More Like this

1. Robustness of Conditional GANs to Noisy Labels

   Thekumparampil, Kiran Koshy; Khetan, Ashish; Lin, Zinan; Oh, Sewoong (December 2018, Advances in neural information processing systems)

   We study the problem of learning conditional generators from noisy labeled samples, where the labels are corrupted by random noise. A standard training of conditional GANs will not only produce samples with wrong labels, but also generate poor quality samples. We consider two scenarios, depending on whether the noise model is known or not. When the distribution of the noise is known, we introduce a novel architecture which we call Robust Conditional GAN (RCGAN). The main idea is to corrupt the label of the generated sample before feeding to the adversarial discriminator, forcing the generator to produce samples with clean labels. This approach of passing through a matching noisy channel is justified by corresponding multiplicative approximation bounds between the loss of the RCGAN and the distance between the clean real distribution and the generator distribution. This shows that the proposed approach is robust, when used with a carefully chosen discriminator architecture, known as projection discriminator. When the distribution of the noise is not known, we provide an extension of our architecture, which we call RCGAN-U, that learns the noise model simultaneously while training the generator. We show experimentally on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets that both the approaches consistently improve upon baseline approaches, and RCGAN-U closely matches the performance of RCGAN. 

   more » « less
2. How does a Neural Network's Architecture Impact its Robustness to Noisy Labels?

   Li, Jingling; Zhang, Mozhi; Xu, Keyulu; Dickerson, John P; Ba, Jimmy (January 2021, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34)

   Noisy labels are inevitable in large real-world datasets. In this work, we explore an area understudied by previous works --- how the network's architecture impacts its robustness to noisy labels. We provide a formal framework connecting the robustness of a network to the alignments between its architecture and target/noise functions. Our framework measures a network's robustness via the predictive power in its representations --- the test performance of a linear model trained on the learned representations using a small set of clean labels. We hypothesize that a network is more robust to noisy labels if its architecture is more aligned with the target function than the noise. To support our hypothesis, we provide both theoretical and empirical evidence across various neural network architectures and different domains. We also find that when the network is well-aligned with the target function, its predictive power in representations could improve upon state-of-the-art (SOTA) noisy-label-training methods in terms of test accuracy and even outperform sophisticated methods that use clean labels. 

   more » « less
3. Peer Loss Functions: Learning from Noisy Labels without Knowing Noise Rates

   Liu, Yang; Guo, Hongyi (January 2020, Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning)

   Daumé III, Hal; Singh, Aarti (Ed.)

   Learning with noisy labels is a common challenge in supervised learning. Existing approaches often require practitioners to specify noise rates, i.e., a set of parameters controlling the severity of label noises in the problem, and the specifications are either assumed to be given or estimated using additional steps. In this work, we introduce a new family of loss functions that we name as peer loss functions, which enables learning from noisy labels and does not require a priori specification of the noise rates. Peer loss functions work within the standard empirical risk minimization (ERM) framework. We show that, under mild conditions, performing ERM with peer loss functions on the noisy data leads to the optimal or a near-optimal classifier as if performing ERM over the clean training data, which we do not have access to. We pair our results with an extensive set of experiments. Peer loss provides a way to simplify model development when facing potentially noisy training labels, and can be promoted as a robust candidate loss function in such situations. 

   more » « less
4. Agree to Disagree: Robust Anomaly Detection with Noisy Labels

   https://doi.org/10.1145/3709657  

   Hofmann, Dennis M; VanNostrand, Peter M; Ma, Lei; Zhang, Huayi; DeOliveira, Joshua C; Cao, Lei; Rundensteiner, Elke A (February 2025, Proceedings of the ACM on Management of Data)

   Due to the scarcity of reliable anomaly labels, recent anomaly detection methods leveraging noisy auto-generated labels either select clean samples or refurbish noisy labels. However, both approaches struggle due to the unique properties of anomalies.Sample selectionoften fails to separate sufficiently many clean anomaly samples from noisy ones, whilelabel refurbishmenterroneously refurbishesmarginalclean samples. To overcome these limitations, we design Unity, thefirstlearning from noisy labels (LNL) approach for anomaly detection that elegantly leverages the merits of both sample selection and label refurbishment to iteratively prepare a diverse clean sample set for network training. Unity uses a pair of deep anomaly networks to collaboratively select samples with clean labels based on prediction agreement, followed by a disagreement resolution mechanism to capture marginal samples with clean labels. Thereafter, Unity utilizes unique properties of anomalies to design an anomaly-centric contrastive learning strategy that accurately refurbishes the remaining noisy labels. The resulting set, composed ofselected and refurbishedclean samples, will be used to train the anomaly networks in the next training round. Our experimental study on 10 real-world benchmark datasets demonstrates that Unity consistently outperforms state-of-the-art LNL techniques by up to 0.31 in F-1 Score (0.52 \rightarrow 0.83). 

   more » « less
5. Label-Retrieval-Augmented Diffusion Models for Learning from Noisy Labels

   Chen, Jian; Zhang, Ruiyi; Yu, Tong; Sharma, Rohan; Xu, Zhiqiang; Sun, Tong; Chen, Changyou (December 2023, Curran Associates, Inc.)

   Oh, A; Naumann, T; Globerson, A; Saenko, K; Hardt, M; Levine, S (Ed.)

   Learning from noisy labels is a long-standing problem in machine learning for real applications. One of the main research lines focuses on learning a label corrector to purify potential noisy labels. However, these methods typically rely on strict assumptions and are limited to certain types of label noise. In this paper, we reformulate the label-noise problem from a generative-model perspective, i.e., labels are generated by gradually refining an initial random guess. This new perspective immediately enables existing powerful diffusion models to seamlessly learn the stochastic generative process. Once the generative uncertainty is modeled, we can perform classification inference using maximum likelihood estimation of labels. To mitigate the impact of noisy labels, we propose Label-Retrieval- Augmented (LRA) diffusion model 1, which leverages neighbor consistency to effectively construct pseudo-clean labels for diffusion training. Our model is flexible and general, allowing easy incorporation of different types of conditional information, e.g., use of pre-trained models, to further boost model performance. Extensive experiments are conducted for evaluation. Our model achieves new state-of-the-art (SOTA) results on all standard real-world benchmark datasets. Remarkably, by incorporating conditional information from the powerful CLIP model, our method can boost the current SOTA accuracy by 10-20 absolute points in many cases. 

   more » « less