Dry deposition of ozone is an important sink of ozone in near‐surface air. When dry deposition occurs through plant stomata, ozone can injure the plant, altering water and carbon cycling and reducing crop yields. Quantifying both stomatal and nonstomatal uptake accurately is relevant for understanding ozone's impact on human health as an air pollutant and on climate as a potent short‐lived greenhouse gas and primary control on the removal of several reactive greenhouse gases and air pollutants. Robust ozone dry deposition estimates require knowledge of the relative importance of individual deposition pathways, but spatiotemporal variability in nonstomatal deposition is poorly understood. Here we integrate understanding of ozone deposition processes by synthesizing research from fields such as atmospheric chemistry, ecology, and meteorology. We critically review methods for measurements and modeling, highlighting the empiricism that underpins modeling and thus the interpretation of observations. Our unprecedented synthesis of knowledge on deposition pathways, particularly soil and leaf cuticles, reveals process understanding not yet included in widely used models. If coordinated with short‐term field intensives, laboratory studies, and mechanistic modeling, measurements from a few long‐term sites would bridge the molecular to ecosystem scales necessary to establish the relative importance of individual deposition pathways and the extent to which they vary in space and time. Our recommended approaches seek to close knowledge gaps that currently limit quantifying the impact of ozone dry deposition on air quality, ecosystems, and climate.
Spatiotemporal variability in ozone dry deposition is often overlooked despite its implications for interpreting and modeling tropospheric ozone concentrations accurately. Understanding the influences of stomatal versus nonstomatal deposition processes on ozone deposition velocity is important for attributing observed changes in the ozone depositional sink and associated damage to ecosystems. Here, we aim to identify the stomatal versus nonstomatal deposition processes driving observed variability in ozone deposition velocity over the northeastern United States during June–September. We use ozone eddy covariance measurements from Harvard Forest in Massachusetts, which span a decade, and from Kane Experimental Forest in Pennsylvania and Sand Flats State Forest in New York, which span one growing season each, along with observation‐driven modeling. Using a cumulative precipitation indicator of soil wetness, we infer that high soil uptake during dry years and low soil uptake during wet years may contribute to the twofold interannual variability in ozone deposition velocity at Harvard Forest. We link stomatal deposition and humidity to variability in ozone deposition velocity on daily timescales. The humidity dependence may reflect higher uptake by leaf cuticles under humid conditions, noted in previous work. Previous work also suggests that uptake by leaf cuticles may be enhanced after rain, but we find that increases in ozone deposition velocity on rainy days are instead mostly associated with increases in stomatal conductance. Our analysis highlights a need for constraints on subseasonal variability in ozone dry deposition to soil and fast in‐canopy chemistry during ecosystem stress.
more » « less- Award ID(s):
- 1832210
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10457116
- Publisher / Repository:
- DOI PREFIX: 10.1029
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Volume:
- 124
- Issue:
- 10
- ISSN:
- 2169-897X
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- p. 5612-5628
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
more » « less
Abstract -
more » « less
Abstract Dry deposition is an important sink of tropospheric ozone and influences background and episodic ozone air pollution. Plant canopies remove ozone through uptake by plant stomata, leaf cuticles, and soil. Stomatal uptake of ozone injures vegetation, thereby altering local‐to‐global water and carbon cycling. Observed ozone fluxes are used to inform dry deposition parameterizations in chemical transport models but represent the net influence of several poorly constrained processes. Advancing understanding of the processes controlling dry deposition is key for building predictive ability of the terrestrial ozone sink and plant damage. Here, we constrain the influence of spatial structure in turbulence on ozone dry deposition with large eddy simulation coupled to a multilayer canopy model. We investigate whether organized turbulence separates areas of efficient leaf uptake from areas of high or low ozone mixing ratios. We simulate summertime midday conditions at three homogenous deciduous forests with varying leaf area, soil moisture, and ambient humidity. Sensitivity simulations perturb atmospheric stability, parameters related to ozone dry deposition, how quickly stomata respond to local atmospheric variations, and entrainment of ozone from atmospheric boundary layer growth. Overall, we find a low covariance between ozone and leaf uptake, in part due to counteracting influences from micrometeorological variations on ozone and leaf uptake individually versus the influence of leaf uptake on ozone. The low covariance between ozone and leaf uptake suggests that dry deposition parameterizations and interpretations of ozone flux observations can ignore the influence of organized turbulence on dry deposition.
-
more » « less
Abstract Dry deposition, the second largest removal process of ozone (O3) in the troposphere, plays a role in controlling the natural variability of surface O3concentrations. Terrestrial ecosystems remove O3either through stomatal uptake or nonstomatal processes. In chemical transport models, nonstomatal pathways are roughly constrained and may not correctly capture total O3loss. To address this, the first simultaneous eddy covariance measurements of O3and formic acid (HCOOH), a tracer of in‐canopy oxidation of biogenic terpenes, were made in a mixed temperate forest in Northern Wisconsin. Daytime maximum O3deposition velocities,
v d (O3), ranged between 0.5 and 1.2 cm s−1. Comparison of observedv d (O3) with observationally constrained estimates of stomatal uptake and parameterized estimates of cuticular and soil uptake reveal a large (10%–90%) residual nonstomatal contribution tov d (O3). The residual downward flux of O3was well correlated with measurements of HCOOH upward flux, suggesting unaccounted for in‐canopy gas‐phase chemistry. -
more » « less
Abstract Dry deposition could partially explain the observed response in ambient ozone to extreme hot and dry episodes. We examine the response of ozone deposition to heat and dry anomalies using three long‐term co‐located ecosystem‐scale carbon dioxide, water vapor and ozone flux measurement records. We find that, as expected, canopy stomatal conductance generally decreases during days with dry air or soil. However, during hot days, concurrent increases in non‐stomatal conductance are inferred at all three sites, which may be related to several temperature‐sensitive processes not represented in the current generation of big‐leaf models. This may offset the reduction in stomatal conductance, leading to smaller net reduction, or even net increase, in total deposition velocity. We find the response of deposition velocity to soil dryness may be related to its impact on photosynthetic activity, though considerable variability exists. Our findings emphasize the need for better understanding and representation of non‐stomatal ozone deposition.
-
null (Ed.)Abstract. During the Program for Research on Oxidants: PHotochemistry, Emissions, and Transport (PROPHET) campaign from 21 July to 3 August 2016,field experiments on leaf-level trace gas exchange of nitric oxide (NO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), and ozone (O3) were conducted for thefirst time on the native American tree species Pinus strobus (eastern white pine), Acer rubrum (redmaple), Populus grandidentata (bigtooth aspen), and Quercus rubra (red oak) in a temperate hardwood forest inMichigan, USA. We measured the leaf-level trace gas exchange rates andinvestigated the existence of an NO2 compensation point, hypothesizedbased on a comparison of a previously observed average diurnal cycle ofNOx (NO2+NO) concentrations with that simulated using amulti-layer canopy exchange model. Known amounts of trace gases wereintroduced into a tree branch enclosure and a paired blank referenceenclosure. The trace gas concentrations before and after the enclosures weremeasured, as well as the enclosed leaf area (single-sided) and gas flow rate to obtain the trace gas fluxes with respect to leaf surface. There was nodetectable NO uptake for all tree types. The foliar NO2 and O3uptake largely followed a diurnal cycle, correlating with that of the leafstomatal conductance. NO2 and O3 fluxes were driven by theirconcentration gradient from ambient to leaf internal space. The NO2 loss rate at the leaf surface, equivalently the foliar NO2 deposition velocity toward the leaf surface, ranged from 0 to 3.6 mm s−1 for bigtooth aspen and from 0 to 0.76 mm s−1 for red oak, both of which are∼90 % of the expected values based on the stomatalconductance of water. The deposition velocities for red maple and white pineranged from 0.3 to 1.6 and from 0.01 to 1.1 mm s−1, respectively, and were lower than predicted from the stomatal conductance, implying amesophyll resistance to the uptake. Additionally, for white pine, theextrapolated velocity at zero stomatal conductance was 0.4±0.08 mm s−1, indicating a non-stomatal uptake pathway. The NO2compensation point was ≤60 ppt for all four tree species andindistinguishable from zero at the 95 % confidence level. This agrees withrecent reports for several European and California tree species butcontradicts some earlier experimental results where the compensation pointswere found to be on the order of 1 ppb or higher. Given that the sampledtree types represent 80 %–90 % of the total leaf area at this site, theseresults negate the previously hypothesized important role of a leaf-scaleNO2 compensation point. Consequently, to reconcile these findings,further detailed comparisons between the observed and simulated in- and above-canopy NOx concentrations and the leaf- and canopy-scaleNOx fluxes, using the multi-layer canopy exchange model withconsideration of the leaf-scale NOx deposition velocities as well asstomatal conductances reported here, are recommended.more » « less
