystals. Femtosecond transient absorption microscopy is used to determine the CT exciton dynamics in these single crystals. Fitting the data to a one-dimensional charge transfer CT exciton diffusion model reveals a diffusion constant that is two orders of magnitude higher in the Pyr–diisoPDI co-crystal compared to the Pyr–C 5 PDI co-crystal. By correlating the co-crystal structures to their distinct excited-state dynamics, the effects of each mixed stacked structure on the exciton dynamics and the mechanisms of CT exciton diffusion are elucidated.more » « less
-
more » « less
Abstract Using the popular metal‐ligand axial coordination self‐assembly approach, donor‐acceptor conjugates have been constructed using zinc tetrapyrroles (porphyrin (ZnP), phthalocyanine (ZnPc), and naphthalocyanine (ZnNc)) as electron donors and imidazole functionalized tetracyanobutadiene (Im‐TCBD) and cyclohexa‐2,5‐diene‐1,4‐diylidene‐expanded‐tetracyanobutadiene (Im‐DCNQ) as electron acceptors. The newly formed donor‐acceptor conjugates were fully characterized by a suite of physicochemical methods, including absorption and emission, electrochemistry, and computational methods. The measured binding constants for the 1 : 1 complexes were in the order of 104–105 M−1in o‐dichlorobenzene. Free‐energy calculations and the energy level diagrams revealed the high exergonicity for the excited state electron transfer reactions. However, in the case of the ZnNc:Im‐DCNQ complex, owing to the facile oxidation of ZnNc and facile reduction of Im‐DCNQ, slow electron transfer was witnessed in the dark without the aid of light. Systematic transient pump‐probe studies were performed to secure evidence of excited state charge separation and gather their kinetic parameters. The rate of charge separation was as high as 1011 s−1suggesting efficient processes. These findings show that the present self‐assembly approach could be utilized to build donor‐acceptor constructs with powerful electron acceptors, TCBD and DCNQ, to witness ground and excited state charge transfer, fundamental events required in energy harvesting, and building optoelectronic devices.
-
Two polymer donors, FTAZ and J71 , and two fused-ring electron acceptors, ITIC1 and ITIC2 , are used to investigate the effects of conjugation dimension on the performance of organic solar cells (OSCs). FTAZ and J71 , and ITIC1 and ITIC2 share the same molecular backbone, respectively, while J71 and ITIC2 possess conjugated thienyl side chains. The addition of conjugated side chains slightly red-shifts the absorption spectra and lowers the bandgap due to the extended 2D conjugation. Conjugated side chains on the acceptor induce the self-aggregation of the acceptors, while conjugated side chains on the donor increase the miscibility of the donors and acceptors, thus optimizing the morphology of the active layers. The blends based on mixed combinations, namely 1D donor/2D acceptor and 2D donor/1D acceptor, show better performance relative to 1D donor/1D acceptor and 2D donor/2D acceptor.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1039/C8FD00218E
