<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Resource addition drives taxonomic divergence and phylogenetic convergence of plant communities</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>05/07/2019</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10126488</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1111/1365-2745.13253</idno>
					<title level='j'>Journal of Ecology</title>
<idno>0022-0477</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">107</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">5</biblScope>					

					<author>Xian Yang</author><author>Guoyong Li</author><author>Shaopeng Li</author><author>Qianna Xu</author><author>Pandeng Wang</author><author>Huanhuan Song</author><author>Danyu Sun</author><author>Mingxing Zhong</author><author>Zhenxing Zhou</author><author>Jian Song</author><author>Jingyi Ru</author><author>Shiqiang Wan</author><author>Lin Jiang</author><author>David Gibson</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[1. Anthropogenic environmental changes are known to affect the Earth's ecosystems. However, how these changes influence assembly trajectories of the impacted communities remains a largely open question.2. In this study, we investigated the effect of elevated nitrogen (N) deposition and increased precipitation on plant taxonomic and phylogenetic β-diversity in a 9-year field experiment in the temperate semi-arid steppe of Inner Mongolia, China.3. We found that both N and water addition significantly increased taxonomic β-diversity, whereas N, not water, addition significantly increased phylogenetic β-diversity. After the differences in local species diversity were controlled using null models, the standard effect size of taxonomic β-diversity still increased with both N and water addition, whereas water, not N, addition, significantly reduced the standard effect size of phylogenetic β-diversity. The increased phylogenetic convergence observed in the water addition treatment was associated with colonizing species in each water addition plot being more closely related to species in other replicate plots of the same treatment. Species colonization in this treatment was found to be trait-based, with leaf nitrogen concentration being the key functional trait.
Synthesis.Our analyses demonstrate that anthropogenic environmental changes may affect the assembly trajectories of plant communities at both taxonomic and phylogenetic scales. Our results also suggest that while stochastic processes may cause communities to diverge in species composition, deterministic process could still drive communities to converge in phylogenetic community structure.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1">| INTRODUC TI ON</head><p>Understanding mechanisms driving compositional variation across ecological communities, frequently referred to as &#946;-diversity, is one of the major goals of community ecology <ref type="bibr">(Anderson et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chase &amp; Myers, 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Whittaker, 1960)</ref>. Across large spatial scales, evolutionary and biogeographic processes such as in situ diversification may constitute an important source of &#946;-diversity <ref type="bibr">(Graham &amp; Fine, 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ricklefs, 2006</ref><ref type="bibr">Ricklefs, , 2008))</ref>. Ecological theories that explain &#946;-diversity among communities, which generally ignore evolutionary processes, fall into two broad categories. The niche theory suggests that &#946;-diversity arises largely from deterministic processes, driven by ecological selection favouring different species across localities characterized by different environmental conditions <ref type="bibr">(Chase &amp; Leibold, 2003)</ref>. In contrast, the neutral theory suggests that &#946;-diversity could simply arise from ecological drift, driven by stochastic processes such as chance colonization and random demographic events <ref type="bibr">(Bell, 2001;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hubbell, 2001)</ref>. Ecological communities are known to be subject to the influence of both niche-based ecological selection, which would cause communities sharing similar environmental conditions to be structurally similar (i.e. low &#946;-diversity), and stochasticity-based ecological drift, which could cause substantial structural dissimilarity among communities (i.e. high &#946;-diversity) even in similar environments <ref type="bibr">(Adler, HilleRisLambers, &amp; Levine, 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gravel, Canham, Beaudet, &amp; Messier, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Leibold &amp; McPeek, 2006)</ref>. As anthropogenic environmental changes, such as increased nitrogen (N) deposition and changing precipitation, continue to affect ecosystems world-wide <ref type="bibr">(Vitousek, Mooney, Lubchenco, &amp; Melillo, 1997)</ref>, it is essential to understand how these changes affect the relative importance of the two contrasting processes in shaping community assembly, and, consequently, &#946;-diversity among the assembled communities.</p><p>Anthropogenic environmental changes in the form of resource amendment (e.g. increased N deposition and elevated precipitation) may have the potential to impact the trajectory of community assembly, and thus &#946;-diversity in opposite directions. For example in environments where limited resource supply presents an important environmental filter that excludes many species whose resource requirements are not met, increased resource input may relieve environmental harshness and allow a greater number of species to successfully colonize the habitat; the resulting larger species pool could then more readily give rise to alternative community states <ref type="bibr">(Chase, 2003;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fukami, 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Jiang, Joshi, Flakes, &amp; Jung, 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Law &amp; Morton, 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Levine, Bascompte, Adler, &amp; Allesina, 2017;</ref><ref type="bibr">Saavedra et al., 2017)</ref>, resulting in increased &#946;-diversity. The increased environmental productivity under resource enrichment may further promote the presence of alternative community states <ref type="bibr">(Chase, 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Ejrnaes, Bruun, &amp; Graae, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Isbell, Tilman, Polasky, Binder, &amp; Hawthorne, 2013)</ref>. On the other hand, increased resource input may favour species with certain traits but make the condition less favourable for other species (e.g. <ref type="bibr">Dickson, Mittelbach, Reynolds, &amp; Gross, 2014)</ref>, which would lead to increased dominance of the same species assemblages across communities, resulting in reduced &#946;-diversity. In addition, resource enrichment may often cause the reduced availability of other resources and increased intensity of competition for these resources (e.g. light for plants, <ref type="bibr">Hautier, Niklaus, &amp; Hector, 2009)</ref>, accelerating deterministic competitive exclusion.</p><p>Notably, existing studies on the response of &#946;-diversity to environmental changes have focused on taxonomic &#946;-diversity that captures turnover in species composition among sites <ref type="bibr">(Chase, 2007</ref><ref type="bibr">(Chase, , 2010;;</ref><ref type="bibr">Myers, Chase, Crandall, &amp; Jim&#233;nez, 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Zhang, Liu, Bai, Zhang, &amp; Han, 2011)</ref>. It is less clear how phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, which accounts for evolutionary relationships among species, responds to environmental changes [but see <ref type="bibr">Guo et al. (2018)</ref> for a study of climate warming on soil microbial communities]. Studying phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, however, could provide novel insight into how communities respond to environmental changes beyond those obtained via studying taxonomic &#946;-diversity alone <ref type="bibr">(Gerhold, Cahill, Winter, Bartish, &amp; Prinzing, 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Graham &amp; Fine, 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hardy, Couteron, Munoz, Ramesh, &amp; P&#233;lissier, 2012)</ref>. For instance the study of both taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity could allow the exploration of the idea that the degree of determinism in community assembly may depend on the level of ecological organization examined <ref type="bibr">(Diamond, 1975;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fox, 1987;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fukami, Bezemer, Mortimer, &amp; Putten, 2005)</ref>. A group of phylogenetically closely related species may exhibit largely similar responses to environmental changes, by virtue of their similar traits, making the group-level response more deterministic. However, changes in individual species within the group may be less deterministic, as the result of ecological drift influencing populations of closely related species. We thus hypothesize that taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity may not necessarily show similar responses to environmental changes.</p><p>Changes in species taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity may be better understood by looking into species extinction and colonization patterns. Species loss may depend on their traits and evolutionary history, such that species of certain clades may suffer greater extinction risk than species of other clades <ref type="bibr">(Purvis, Agapow, Gittleman, &amp; Mace, 2000)</ref>. For example legumes, which can well tolerate low soil N concentrations, may experience elevated extinction under elevated N levels <ref type="bibr">(Stevens, Bunker, Schnitzer, &amp; Carson, 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xia &amp; Wan, 2008)</ref>. The deterministic loss of these clades across communities, in response to environmental changes, would promote community convergence, resulting in reduced taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (Figure <ref type="figure">1a</ref>). Phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, however, may not necessarily decline as rapidly as taxonomic &#946;-diversity if only some, not all species belonging to the same clades face extinction. Extinction, however, is far from deterministic <ref type="bibr">(Lande, 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lande, Engen, &amp; Saether, 2003)</ref>. The random loss of species, especially those with small population sizes <ref type="bibr">(Matthies, Br&#228;uer, Maibom, &amp; Tscharntke, 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Suding et al., 2005)</ref>, in different locations may drive divergence of species composition among communities, resulting in increased taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (Figure <ref type="figure">1b</ref>,<ref type="figure">c</ref>).</p><p>Likewise, colonization could be either stochastic or deterministic, causing corresponding changes in taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (Figure <ref type="figure">1d</ref>,f,g). Colonization-induced changes in phylogenetic &#946;-diversity also may not necessarily parallel those in taxonomic &#946;-diversity. For example the colonization of a group of species in which members are closely related would drive the communities towards phylogenetic convergence, but may not necessarily cause taxonomic convergence if other factors, such as dispersal limitation, prevent the same species from colonizing all localities. Under this circumstance, we would expect increased taxonomic &#946;-diversity but decreased phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (Figure <ref type="figure">1e</ref>).</p><p>Here, we report on a field experiment, conducted in a temperate steppe in northern China, to investigate the effects of N and precipitation amendment on taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity of plant communities. The temperate steppe in this area is currently experiencing significant anthropogenic environmental changes, including increased N deposition and precipitation <ref type="bibr">(Chen et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Niu et al., 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Xia, Niu, &amp; Wan, 2009)</ref>, necessitating a thorough understanding of their ecological consequences. Previous work at the study site has documented changes in a number of community and ecosystem properties, including functional group composition <ref type="bibr">(Yang et al., 2011)</ref>, ecosystem productivity, respiration and net C exchange <ref type="bibr">(Niu et al., 2009</ref><ref type="bibr">(Niu et al., , 2010))</ref>, community stability <ref type="bibr">(Yang et al., 2012)</ref> and plant phylogenetic community structure <ref type="bibr">(Yang et al., 2018)</ref>, in response to experimental manipulations of N and precipitation.</p><p>However, the question of how these environmental changes affect the trajectory of community assembly remains unanswered. We showed that both N and water addition increased the standard effective size of taxonomic &#946;-diversity, whereas water, not N, addition, reduced the standard effective size of phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, suggesting that anthropogenic environmental changes differentially affected plant community assembly trajectories at taxonomic and phylogenetic scales.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2">| MATERIAL S AND ME THODS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1">| Study site, experimental design and vegetation sampling</head><p>The experiment was conducted in a natural grassland at the Duolun</p><p>Restoration Ecology Station of the Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, located in a temperate steppe (42 o 02' N, 116 o 17' E) in Inner Mongolia, China. The study area has a semi-arid continental monsoon climate with annual precipitation of 378 mm and mean annual temperature of 2.1&#176;C. Dominant plant species (in terms of cover) in this area are perennial grasses and forbs, including</p><p>of the potential effects of species colonization and extinction on community taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity. Plot A and B are two replicate plots under the same experimental treatments. For illustration purpose, here we only relate colonization/extinction in plot B (focal plot) to communities in plot A (reference plot). The overall effects of species colonization and extinction on community taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity could be assessed by averaging all possible pairwise combinations of replicate plots that are subject to the same treatments. Phylogenetic dissimilarity colonization/extinctinction is the standardized effect size of phylogenetic &#946;-diversity between colonized/extinct species in plot B and final community composition of plot A. (a) Extinction eliminates species in plot B that are distantly related to final species composition in plot A, leading to decreased taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (b) Random extinction of species in plot B leads to increased taxonomic beta diversity and increased or unchanged phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (c) Extinction eliminates species in plot B that are closely related to final species composition in plot A, leading to increased taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (d) Colonization of species into plot B leads to similar final species composition in the two plots, leading to decreased taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (e) Colonization of species into plot B that are not present in plot A but closely related to final species composition in plot A leads to increased taxonomic but decreased phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (f) Random colonization of species into plot B leads to increased taxonomic beta diversity and increased or unchanged phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots. (g) Colonization of species that are distantly related to final species composition in plot A into plot B leads to increased taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity between the two plots More detailed information on the study area and experimental design can be found in <ref type="bibr">Yang et al. (2012)</ref>.</p><p>We surveyed the experimental plots in August each year from 2005 to 2013. In each plot, we placed a 1 &#215; 1 m frame with 100 10 &#215; 10 cm grids into a randomly selected 1 &#215; 1 m quadrat. All species in each grid were identified and their coverage were estimated based on their occurrence within the 100 grids. We also collected data on key plant functional traits, including plant height, rooting depth, leaf N concentration and specific leaf area (SLA). Unlike our previous work <ref type="bibr">(Yang et al., 2018)</ref>, which extracted most trait data from the TRY database <ref type="bibr">(Kattge et al., 2011)</ref>, here we measured most data in situ. Plant height was measured as the maximum height of each species in the experimental plots at the beginning of the experiment. Plant samples for the measurement of other traits were collected from a nearby grassland outside the experimental plots.</p><p>Rooting depth, leaf N concentration and SLA of 26 common species were measured according to <ref type="bibr">Cornelissen et al. (2003)</ref>. For species for which trait data were not directly measured, we extracted data on rooting depth, leaf N concentration and SLA from the TRY database (Supporting Information Figure <ref type="figure">S1</ref>; <ref type="bibr">Kattge et al., 2011)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2">| Phylogenetic tree</head><p>We constructed a phylogenetic tree for the 52 species observed in the experimental area (Supporting Information Figure <ref type="figure">S1</ref>). First, we built a genus-level phylogenetic tree based on the phylogeny of vascular plants generated by <ref type="bibr">Zanne et al. (2014)</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Qian and Jin (2016)</ref>.</p><p>However, species in the genera Allium, Astragalus and Potentilla were absent from Zanne et al. and Q ian &amp; Jin's phylogeny. We thus extracted the ITS1 and ITS2 sequences of species belonging to these genera from GenBank and constructed a phylogenetic tree for each genus.</p><p>We aligned the sequences from GenBank with Clustal X (version 2.0; <ref type="bibr">Larkin et al., 2007)</ref>, confirmed the alignment by observation, and selected the best evolution model with jModelTest (version 2.1.10; <ref type="bibr">Guindon &amp; Gascuel, 2003;</ref><ref type="bibr">Darriba, Taboada, Doallo, &amp; Posada, 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr"/> 012,340 + G+F for Allium and Potentilla; 011,012 + F for Astragalus).</p><p>The phylogeny of each genus was constructed with the Bayesian method in MrBayes (version 3.1.2; <ref type="bibr">Huelsenbeck &amp; Ronquist, 2001)</ref>, using the closest relative to each genus as the outgroup.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.3">| Species and phylogenetic &#946;diversities and their standardized effect sizes</head><p>To assess treatment effects on community convergence/divergence, we calculated dissimilarities in species composition (i.e. taxonomic &#946;-diversity) and phylogenetic structure (i.e. phylogenetic &#946;-diversity) between replicated plots within the same treatment. Taxonomic &#946;diversity was calculated using the abundance-weighted Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index <ref type="bibr">(Bray &amp; Curtis, 1957)</ref>. The Bray-Curtis index is robust to sampling errors <ref type="bibr">(Schroeder &amp; Jenkins, 2018)</ref>, and is widely used to quantify taxonomic &#946;-diversity among communities. The value of Bray-Curtis dissimilarity approaches 0 when species composition is identical, and approaches 1 when species composition is completely different. Phylogenetic &#946;-diversity was quantified using the abundance-weighted pairwise dissimilarity index D pw <ref type="bibr">(Swenson, 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Webb, Ackerly, &amp; Kembel, 2008)</ref>. D pw is suitable for detecting phylogenetically basal turnover between communities and converges to the Bray-Curtis dissimilarity index in the case of a star phylogeny <ref type="bibr">(Swenson, 2011)</ref>. It is calculated as:</p><p>where k 1 and k 2 are two communities, f i is the relative cover of species i in community k 1 , f j is the relative cover of species j in community k 2 , ik 2 is the mean pairwise phylogenetic distance between species i in community k 1 and all species in community k 2 excluding conspecific species and jk 1 is the mean pairwise phylogenetic distance between species j in community k 2 and all species in community k 1 excluding conspecific species. Larger values of D pw indicate greater phylogenetic distance between the compared communities.</p><p>In addition to niche-based and stochasticity-based ecological processes, the observed patterns of taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity may also be affected by both local community diversity (&#945;-diversity) and the size of the regional species pool (&#947;-diversity).</p><p>In particular, when the regional species pool remains unchanged, any factor that changes &#945;-diversity could potentially alter &#946;-diversity owing simply to random sampling effects <ref type="bibr">(Anderson et al., 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chase, Kraft, Smith, Vellend, &amp; Inouye, 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chase &amp; Myers, 2011;</ref><ref type="bibr">Myers et al., 2013)</ref>. Therefore, we performed null model analyses to disentangle the variation in &#946;-diversity from variation in &#945;-diversity. The null model analyses determined if the observed patterns in taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity deviated from the expectations of random assembly, after accounting for changes in &#945;-diversity. A null distribution of taxonomic &#946;-diversity was generated by randomly sampling individuals from the (1) D pw = &#8721;nk 1 i=1 f i ik 2 + &#8721;nk 2 j=1 f j jk 1 2 regional species pool 999 times, while persevering the total plant cover in each plot and the relative cover of each species in the species pool <ref type="bibr">(Kraft et al., 2011)</ref>. Null distributions of phylogenetic &#946;-diversity were generated by randomizing the names of species across the tips of the phylogenetic tree 999 times <ref type="bibr">(Webb et al., 2008)</ref>. Standardized effect size (SES; <ref type="bibr">Gotelli &amp; Graves, 1996)</ref> was calculated for taxonomic (&#946;-deviation) and phylogenetic (SES.D pw ) &#946;-diversity using the mean and standard deviation of their respective null distributions:</p><p>where X observed is the observed &#946;-diversity value between two communities, X null is the mean value of the null distribution and sd (X null ) is the standard deviation of the null distribution. Positive and negative values indicate higher and lower &#946;-diversity than expected by chance, respectively, whereas a value of zero indicates that the observed &#946;-diversity does not differ from random patterns.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.4">| Species colonization and extinction</head><p>We classified a species to be locally extinct from a plot if they were and 2013 only may be vulnerable to observation error, we also divided the experiment into three periods <ref type="bibr">(2005-2007, 2007-2010 and 2010-2013)</ref>, and analysed &#946;-deviation(C/E) and SES.D pw (C/E) for each period. Consistent results between the three periods would lend greater credibility to our results.</p><p>To assess the contributions of species' functional traits on the pattern of SES.D pw , we calculated SES.D pw values of functional traits for both colonist and extinct species using the dendrograms of the measured functional traits (i.e. plant height, rooting depth, leaf N concentration and SLA). We generated four trait dendrograms, one for each functional trait, using UPGMA clustering based on the Euclidean distance matrix <ref type="bibr">(Petchey &amp; Gaston, 2002)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.5">| Statistical analysis</head><p>To test for the effects of N and water addition on taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity and their standardized effect sizes over time, we conducted a permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA; 999 permutations; <ref type="bibr">Anderson, 2001)</ref> in which fertilization, watering, time and their interactions were used as explanatory variables. Following PERMANOVA, we also used permutational analysis of multivariate dispersions (PERMDISP) to test whether communities differ in their within-treatment dissimilarities <ref type="bibr">(Anderson, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Anderson, Ellingsen, &amp; McArdle, 2006)</ref>.</p><p>We calculated the phylogenetic signal of the four functional traits measured in this study using the K statistic <ref type="bibr">(Blomberg, Garland, &amp; Ives, 2003)</ref>. The significance (p-values) of the phylogenetic signal was evaluated by comparing the variance of independent contrasts for each trait to the expected values obtained by shuffling leaf trait data across the tips of the phylogenetic tree 999 times. To assess the importance of species' initial coverage and functional traits on colonization and extinction, we ran logistic regressions of species colonization/extinction as a function of species' initial coverage and trait values (i.e. plant height, rooting depth, leaf N concentration and SLA). Species that did not colonize or go extinct in any plot within a treatment were assigned a value of 0. Otherwise, species were assigned a value of 1. We assigned values for colonization and extinction separately.</p><p>All analyses were performed using R 3.5.1 (R Core Team., 2018).</p><p>The Bray-Curtis index was calculated using the vegdist function in the package vegan <ref type="bibr">(Oksanen et al., 2018)</ref>, and D pw was calculated using the comdist function in the package picante <ref type="bibr">(Kembel et al., 2010)</ref>. The null communities were generated using the nullmodel in the vegan package <ref type="bibr">(Oksanen et al., 2018)</ref>. PERMANOVA and PERMDISP were performed using the functions adonis2 and betadisper in the vegan package respectively <ref type="bibr">(Oksanen et al., 2018)</ref>. The analyses on phylogenetic signal were conducted using the function multiPhylosignal in the picante package <ref type="bibr">(Kembel et al., 2010)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3">| RE SULTS</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.1">| Species taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;diversity, and their standardized effect size</head><p>Taxonomic &#946;-diversity (Bray-Curtis index) fluctuated significantly over time in all but the water addition treatments. Taxonomic &#946;-diversity exhibited a positive trend only in the N addition treatment, resulting in greater &#946;-diversity in this treatment than the controls (Figure <ref type="figure">2a</ref>). Phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (D pw ) remained largely unchanged in the N addition and N + water addition treatments, but declined over time in the control and water addition plots, resulting in greater phylogenetic &#946;-diversity in the N addition and N + water (2) SES.X = X obsered -X null sd X null addition plots towards the end of the experiment (Figure <ref type="figure">2c</ref>).</p><p>PERMANOVA indicated that N enrichment, water addition, year and all their two-way interaction terms significantly affected taxonomic &#946;-diversity, whereas phylogenetic &#946;-diversity was only significantly affected by N addition (Table <ref type="table">1</ref>). PERMDISP revealed that N, water and N + water addition treatment increased the dispersion of species composition (Supporting Information Figure <ref type="figure">S2</ref>).</p><p>&#946;-deviation showed a similar temporal pattern as the Bray-Curtis index. At the end of the experiment, &#946;-deviation was not significantly different from null expectation in the control plots, but was significantly higher than null expectation in the N, water and N + water addition treatments, with the highest values observed for the N addition plots (Figure <ref type="figure">2b</ref>). The standardized effect size of D pw (i.e. SES.D pw ) was significantly greater than zero in all treatments initially (one-sample t-test, p &lt; .05). At the end of the experiment, however, SES.D pw was significantly negative (one-sample t-test, p = .018) in the water addition plots and not significantly different from zero in the other treatments (one-sample t-test, p &gt; .05; Figure <ref type="figure">2d</ref>).</p><p>Correspondingly, PERMANOVA indicated that N enrichment, water addition and their interaction terms significantly affected &#946;-deviation and that SES.D pw was only affected by water addition (Table <ref type="table">1</ref>).</p><p>PERMDISP revealed that D pw showed greater dispersion in the N, water and N + water addition treatments than the controls, whereas SES. D pw showed lower dispersion in the water addition treatment than other treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">S2</ref>, Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.2">| Species colonization and extinction</head><p>In the control plots, most of the extinct species were forbs from the genera Allium and Potentilla and most colonists were grasses from the family Poaceae. In plots with N fertilization, in addition to species that went extinct in the controls, some grasses from the family Poaceae and Cyperaceae also went extinct; the few colonists were mainly forbs from the families Rosaceae and Cruciferae. In the water addition plots, however, the number of extinct species was much lower, with most being extinct also in the control plots. Species Df Bray-Curtis D pw &#946;-deviation SES.D pw F p F p F p F p N 1 20.45 .001 11.62 .001 1.79 .001 0.87 1.000 Water 1 5.21 .001 1.17 0.181 1.15 .001 1.02 .035 Year 1 12.42 .001 1.55 0.055 1.00 .467 0.98 .924 N:W 1 2.69 .016 1.10 0.212 1.08 .032 0.99 .858 N:Y 1 3.69 .002 1.63 0.047 1.16 .003 1.00 .614 W:Y 1 2.66 .011 1.30 0.113 1.10 .012 1.01 .110 N:W:Y 1 1.02 .382 0.92 0.499 1.00 .500 0.99 .765</p><p>TA B L E 1 Results of permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) on the effects of N enrichment, water addition, year and their interactions on community taxonomic &#946;-diversity (Bray-Curtis), phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (D pw ) and their respective standard effect sizes (&#946;-deviation and SES. D pw ). The analyses were performed using 999 permutations. p &lt; 0.05 shown in bold.</p><p>colonizing the water addition plots were mainly forbs from the families Labiatae, Gentianaceae and Leguminosae (Figure <ref type="figure">S1</ref>).</p><p>The compositional dissimilarity between colonists and final community composition within a treatment (i.e. &#946;-deviation(C)) was significantly greater than zero in all treatments, indicating that colonists were more dissimilar to species in other replicate plots than null expectation (Figure <ref type="figure">3a</ref>; one-sample t-test, p &lt; .05). The compositional dissimilarity between extinct species and the final community composition within a treatment (i.e. &#946;-deviation(E)) was also significantly greater than zero in all treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">3b</ref>; one-sample t-test, p &lt; .05), indicating taxonomically deterministic extinction.</p><p>The phylogenetic SES.D pw between colonists and final community composition within a treatment (i.e. SES.D pw (C)) did not significantly differ from zero in the control, N addition and N + water addition treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">3c</ref>; one-sample t-test, p &gt; .05), indicating phylogenetic randomness of species colonization in these treatments.</p><p>However, we found significant negative phylogenetic SES.D pw (C) in the water addition treatment (Figure <ref type="figure">3c</ref>; one-sample t-test, p = .035),</p><p>indicating that colonizing species in each water addition plot were more closely related to species in other replicate plots than expected by chance. The phylogenetic SES.D pw between extinct species and final community composition within a treatment (SES.D pw (E)) was not significantly different from zero in the N, water and N + water addition treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">3d</ref>; one-sample t-test, p &gt; .05), indicating phylogenetic randomness of species extinction in these treatments.</p><p>The average phylogenetic SES.D pw (E) in the controls was significantly greater than zero (Figure <ref type="figure">3d</ref>; one-sample t-test, p = .011),</p><p>indicating that extinction excluded species that were more phylogenetically distantly related to the final species composition than expected by chance in this treatment. When the experiment was divided into three periods <ref type="bibr">(2005-2007, 2007-2010 and 2010-2013)</ref>, the patterns for &#946;-deviation(C/E) and SES.D pw (C/E) within each period were similar to those across all years (Figure <ref type="figure">S3</ref>).</p><p>Among the four functional traits measured in this study, significant phylogenetic signal was detected only for leaf N concentration (p = .035, Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>). Therefore, we presented the results on leaf N concentration in the main text and the results on other functional traits in the supporting information (Supporting Information Figure <ref type="figure">S4</ref>, S5, Appendix A, B). The SES.D pw (C) for leaf N concentration showed a similar pattern with phylogenetic SES.D pw (C), such that colonizing species in each water addition plot were more similar in leaf N concentration with species in other replicate plots than expected by chance (Figure <ref type="figure">4a</ref>, one-sample t-test, p = .036). For species extinction, non-significant SES.D pw (E) for leaf N concentration was found for all treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">4b</ref>).</p><p>The initial coverage of species was a significant predictor of species extinction in all treatments. Species with lower initial coverage tended to have a greater probability of extinction (Figure <ref type="figure">5a-d</ref>), corresponding with the taxonomically deterministic extinction found in all treatments (shown in Figure <ref type="figure">3b</ref>). Leaf N concentration affected the likelihood of species colonization in the water addition treatment, such that species with higher leaf N concentrations were more likely to colonize (Figure <ref type="figure">5g</ref>). In the N + water addition treatment, leaf N concentration affected the likelihood of species extinction, such that species with higher N concentration suffered from greater risk of extinction (Figure <ref type="figure">5h</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4">| D ISCUSS I ON</head><p>The Earth's ecosystems are facing widespread anthropogenic environmental changes. A key challenge is to elucidate how ecological processes interact with evolutionary processes in influencing diversity patterns across spatial scales in the face of anthropogenic environmental changes. In this study, we investigated the impact of elevated N deposition and precipitation on species taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, and linked species colonization and extinction to the observed &#946;-diversity patterns. We found that both N enrichment and water addition significantly increased taxonomic &#946;diversity, and N enrichment also significantly increased phylogenetic &#946;-diversity. However, when the differences in local community size were controlled for using null models, both N enrichment and water addition significantly increased the standard effect size of taxonomic F I G U R E 5 Species colonization (black circles) and local extinction (red circles) as functions of initial coverage (a-d) and leaf N concentration (e-h) in each treatment. Species that did not colonize or go extinct in any plot within a treatment was assigned a value of 0. Otherwise, species were assigned a value of 1. Significant logistic regression lines (p &lt; .1) are shown</p><p>synthesized data from 18 N-enrichment experiments along a productivity gradient across North America, and found that N addition promoted &#946;-diversity at low-productivity sites but reduced &#946;-diversity at high-productivity sites, with the threshold productivity around 400 g m -2 year -1 . The positive treatment effects on &#946;-diversity in our experiment are in accordance with this general pattern, as the productivity at our study site is far below the threshold (60 ~ 250 g m -2 year -1 , <ref type="bibr">Xu et al., 2018)</ref>. N and water are known to be the two major limiting resources for our study grassland <ref type="bibr">(Bai, Han, Wu, Chen, &amp; Li, 2004;</ref><ref type="bibr">Niu et al., 2010)</ref>. Our results are thus consistent with the idea that adding limiting resources enhances &#946;-diversity in resource-scarce environments, where strong environmental filtering limits community membership in a largely deterministic manner <ref type="bibr">(Chalcraft et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chase, 2010)</ref>. Note that in our experiment, both taxonomic &#946;-diversity and &#946;-deviation increased in response to N and water addition, indicating that the observed community divergence after N and water addition was due to the enhanced role of stochastic processes rather than changes in &#945;-diversity. One possible mechanism for the more important role of stochastic assembly processes under resource enrichment is that stronger priority effects may lead to the increased likelihood of multiple community states in more benign environments <ref type="bibr">(Chase, 2003</ref><ref type="bibr">(Chase, , 2007</ref><ref type="bibr">(Chase, , 2010))</ref>. In our study, dispersal was highly stochastic at the species level, as evidenced by the compositional dissimilarity between colonized species in each plot and species in other replicate plots (i.e. &#946;-deviation (C)) being much higher than null expectation in all treatments. Under resource amendment, such stochastic dispersal may have led to high variability in species arrival history and, in turn, strong priority effects, promoting the taxonomic divergence of communities <ref type="bibr">(Chase, 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Vannette &amp; Fukami, 2017)</ref>.</p><p>We found that water addition, rather than N enrichment, significantly decreased the standard effect size of phylogenetic &#946;-diversity (SES.D pw ), driving the communities from being phylogenetically divergent to being phylogenetically convergent (Figure <ref type="figure">2d</ref>). Such transition in the water addition treatment could be attributed to the phylogenetically non-random colonization of species. Specifically, the colonists in each plot after water addition were significantly related to species in other replicate plots (Figure <ref type="figure">3c</ref>), resulting in phylogenetically similar community composition among plots. This pattern contrasts with the taxonomically stochastic colonization and divergence observed in the water addition plots (see the previous paragraph), supporting our hypothesis that taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity may not necessarily respond similarly to environmental changes <ref type="bibr">(Graham &amp; Fine, 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hardy et al., 2012)</ref>. These results emerged likely because water addition favours certain closely related species with similar traits (e.g. those with similar leaf N content, Figure <ref type="figure">4a</ref>), resulting in community convergence at the phylogenetic scale, but facilitates the non-deterministic colonization of these species among plots (Figure <ref type="figure">3a</ref>), resulting in community divergence at the species level. One to confirm this explanation is to eliminate the stochasticity associated with species colonization by, for example seed addition, which would favour community convergence at both taxonomic and phylogenetic scales. Indeed, a recent study has found that fertilization and water addition into a California grassland reduced plant taxonomic &#946;-diversity when seeds of common species were added to all experimental plots <ref type="bibr">(Eskelinen &amp; Harrison, 2015)</ref>.</p><p>On the other hand, our results clearly show that considering both phylogenetic and taxonomic turnover allows a better assessment of the role of deterministic and stochastic processes in shaping ecological communities.</p><p>We found evidence for functional trait-based species colonization in the water addition plots. Leaf N concentration, the only plant trait that exhibited significant phylogenetic signal (Table <ref type="table">S2</ref>), was found to be more similar between the colonist in each plot and the species in other replicate plots in the water addition, but not other treatments (Figure <ref type="figure">4a</ref>). Correspondingly, the probability of colonization was strongly associated with leaf N concentration, with N-rich species tending to have a greater probability of colonization (Figure <ref type="figure">5g</ref>). Leaf N concentration is a key functional trait on the "leaf economic spectrum" that relates to plant resource capture and conservation <ref type="bibr">(Wright et al., 2004)</ref>. N-poor species are generally conservative in resource use and expected to be better at coping with abiotic stress <ref type="bibr">(Coley, Bryant, &amp; Chapin, 1985;</ref><ref type="bibr">D&#237;az et al., 2016;</ref><ref type="bibr">Reich, Walters, &amp; Ellsworth, 1997;</ref><ref type="bibr">Wright et al., 2004)</ref>. Studies that explored relationships between leaf economic traits and climate have found a general tendency for species inhabiting arid and semi-arid regions to exhibit a more conservative strategy in resource use <ref type="bibr">(Wright, Reich, &amp; Westoby, 2001)</ref>. In line with these findings, our result demonstrated that enhanced water supply alleviated abiotic stress and facilitated species on the "acquisitive" end of the leaf economic spectrum to colonize, which resulted in phylogenetic homogenization among water addition plots. Finally, we note that traits of the same plant species may respond to resource amendment, such that they may also differ among experimental treatments <ref type="bibr">(Yan et al., 2015)</ref>. This possibility, however, would need to be addressed by future studies, as we only quantified plant traits in the controls.</p><p>Our study provides, to our knowledge, the first experimental evidence that anthropogenic environmental changes can differentially affect plant taxonomic and phylogenetic &#946;-diversity.</p><p>Both N enrichment and water addition significantly increased taxonomic &#946;-diversity, whereas water addition, not N enrichment, significantly reduced phylogenetic &#946;-diversity, with the latter attributed to colonizing species in each water addition plot being more closely related to species in other replicate plots of the same treatment. Our results thus illustrate that although stochastic processes may cause communities to diverge more in species composition under anthropogenic environmental changes, deterministic processes could still produce communities more convergent in phylogenetic community structure. It remains to be seen whether these findings apply to other systems and whether they extend to ecosystem functions. For example an interesting question to ask next is whether community phylogenetic convergence under precipitation amendment would translate into ecosystem functional convergence.</p></div></body>
		</text>
</TEI>
