skip to main content
Explore Scholarly Publications and Datasets in the NSF-PAR

Title: Artifact propagation in electrocorticography stimulation
Introduction:Current brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) primarily rely on visual feedback. However, visual feedback may not be sufficient for applications such as movement restoration, where somatosensory feedback plays a crucial role. For electrocorticography (ECoG)-based BCIs, somatosensory feedback can be elicited by cortical surface electro-stimulation [1]. However, simultaneous cortical stimulation and recording is challenging due to stimulation artifacts. Depending on the orientation of stimulating electrodes, their distance to the recording site, and the stimulation intensity, these artifacts may overwhelm the neural signals of interest and saturate the recording bioamplifiers, making it impossible to recover the underlying information [2]. To understand how these factors affect artifact propagation, we performed a preliminary characterization of ECoG signals during cortical stimulation.Materials/Methods/ResultsECoG electrodes were implanted in a 39-year old epilepsy patient as shown in Fig. 1. Pairs of adjacent electrodes were stimulated as a part of language cortical mapping. For each stimulating pair, a charge-balanced biphasic square pulse train of current at 50 Hz was delivered for five seconds at 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 mA. ECoG signals were recorded at 512 Hz. The signals were then high-pass filtered (≥1.5 Hz, zero phase), and the 5-second stimulation epochs were segmented. Within each epoch, artifact-induced peaks were detected for each electrode, except the stimulating pair, where signals were clipped due to amplifier saturation. more » These peaks were phase-locked across electrodes and were 20 ms apart, thus matching the pulse train frequency. The response was characterized by calculating the median peak within the 5-second epochs. Fig. 1 shows a representative response of the right temporal grid (RTG), with the stimulation channel at RTG electrodes 14 and 15. It also shows a hypothetical amplifier saturation contour of an implantable, bi-directional, ECoG-based BCI prototype [2], assuming the supply voltage of 2.2 V and a gain of 66 dB. Finally, we quantify the worstcase scenario by calculating the largest distance between the saturation contour and the midpoint of each stimulating channel.Discussion:Our results indicate that artifact propagation follows a dipole potential distribution with the extent of the saturation region (the interior of the white contour) proportional to the stimulation amplitude. In general, the artifacts propagated farthest when a 10 mA current was applied with the saturation regions extending from 17 to 32 mm away from the midpoint of the dipole. Consistent with the electric dipole model, this maximum spread happened along the direction of the dipole moment. An exception occurred at stimulation channel RTG11-16, for which an additional saturation contour emerged away from the dipole contour (not shown), extending the saturation region to 41 mm. Also, the worst-case scenario was observed at 6 mA stimulation amplitude. This departure could be a sign of a nonlinear, switch-like behavior, wherein additional conduction pathways could become engaged in response to sufficiently high stimulation.Significance:While ECoG stimulation is routinely performed in the clinical setting, quantitative studies of the resulting signals are lacking. Our preliminary study demonstrates that stimulation artifacts largely obey dipole distributions, suggesting that the dipole model could be used to predict artifact propagation. Further studies are necessary to ascertain whether these results hold across other subjects and combinations of stimulation/recording grids. Once completed, these studies will reveal practical design constraints for future implantable bi-directional ECoG-based BCIs. These include parameters such as the distances between and relative orientations of the stimulating and recording electrodes, the choice of the stimulating electrodes, the optimal placement of the reference electrode, and the maximum stimulation amplitude. These findings would also have important implications for the design of custom, low-power bioamplifiers for implantable bi-directional ECoG-based BCIs.References:[1] Hiremath, S. V., et al. "Human perception of electrical stimulation on the surface of somatosensory cortex." PloS one 12.5 (2017): e0176020.[2] Rouse, A. G., et al. "A chronic generalized bi-directional brain-machine interface." Journal of Neural Engineering 8.3 (2011): 036018 « less
Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Award ID(s):
1646275
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10108390
Journal Name:
Seventh International BCI Meeting, Abstract Book
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
220 - 222
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , 2018 40th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC))
    Bi-directional brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) require simultaneous stimulation and recording to achieve closed-loop operation. It is therefore important that the interface be able to distinguish between neural signals of interest and stimulation artifacts. Current bi-directional BCIs address this problem by temporally multiplexing stimulation and recording. This approach, however, is suboptimal in many BCI applications. Alternative artifact mitigation methods can be devised by investigating the mechanics of artifact propagation. To characterize stimulation artifact behaviors, we collected and analyzed electrocorticography (ECoG) data from eloquent cortex mapping. Ratcheting and phase-locking of stimulation artifacts were observed, as well as dipole-like properties. Artifacts as large as ±1,100 μV appeared as far as 15-37 mm away from the stimulating channel when stimulating at 10 mA. Analysis also showed that the majority of the artifact power was concentrated at the stimulation pulse train frequency (50 Hz) and its super-harmonics (100, 150, 200 Hz). Lower frequencies (0-32 Hz) experienced minimal artifact contamination. These findings could inform the design of future bi-directional ECoG-based BCIs.
  2. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , 2019 9th International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering (NER))
    Fully-implantable, bi-directional brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) necessitate simultaneous cortical recording and stimulation. This is challenging since electrostimulation of cortical tissue typically causes strong artifacts that may saturate ultra-low power (ULP) analog front-ends of fully-implantable BCIs. To address this problem, we propose an efficient hardware-based method for artifact suppression that employs an auxiliary stimulator with polarity opposite to that of the primary stimulator. The feasibility of this method was explored first in simulations, and then experimentally with brain phantom tissue and electrocorticogram (ECoG) electrode grids. We find that the canceling stimulator can reduce stimulation artifacts below the saturation limit of a typical ULP front-end, while delivering only ~10% of the primary stimulator's voltage.
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , IEEE Signal Processing in Medicine and Biology Symposium SPMB)
    Obeid, Iyad ; Selesnick, Ivan ; Picone, Joseph (Ed.)
    The Neural Engineering Data Consortium has recently developed a new subset of its popular open source EEG corpus – TUH EEG (TUEG) [1]. The TUEG Corpus is the world’s largest open source corpus of EEG data and currently has over 3,300 subscribers. There are several valuable subsets of this data, including the TUH Seizure Detection Corpus (TUSZ) [2], which was featured in the Neureka 2020 Epilepsy Challenge [3]. In this poster, we present a new subset of the TUEG Corpus – the TU Artifact Corpus. This corpus contains 310 EEG files in which every artifact has been annotated. This data can be used to evaluate artifact reduction technology. Since TUEG is comprised of actual clinical data, the set of artifacts appearing in the data is rich and challenging. EEG artifacts are defined as waveforms that are not of cerebral origin and may be affected by numerous external and or physiological factors. These extraneous signals are often mistaken for seizures due to their morphological similarity in amplitude and frequency [4]. Artifacts often lead to raised false alarm rates in machine learning systems, which poses a major challenge for machine learning research. Most state-of-the-art systems use some form of artifact reduction technologymore »to suppress these events. The corpus was annotated using a five-way classification that was developed to meet the needs of our constituents. Brief descriptions of each form of the artifact are provided in Ochal et al. [4]. The five basic tags are: • Chewing (CHEW): An artifact resulting from the tensing and relaxing of the jaw muscles. Chewing is a subset of the muscle artifact class. Chewing has the same characteristic high frequency sharp waves with 0.5 sec baseline periods between bursts. This artifact is generally diffuse throughout the different regions of the brain. However, it might have a higher level of activity in one hemisphere. Classification of a muscle artifact as chewing often depends on whether the accompanying patient report mentions any chewing, since other muscle artifacts can appear superficially similar to chewing artifact. • Electrode (ELEC): An electrode artifact encompasses various electrode related artifacts. Electrode pop is an artifact characterized by channels using the same electrode “spiking” with an electrographic phase reversal. Electrostatic is an artifact caused by movement or interference of electrodes and or the presence of dissimilar metals. A lead artifact is caused by the movement of electrodes from the patient’s head and or poor connection of electrodes. This results in disorganized and high amplitude slow waves. • Eye Movement (EYEM): A spike-like waveform created during patient eye movement. This artifact is usually found on all of the frontal polar electrodes with occasional echoing on the frontal electrodes. • Muscle (MUSC): A common artifact with high frequency, sharp waves corresponding to patient movement. These waveforms tend to have a frequency above 30 Hz with no specific pattern, often occurring because of agitation in the patient. • Shiver (SHIV): A specific and sustained sharp wave artifact that occurs when a patient shivers, usually seen on all or most channels. Shivering is a relatively rare subset of the muscle artifact class. Since these artifacts can overlap in time, a concatenated label format was implemented as a compromise between the limitations of our annotation tool and the complexity needed in an annotation data structure used to represent these overlapping events. We distribute an XML format that easily handles overlapping events. Our annotation tool [5], like most annotation tools of this type, is limited to displaying and manipulating a flat or linear annotation. Therefore, we encode overlapping events as a series of concatenated names using symbols such as: • EYEM+CHEW: eye movement and chewing • EYEM+SHIV: eye movement and shivering • CHEW+SHIV: chewing and shivering An example of an overlapping annotation is shown below in Figure 1. This release is an update of TUAR v1.0.0, which was a partially annotated database. In v1.0.0, a similar five way system was used as well as an additional “null” tag. The “null” tag covers anything that was not annotated, including instances of artifact. Only a limited number of artifacts were annotated in v1.0.0. In this updated version, every instance of an artifact is annotated; ultimately, this provides the user with confidence that any part of the record that is not annotated with one of the five classes does not contain an artifact. No new files, patients, or sessions were added in v2.0.0. However, the data was reannotated with these standards. The total number of files remains the same, but the number of artifact events increases significantly. Complete statistics will be provided on the corpus once annotation is complete and the data is released. This is expected to occur in early July – just after the IEEE SPMB submission deadline. The TUAR Corpus is an open-source database that is currently available for use by any registered member of our consortium. To register and receive access, please follow the instructions provided at this web page: https://www.isip.piconepress.com/projects/tuh_eeg/html/downloads.shtml. The data is located here: https://www.isip.piconepress.com/projects/tuh_eeg/downloads/tuh_eeg_artifact/v2.0.0/.« less
  4. ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; et al ( , Scientific Reports)
    Abstract

    Electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs) generated in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) contain features that may be useful for titrating deep brain stimulation (DBS) therapy for Parkinson’s disease. Delivering a strong therapeutic effect with DBS therapies, however, relies on selectively targeting neural pathways to avoid inducing side effects. In this study, we investigated the spatiotemporal features of ECAPs in and around the STN across parameter sweeps of stimulation current amplitude, pulse width, and electrode configuration, and used a linear classifier of ECAP responses to predict electrode location. Four non-human primates were implanted unilaterally with either a directional (n = 3) or non-directional (n = 1) DBS lead targeting the sensorimotor STN. ECAP responses were characterized by primary features (within 1.6 ms after a stimulus pulse) and secondary features (between 1.6 and 7.4 ms after a stimulus pulse). Using these features, a linear classifier was able to accurately differentiate electrodes within the STN versus dorsal to the STN in all four subjects. ECAP responses varied systematically with recording and stimulating electrode locations, which provides a subject-specific neuroanatomical basis for selecting electrode configurations in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease with DBS therapy.

  5. ; ; ( , Journal of Neural Engineering)
    Abstract

    Objective. There has been growing interest in understanding multisensory integration in the cortex through activation of multiple sensory and motor pathways to treat brain disorders, such as tinnitus or essential tremors. For tinnitus, previous studies show that combined sound and body stimulation can modulate the auditory pathway and lead to significant improvements in tinnitus symptoms. Considering that tinnitus is a type of chronic auditory pain, bimodal stimulation could potentially alter activity in the somatosensory pathway relevant for treating chronic pain. As an initial step towards that goal, we mapped and characterized neuromodulation effects in the somatosensory cortex (SC) in response to sound and/or electrical stimulation of the body.Approach.We first mapped the topographic organization of activity across the SC of ketamine-anesthetized guinea pigs through electrical stimulation of different body locations using subcutaneous needle electrodes or with broadband acoustic stimulation. We then characterized how neural activity in different parts of the SC could be facilitated or suppressed with bimodal stimulation.Main results. The topography in the SC of guinea pigs in response to electrical stimulation of the body aligns consistently to that shown in previous rodent studies. Interestingly, auditory broadband noise stimulation primarily excited SC areas that typically respond to stimulation ofmore »lower body locations. Although there was only a small subset of SC locations that were excited by acoustic stimulation alone, all SC recording sites could be altered (facilitated or suppressed) with bimodal stimulation. Furthermore, specific regions of the SC could be modulated by stimulating an appropriate body region combined with broadband noise.Significance. These findings show that bimodal stimulation can excite or modulate firing across a widespread yet targeted population of SC neurons. This approach may provide a non-invasive method for altering or disrupting abnormal firing patterns within certain parts of the SC for chronic pain treatment.

    « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email