More Like this

1. Exploring the Perturbed Milky Way Disk and the Substructures of the Outer Disk

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/abc2cb  

   Xu, Y. ; Liu, C. ; Tian, H. ; Newberg, H. J. ; Laporte, C. F. ; Zhang, B. ; Wang, H. F. ; Fu, X. ; Li, J. ; Deng, L. C. ( December 2020 , The Astrophysical Journal)
2. A 100 au Wide Bipolar Rotating Shell Emanating from the HH 212 Protostellar Disk: A Disk Wind?

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aaae6d  

   Lee, Chin-Fei ; Li, Zhi-Yun ; Codella, Claudio ; Ho, Paul T. ; Podio, Linda ; Hirano, Naomi ; Shang, Hsien ; Turner, Neal J. ; Zhang, Qizhou ( March 2018 , The Astrophysical Journal)
3. The VLA Nascent Disk and Multiplicity Survey of Perseus Protostars (VANDAM). IV. Free–Free Emission from Protostars: Links to Infrared Properties, Outflow Tracers, and Protostellar Disk Masses

   https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aaceae  

   Tychoniec, Łukasz ; Tobin, John J. ; Karska, Agata ; Chandler, Claire ; Dunham, Michael M. ; Harris, Robert J. ; Kratter, Kaitlin M. ; Li, Zhi-Yun ; Looney, Leslie W. ; Melis, Carl ; et al ( October 2018 , The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series)
4. Rapid Evolution of Volatile CO from the Protostellar Disk Stage to the Protoplanetary Disk Stage

   https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ab7823  

   Zhang, Ke ; Schwarz, Kamber R. ; Bergin, Edwin A. ( March 2020 , The Astrophysical Journal)
5. Constraining disk evolution prescriptions of planet population synthesis models with observed disk masses and accretion rates

   https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201936488  

   Manara, C. F. ; Mordasini, C. ; Testi, L. ; Williams, J. P. ; Miotello, A. ; Lodato, G. ; Emsenhuber, A. ( November 2019 , Astronomy & Astrophysics)

   While planets are commonly discovered around main-sequence stars, the processes leading to their formation are still far from being understood. Current planet population synthesis models, which aim to describe the planet formation process from the protoplanetary disk phase to the time exoplanets are observed, rely on prescriptions for the underlying properties of protoplanetary disks where planets form and evolve. The recent development in measuring disk masses and disk-star interaction properties, i.e., mass accretion rates, in large samples of young stellar objects demand a more careful comparison between the models and the data. We performed an initial critical assessment of the assumptions made by planet synthesis population models by looking at the relation between mass accretion rates and disk masses in the models and in the currently available data. We find that the currently used disk models predict mass accretion rate in line with what is measured, but with a much lower spread of values than observed. This difference is mainly because the models have a smaller spread of viscous timescales than what is needed to reproduce the observations. We also find an overabundance of weakly accreting disks in the models where giant planets have formed with respect to observations ofmore »typical disks. We suggest that either fewer giant planets have formed in reality or that the prescription for planet accretion predicts accretion on the planets that is too high. Finally, the comparison of the properties of transition disks with large cavities confirms that in many of these objects the observed accretion rates are higher than those predicted by the models. On the other hand, PDS70, a transition disk with two detected giant planets in the cavity, shows mass accretion rates well in line with model predictions.« less