<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Latest Cosmic Ray Results from IceTop and IceCube</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>01/01/2019</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10109413</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1051/epjconf/201921003005</idno>
					<title level='j'>EPJ Web of Conferences</title>
<idno>2100-014X</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">210</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue"></biblScope>					

					<author>Karen Andeen</author><author>Matthias Plum</author><author>I. Lhenry-Yvon</author><author>J. Biteau</author><author>O. Deligny</author><author>P. Ghia</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[The IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the geographic South Pole, with its surface array IceTop, detects three different components of extensive air showers: the total signal at the surface, low energy muons on the periphery of the showers, and high energy muons in the deep In Ice array of IceCube. These measurements enable determination of the energy spectrum and composition of cosmic rays from PeV to EeV energies, the anisotropy in the distribution of cosmic ray arrival directions, the muon density of cosmic ray air showers, and the PeV gamma-ray flux. Furthermore, IceTop can be used as a veto for the neutrino measurements. The latest results from these IceTop analyses will be presented along with future plans.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1">Introduction to Cosmic Ray Physics with the IceCube Neutrino Observatory</head><p>The IceCube Neutrino Observatory at the geographic South Pole, completed in December of 2010, is not only a world-class neutrino observatory but is also an excellent instrument to study cosmic rays. IceCube includes multiple detector components, as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">1</ref>. The IceCube-InIce array consists of 86 strings buried beneath the surface of the Antarctic ice sheet to a depth of 2500 m. Below a depth of 1500 m, these strings are instrumented with 60 digital optical modules (DOMs) apiece <ref type="bibr">[1]</ref>. The DOMs are designed to detect the Cherenkov light emitted by charged particles traversing the ice <ref type="bibr">[2]</ref>. The strings are arranged in a triangular grid with &#8764;125 m separation, as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">2</ref>. Each IceCube-InIce string is topped with two ice-Cherenkov tanks separated by 10 m. These two tanks are referred to as a station, and all the surface stations together comprise the IceTop array <ref type="bibr">[3]</ref>. Each tank is viewed by two DOMs apiece, one running at low gain, the other at high gain, to maximize the dynamic range.</p><p>Both the IceTop and IceCube-InIce DOMs are fully integrated into the data acquisition system of the observatory.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2">Observation Modes for Cosmic Ray Studies Using IceTop and IceCube-InIce</head><p>Since the IceTop and the IceCube-InIce arrays can be operated independently or in coincidence, there are a number of different cosmic ray studies that can be performed utilizing those three possible observation modes. We begin with a discussion of each observation mode: the analyses are discussed in the next sections. * e-mail: karen.andeen@marquette.edu </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1">Studies using the IceTop Array alone</head><p>As discussed in <ref type="bibr">[3]</ref>, when six tanks in three stations register a signal in coincidence, the IceTop surface array is triggered and the signals from all tanks and the deep-ice detectors are preserved. IceTop data from each air shower event are then reconstructed using a maximum-likelihood procedure to fit the shape and normalization of a lateral distribution function (LDF) of the deposited charges. This reconstruction algorithm takes into account arrival time fluctuations and results in the fitted shower core position (x, y, z), direction (&#952;, &#966;), and (S 125 , &#946;) . Here, &#946; is related to the slope of the LDF, while S 125 is the "shower size" parameter, the result of the LDF fit to the signal strength measured in vertical equivalent muons (VEM) at a reference distance of 125 m perpendicular to the shower axis, as shown in Figure <ref type="figure">3</ref>. At this distance, the shower size</p></div><note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_0"><p>&#169; The Authors, published by EDP Sciences. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).EPJ Web of Conferences 210, 03005 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921003005 UHECR 2018</p></note>
			<note xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" place="foot" xml:id="foot_1"><p>EPJ Web of Conferences 210, 03005 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/201921003005 UHECR 2018</p></note>
		</body>
		</text>
</TEI>
