More Like this

1. CLIMATE CHANGE AT HIGH LATITUDES: AN ILLUMINATING EXAMPLE: with Karl E. Peters, “Living with the Wicked Problem of Climate Change”; Paul H. Carr, “What Is Climate Change Doing to Us and for Us?”; James Clement van Pelt, “Climate Change in Context: Stress, Shock, and the Crucible of Livingkind”; Robert S. Pickart, “Climate Change at High Latitudes: An Illuminating Example”; Emily E. Austin, “Soil Carbon Transformations”; David A. Larrabee, “Climate Change and Conflicting Future Visions”; Panu Pihkala, “Eco‐Anxiety, Tragedy, and Hope: Psychological and Spiritual Dimensions of Climate Change”; Carol Wayne White, “Re‐Envisioning Hope: Anthropogenic Climate Change, Learned Ignorance, and Religious Naturalism”; Matthew Fox, “Climate Change, Laudato Si ', Creation Spirituality, and the Nobility of the Scientist's Vocation”; Christopher Volpe, “Art and Climate Change: Contemporary Artists Respond to Global Crisis”; Jim Rubens, “The Wicked Problem of Our Failing Social Compact”; and Peter L. Kelley, “Crossing the Divide: Lessons from Developing Wind Energy in Post‐Fact America.”

   https://doi.org/10.1111/zygo.12406  

   Pickart, Robert S. ( May 2018 , Zygon®)

   A striking example is presented of a newly observed phenomenon in the ice‐covered Arctic Ocean that appears to be a consequence of changes in the physical forcing. In summer 2011, a massive phytoplankton bloom was observed north of the Bering Strait, between Russia and the United States, underneath pack ice that was a meter thick—in conditions previously thought to be inconducive for harboring such blooms. It is demonstrated that the changing ice cover, in concert with the resulting heat exchange between the atmosphere and ocean, likely led to this paradigm shift at the base of the food chain by altering the supply of nutrients and sunlight. Such early‐season under‐ice blooms have the potential to profoundly alter the Arctic food web.

    

   more » « less
2. Why Don't They Just Change? Contract Farming, Informational Influence, and Barriers to Agricultural Climate Change Mitigation: Agricultural Climate Change Mitigation

   https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12122  

   Schewe, Rebecca L. ; Stuart, Diana ( June 2017 , Rural Sociology)
3. Guiding change in higher education: an emergent, iterative application of Kotter’s change model

   https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1741540  

   Kang, Sung Pil ; Chen, Yan ; Svihla, Vanessa ; Gallup, Amber ; Ferris, Kristen ; Datye, Abhaya K. ( January 2020 , Studies in Higher Education)

   null (Ed.)
4. Coupled Adaptive Cycles of Shoreline Change and Households in Deltaic Bangladesh: Analysis of a 30-Year Shoreline Change Record and Recent Population Impacts

   https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2020.1799746  

   Crawford, Thomas W. ; Rahman, Munshi Khaledur ; Miah, Md. Giashuddin ; Islam, Md. Rafiqul ; Paul, Bimal Kanti ; Curtis, Scott ; Islam, Md. Sariful ( June 2021 , Annals of the American Association of Geographers)

   null (Ed.)
5. Change in US state-level public opinion about climate change: 2008–2020

   https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aca702  

   Marlon, Jennifer R ; Wang, Xinran ; Bergquist, Parrish ; Howe, Peter D ; Leiserowitz, Anthony ; Maibach, Edward ; Mildenberger, Matto ; Rosenthal, Seth ( December 2022 , Environmental Research Letters)

   Abstract Public attitudes toward climate change influence climate and energy policies and guide individual mitigation and adaptation behaviors. Over the last decade, as scientific certainty about the causes and impacts of, and solutions to the climate crisis has increased, cities, states, and regions in the United States have pursued diverse policy strategies. Yet, our understanding of how Americans’ climate views are changing remains largely limited to national trends. Here we use a large US survey dataset ( N = 27 075 ) to estimate dynamic, state-level changes in 16 climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and policy preferences over 13 years (2008–2020). We find increases in global warming issue importance and perceived harm in every state. Policy support, however, increased in more liberal states like California and New York, but remained stable elsewhere. Year-by-year estimates of state-level climate opinions can be used to support sub-national mitigation and adaptation efforts that depend on public support and engagement. 

   more » « less