An official website of the United States government
Problem solving is a signature skill of engineers. Incorporating videos in engineering education has potential to stimulate multi-senses and further open new ways of learning and thinking. Here, problem solving was examined on problems written by previous students that applied course concepts by reverse engineering the actions in videos. Since the videos usually come from YouTube, the student-written problems are designated YouTube problems. This research focused on examining the rigor of YouTube problems as well as students’ problem-solving skills when solving YouTube problems compared to Textbook problems. A quasi-experimental, treatment/control group design was employed, and data collected was evaluated using multiple instruments. NASA Task Load Index survey was used to collect 1200 ratings that assessed rigor of homework problems. Problem-solving ability was assessed using a previously-developed rubric with over 2600 student solutions scored. In the treatment group where students were assigned ten Textbook and nine YouTube problems, students reported an overall similarity in rigor for both YouTube and Textbook problems. Students in the treatment group displayed 6% better problem solving when completing YouTube problems compared to Textbook problems. Although higher perceptions of problem difficulty correlated with lower problem-solving ability across both groups and problem types, students in the treatment group exhibited smaller decreases in problem-solving ability as a result of increasing difficulty in the Textbook problems. Overall, student-written problems inspired by YouTube videos can easily be adapted as homework practice and possess potential benefits in enhancing students’ learning experience. Link: https://www.ijee.ie/contents/c370521.html
more »
« less
Using a Hybrid of Argumentation and Problem Solving Prompts to Facilitate Undergraduates' Problem Solving Performance and Confidence
Educational reform documents in the U.S. promote the incorporation of argumentation in science and engineering as a 21st century learning skill. Our aim was to infuse argumentation in a calculus-based physics course for future scientists and engineers. We conducted a study in a problem solving recitation session of the course. All students were asked to solve the same problem and were provided prompts to structure their solutions. The intervention condition was required to justify their solution procedure prior to solving the problem. Results showed that the intervention condition had a greater proportion of correct solutions, higher confidence in their approach, and were more likely to suggest alternative approaches to solving the problem than students in the control condition.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1712201
- PAR ID:
- 10105931
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The 13th Conference of the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA)
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)Faculty often utilize homework problems as a means to help students practice problem solving. Recently, with textbook solutions manuals being freely available online, students are prone to copying/cheating, which can severely limit improvements in problem solving. One hypothesis is that YouTube problems could serve as alternatives to textbook problems to significantly reduce cheating and promote better problem solving. YouTube problems are student-written problems that were inspired by events in a video publicly available online. While our previous studies have showcased positive attitudes related to engineering, high engagement, and rigor of the YouTube problems, the current study examines a subset of problems related to one major course topic, namely vapor-liquid equilibrium. The cohorts include engineering students from a public university who were assigned homework problems as part of a material and energy balance course. Two constructs were explored: problem solving and perception of problem difficulty. The study adopted an established and validated rubric to quantify performance in relevant stages of problem solving, including problem identification, representation, organization, calculation, solution completion, and solution accuracy. While problem solving can be influenced by perception of problem difficulty, the widely used NASA Task Load Index was adopted to measure the problem rigor. This paper will compare textbook and YouTube problem with respect to overall problem-solving ability as well as in each stage of problem solving. Furthermore, we will investigate whether disparities exist in students’ perceptions when solving vapor-liquid equilibrium problems.more » « less
-
Problem solving is a signature skill of engineers. Here, problem solving is employed when students apply course concepts to reverse engineer YouTube videos and solve new student-written, homework-style problems (YouTube problems). Replacing textbook problems with YouTube problems, this research focuses on examining the rigor of YouTube problems as well as students’ problem-solving skills on textbook and YouTube problems. A quasi-experimental, treatment/control group design was employed, and data was collected and evaluated using multiple measurement instruments. First, rigor of homework problems was examined using the NASA Task Load Index. Also, problem solving was assessed using a previously-developed rubric called PROCESS: Problem definition, Representing the problem, Organizing the information, Calculations, Evaluating the solution, Solution communication, and Self-assessment. PROCESS was modified to independently measure completeness and accuracy of student responses, as well as identify errors committed in material and energy balances. In the treatment group, students were assigned ten textbook problems and nine YouTube problems. While the control group obtained higher PROCESS scores at the beginning of the study, both groups exhibited similar problem-solving skills near the end. Also, the rigor of student-written YouTube problems was similar to textbook problems related to the same course concepts.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Complex problem-solving is a vital skill prevalent to thrive in the workforce along with creativity and conceptual thinking. Homework problems allow engineering students to practice problem solving, and writing new problems can be a creative process for students. Our previous research found that implementing alternative, student-written homework problems, referred to as YouTube problems, led to better learning attitudes. YouTube problems are course related; homework-quality problems generated by reverse engineering publicly available videos. Comparing learning experiences of students solving YouTube versus Textbook problems is the focus of the current study. Impacts of solving YouTube problems are examined based on perception of difficulty as well as students’ problem-solving skills displayed by students. To enable testing, students were assigned one textbook and three YouTube problems. Perception of problem difficulty across problems was examined using the NASA Task Load Index. Additionally, problem solving aptitudes while solving homework problems was assessed using a previously validated rubric called PROCESS: Problem definition, Representing the problem, Organizing the information, Calculations, Solution completion, and Solution accuracy. A new case study compares Textbook and YouTube problems related to reacting systems with recycle, which is one of the most difficult course concepts. A correlation between problem rigor and problem solving was found.more » « less
-
Recently there have been calls to integrate engineering design experiences to support students’ scientific understanding. There is a need for instructional strategies in which learners are encouraged to identify and reflect on ways scientific principles can be applied to inform their designs and evaluate alternative designs. Studies show that the inclusion of contrasting cases can improve students’ conceptual understanding and reasoning. Yet, such tasks depend on how they are scaffolded. In this study, pre-service elementary teachers in a conceptual physics course analyzed contrasting solutions to a design problem. Two forms of scaffolds were embedded to facilitate case evaluation: 1) identify similarities and differences and 2) evaluate and produce an argument for a “good” design solution. We investigated the scientific ideas that the participants used as they contrasted multiple design solutions and the impact of the two approaches in students’ understanding of heat transfer. We found no significant differences in students’ conceptual understanding, but the argumentation condition had a significantly larger number of scientific ideas ‘cited’, ‘explained’ or ‘applied’ in their solutions,. The results suggest that contrasting designs with argumentation may be a promising intervention to facilitate students to use science concepts in engineering design. Future work is needed in order to investigate better scaffolds that can help students’ increase in conceptual learning.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- The DOI is not currently available.
