skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: Staying the Course: On the Value of Social Studies of Science in Resistance to the “Post-Truth” Movement
Scientific knowledge has been under attack recently, especially during and from the Trump administration. This article discusses the value of research in social studies of science in relation to scientific practice and post‐truth attacks on science. This literature analyzes the expert work and social values that enter into the production of evidence, the development and testing of methods, and the construction of theoretical and epistemological frames for connecting evidence, methods, and methodologies. Although researchers in this area argue that there are politics in science, this article demonstrates that their analyses of the processes of adjudicating evidence and epistemologies contribute to science. In contrast, post‐truth attacks on scientific expertise exemplify a particular kind of politics aimed at supporting a particular group's political and economic interests.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1755003
PAR ID:
10121391
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Sociological forum
ISSN:
0160-3469
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Retracted COVID-19 articles have circulated widely on social media. Although retractions are intended to correct the scientific record, when trust in science is low, they may instead be interpreted as evidence of censorship or simply ignored. We performed a content analysis of tweets about the two most widely shared retracted COVID-19 articles, Mehra20 and Rose21, before and after their retractions. When Mehra20 was seen as a politicized attack on Donald Trump and hydroxychloroquine, its retraction was broadly shared as proof that the article had been published for political reasons. However, when Rose21 was seen as evidence of vaccine harm by vaccine opponents, its retraction was either ignored or else framed as a conspiracy to censor the truth. These results demonstrate how retractions can be selectively used by scientific counterpublics to reframe the regulation of science as evidence of its institutional corruption. 
    more » « less
  2. Energy is a resurgent topic in geography and cognate fields, but its theoretical development and empirical exploration have been uneven. I argue that centering transmission as an analytical lens — rather than treating it as incidental to extraction, generation, and consumption — brings the multi-scalar spatial politics of energy systems into the foreground through attention to circulation. This article reviews work on transmission from energy geographies, science and technology studies, and the histories of energy, technology, and the environment, identifying four main themes. First, transmission is used as a lens to examine larger energy metabolisms and how the circulation of electricity entrenches spatial relations. Second, transmission is an instrument of state territorialization, both within and across borders. Third, transmission, as a particular form of electricity capital, is subject to specific regimes of accumulation and regulation. Finally, transmission lines can become objects of social contestation that entangle multi-scalar politics of energy transition, electrification, and development. The article concludes by identifying areas for further research — empirical, theoretical, and policy-oriented — through which scholarly attention to transmission can inform energy geographies, energy studies, and human-environment geography more broadly. 
    more » « less
  3. ABSTRACT Scientific misinformation is a defining challenge of our time. As public trust in science declines and falsehoods spread faster than facts, the scientific community must rethink its role in public discourse. This Perspective draws on a scenario-based workshop entitled ‘Truth Matters: Strengthening Science Communication to Counter Misinformation’, conducted at the 20th International Congress of Developmental Biology in San Juan, Puerto Rico (June 2025), designed to train scientists in emotionally attuned, culturally responsive and effective communication strategies. At the joint conference with the International Society of Developmental Biology, the Society for Developmental Biology and the Latin American Society for Developmental Biology, we explored why misinformation persists, how identity and social belonging shape belief, and why empathy, not just evidence, is essential to making truth resonate. Here, we offer a call to action along with practical tools: to make scientific knowledge meaningful, we must communicate effectively and ensure it resonates with the broader public. 
    more » « less
  4. Pandey, Sumali (Ed.)
    This original research article focuses on the investigation of the use of generative artificial intelligence (GAI) use among students in communication-intensive STEM courses and how this engagement shapes their scientific communication practices, competencies, confidence, and science identity. Using a mixed-methods approach, patterns were identified in how students perceived their current science identity and use of incorporating artificial intelligence (AI) into writing, oral, and technical tasks. Thematic analysis reveals that students use AI for a range of STEM communication endeavors such as structuring lab reports, brainstorming presentation ideas, and verifying code. While many minoritized students explicitly describe AI as a confidence-boosting, timesaving, and competence-enhancing tool, others—particularly those from privileged backgrounds—downplay its influence, despite evidence of its significant role in their science identity. These results suggest the reframing of science identity as being shaped by technological usage and social contingency. This research illuminates both the potential and pitfalls of AI-use in shaping the next generation of scientists. 
    more » « less
  5. Increasingly, political tensions are seeping into everyday topics. This imposition of politics can change the flow of and dynamics within conversation. In this mixed-methods study, we address the act of politicizing science on YouTube. Using comment data from educational science videos, we identify the moment of explicit politicization and how this changes the subsequent conversation. Results show that politicization becomes more likely as the thread goes on and once a thread has been politicized, it remains that way. Furthermore, after politicization the toxicity of the subsequent comments increases, “tipping” the conversation about science toward personal accusations and attacks about political identity and partisanship. Qualitative insights reveal common “pathways” to politicization, which can be used to design mitigation strategies. 
    more » « less