<?xml-model href='http://www.tei-c.org/release/xml/tei/custom/schema/relaxng/tei_all.rng' schematypens='http://relaxng.org/ns/structure/1.0'?><TEI xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0">
	<teiHeader>
		<fileDesc>
			<titleStmt><title level='a'>Testing the occurrence of Late Jurassic true polar wander using the La Negra volcanics of northern Chile</title></titleStmt>
			<publicationStmt>
				<publisher></publisher>
				<date>01/01/2020</date>
			</publicationStmt>
			<sourceDesc>
				<bibl> 
					<idno type="par_id">10128526</idno>
					<idno type="doi">10.1016/j.epsl.2019.115835</idno>
					<title level='j'>Earth and Planetary Science Letters</title>
<idno>0012-821X</idno>
<biblScope unit="volume">529</biblScope>
<biblScope unit="issue">C</biblScope>					

					<author>Roger R. Fu</author><author>Dennis V. Kent</author><author>Sidney R. Hemming</author><author>Pablo Gutiérrez</author><author>Jessica R. Creveling</author>
				</bibl>
			</sourceDesc>
		</fileDesc>
		<profileDesc>
			<abstract><ab><![CDATA[True polar wander (TPW) is the reorientation of the crust-mantle system driven by the redistribution of masses in the mantle and on the Earth's surface. In the ideal case, characterization of TPW requires paleomagnetic constraints on the motion of all major plates and independent reconstructions of relative plate positions. While such complete datasets are absent for pre-Mesozoic TPW inferences due to the absence of oceanic plates, they are available for the Late Jurassic (165-145 Ma) "monster shift", a ∼30 • amplitude proposed TPW event. Here we perform paleomagnetic sampling and Ar-Ar geochronology on the La Negra volcanics of Northern Chile, producing two new paleomagnetic poles with ages 165.8 ± 1.8 Ma (1σ ; 84.3 • N 0.9 • E; α 95 = 7.6 • ; N = 28) and 152.8 ± 0.8 Ma (84.5 • N 256.4 • E; α 95 = 10.8 • ; N = 18). By combining these data with other recently published results, we compute a net lithospheric rotation of 25.3 • ± 7.3 • (1σ ) at a mean rate of 1.21 • ± 0.35 • My -1 between 170 and 145 Ma with a peak rate of 1.46 • ± 0.65 • My -1 between 160 and 145 Ma. These rates are consistent with inferences from the Pacific Plate, implying true whole lithosphere rotation. Given coherent motion involving the entire lithosphere, we conclude that the Earth underwent rapid TPW between approximately 165 and 145 Ma, potentially driven by the cessation of subduction along the western North American margin.]]></ab></abstract>
		</profileDesc>
	</teiHeader>
	<text><body xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="1.">Introduction</head><p>True polar wander, or TPW, is the reorientation of the entire crust-mantle system of a planet with respect to its rotation axis <ref type="bibr">(Gold, 1955)</ref>. Redistribution of mass on the Earth's surface or in the deep interior can change the energetically favorable axis of rotation, which tends to align with the axis of highest moment of inertia. On the modern Earth, a combination of modern melting due to climate warming, ongoing effects from the last ice age cycle, and longer timescale mantle processes induce TPW at the rate of &#8764;1 &#8226; My -1 <ref type="bibr">(Gordon, 1995;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gross and Vondrak, 1999)</ref>, although the total amplitude of deglaciation-induced TPW is expected to be less than 1 &#8226; <ref type="bibr">(Mitrovica et al., 2015)</ref>.</p><p>Observations that constrain TPW in the geological past can contribute to knowledge of both mantle dynamics and surface environmental change <ref type="bibr">(Evans, 2003)</ref>. The orientation of the TPW axis and the rate and total amplitude of rotation are influenced by the viscosity of the mantle, the distribution of mantle mass anomalies, and the elastic thickness of the lithosphere <ref type="bibr">(Tsai and Stevenson, 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Creveling et al., 2012;</ref><ref type="bibr">Greff-Lefftz and Besse, 2014;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chan et al., 2014)</ref>. Inferences of past TPW have therefore been used to constrain the stability of deep mantle density structure and the occurrence of subduction and mantle plumes through time <ref type="bibr">(Robert et al., 2018)</ref>. At the same time, studies of paleoenvironments and sea-level records motivate robust determinations of TPW due to the potentially large associated shifts in latitude, local climate, and local sea-level with amplitudes of up to 100 m <ref type="bibr">(Mound and Mitrovica, 1998;</ref><ref type="bibr">Mound et al., 1999;</ref><ref type="bibr">Muttoni and Kent, 2016)</ref>.</p><p>Temporally resolved paleomagnetic data underpin all inferences of rapid, large amplitude TPW events in the geological past. However, the translation and rotation of tectonic plates inferred from paleomagnetism may instead arise from relative motion over the underlying mantle, referred to hereafter as "plate tectonic motions". Reliable constraints on past TPW events must be able to deconvolve the contributions of TPW from plate tectonic motions.</p><p>Observation of coherent rotation of all sampled tectonic plates alone is insufficient to identify TPW because the entire lithospheric frame of reference may have a velocity relative to the underlying mantle (i.e., spherical harmonic degree 1 plate tectonics motion). However, such relative motion between the entire lithosphere and the mantle is believed to be slow [&#8804;0.2 &#8226; My -1 ; Jurdy and <ref type="bibr">Van der Voo, 1974;</ref><ref type="bibr">O'Connell and Hager, 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rudolph and Zhong, 2014]</ref>. As such, observations of rapid ( 0.2 &#8226; My -1 ) net rotation of the lithosphere have been interpreted as robust evidence for TPW [e.g., <ref type="bibr">Van der Voo, 1994;</ref><ref type="bibr">Maloof et al., 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Mitchell et al., 2010]</ref>. Note here we use the term "net lithospheric rotation" in the kinematic sense, describing the observed rotation of the whole Earth surface about an equatorial axis. This usage contrasts with some published works where "net lithospheric rotation" refers specifically to plate tectonics motion of the whole lithosphere over the mantle [e.g., <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2010]</ref>.</p><p>Quantifying net lithosphere rotation requires high-quality paleomagnetic data from a large fraction of the Earth's lithospheric plates in conjunction with robust plate reconstructions that provide their relative longitudinal positions. Critically, paleomagnetic datasets prior to 200 Ma lack any coverage of the Earth's oceanic plates, which likely covered more than 50% of the Earth's surface area. Hence, pre-200 Ma paleomagnetic data can only quantify net continental rotation, which must then be extrapolated by assumption to net rotation of the entire lithosphere to constrain TPW. Likewise, significant uncertainties arise in paleogeographic reconstructions of continents prior to &#8764;250 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Muttoni et al., 2003)</ref>, with radically different interpretations proposed by middle Neoproterozoic time <ref type="bibr">[&#8764;750 Ma;</ref><ref type="bibr">Swanson-Hysell et al., 2012]</ref>.</p><p>As such, quantification of the true net lithospheric rotation rate, not only the net continental rotation rate, is currently feasible only during the past &#8764;200 Ma. Therefore, the highest confidence identifications of TPW are possible only during this recent time interval. Thorough understanding of such a recent TPW event, complete with precise inferences of TPW duration and path, can be used to analyze the geophysical causes of TPW and inform the interpretation of TPW and its implications for mantle dynamics in the deeper past.</p><p>Several compilations of paleomagnetic data have argued for large amplitude TPW occurring during the Jurassic Period . Using paleogeographical reconstructions based on marine magnetic anomalies, previous studies have rotated contemporaneous paleomagnetic poles from different continents into composite poles within a single coordinate system <ref type="bibr">(Besse and Courtillot, 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving, 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2012)</ref>. A series of such composite poles at different ages make up a composite apparent polar wander (APW) path that can be used to quantify the net rotation of all continental plates whose relative positions in the ancient past are known from well-dated marine magnetic lineations.</p><p>Two recently published composite APW paths support the idea that net continental rotation was anomalously rapid during the Jurassic Period <ref type="bibr">(Kent and Irving, 2010;</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2012)</ref>. Both studies infer total rotations of 30.5 &#8226; -39.9 &#8226; between 200 and 140 Ma and broadly agree on an equatorial rotation axis near West Africa. However, while <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2012)</ref> favored steady rotation at a rate of &#8804;0.8 &#8226; My -1 throughout the Jurassic, <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving (2010)</ref> argued for a phase of rapid rotation between 160 and 145 Ma at rates up to 2.0 &#8226; My -1 , which they termed the Jurassic "monster shift." These differences in the maximum rate and duration of net continental rotation imply dramatically different geodynamical conditions in the mantle and the lithosphere and/or different geometry of the Earth's non-equilibrium figure [e.g., <ref type="bibr">Creveling et al., 2012]</ref>.</p><p>The key differences in the two compilations stem from the choice of included paleomagnetic poles. <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2012)</ref> com-puted a quality-weighted mean of all available igneous and sedimentary paleomagnetic poles whereas <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving (2010)</ref> adopted only poles derived from igneous or inclination errorcorrected sedimentary rocks. Furthermore, the latter compilation excluded all poles from the Colorado Plateau, which are predominantly based on sedimentary rocks that have not been corrected for inclination shallowing and may have undergone clockwise vertical axis rotation with respect to cratonic North America by 4 &#8226; to &gt;10 &#8226; <ref type="bibr">(Steiner, 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Bryan and Gordon, 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kent and Witte, 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Steiner, 2003)</ref>. As a result, the composite APW path of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2012)</ref> may be susceptible to systematic biases from unreliable paleomagnetic results while that of <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving (2010)</ref> may suffer from the small number of constituent poles, including only five poles in the critical 165-140 Ma interval.</p><p>More recently published paleomagnetic data have contributed additional constraints on net continental rotation in the Late Jurassic. Two poles based on well-dated North America kimberlites <ref type="bibr">(Kent et al., 2015)</ref> combined with an updated pole for the igneous Chon Aike Formation of Patagonia reinforce the position of the composite APW path at 155-157 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Ruiz Gonz&#225;lez et al., 2019)</ref>, although these poles do not strongly distinguish between the two previously published composite APW paths. Meanwhile, inclination shallowing correction of sedimentary rock-derived paleomagnetic poles from Adria and North Africa support rapid continental rotation with rates up to 2.5 &#8226; My -1 between &#8764;183 and 145 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Muttoni et al., 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Muttoni and Kent, 2019)</ref>. Finally, a paleomagnetic study of the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) core 801B showed that the Pacific Plate, which was kinematically coupled to all the major oceanic plates of the Pacific Basin, likely experienced a rapid northward motion in the 157-147 Ma interval <ref type="bibr">(Fu and Kent, 2018)</ref>. If corroborated by a refined continental composite APW path, this apparent consistency between the inferred motions of the continental and Pacific Basin plates would provide strong evidence that the monster shift represents rotation of the entire lithosphere-mantle frame.</p><p>In this work, we present a refined net rotation rate of Late Jurassic continents based on two new igneous rock-based paleomagnetic poles from the La Negra Formation of northern Chile. These poles, based on a total of 46 cooling units, have ages of 165.8 &#177; 1.8 Ma and 152.8 &#177; 0.8 Ma based on our Ar-Ar geochronology experiments. By combining these new data with six additional igneous rock-derived paleomagnetic poles from the 165-140 Ma interval, three of which were published or revised after the previous compilations of paleomagnetic data discussed above, we place the strongest constraints to-date on the timing and rate of observed lithospheric rotation in the Late Jurassic Period. We then discuss the implications of this rotation on the occurrence of TPW and its possible geodynamical drivers.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.">Samples and methods</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.1.">Geological setting and previous paleomagnetic results</head><p>The La Negra Formation is an extensive succession of Late Jurassic basaltic-andesitic volcanics with up to 1400 m thickness exposed along the northern coast of Chile between latitudes 22 &#8226; S and 30 &#8226; S <ref type="bibr">(Buchelt and Tellez Cancino, 1988)</ref>. It is one of several volcanic units of similar composition emplaced along the South American margin during the Jurassic Period referred to locally as the Camaraca, Oficina Viz, and Nacientes del Biob&#237;o Formations <ref type="bibr">(SERNAGEOMIN, 2003)</ref>. The isotopic and trace element compositions of the La Negra Formation show evidence for significant crustal contamination, which has been used to argue for emplacement in a backarc basin setting <ref type="bibr">(Buchelt and Tellez Cancino, 1988;</ref><ref type="bibr">Rogers and Hawkesworth, 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">Pichowiak et al., 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kramer et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Lucassen et al., 2006)</ref>.</p><p>In the Topopilla area, the La Negra Formation is composed of successive lava flows of between 1 and 5 m thickness. In a transect of 102 flows, we observed only a single &lt;10 cm thick horizon of intercalated, fine-grained sedimentary rock at locality C (see below). The rarity of sedimentary deposits and the lack of observed pillow structures imply that lava emplacement was nearly wholly sub-aerial. Compared to the La Negra Formation at its type locality near Antofagasta, exposures in the Tocopilla region have experienced weaker post-emplacement deformation, showing uniform bedding with low eastward dips in the 10-25 &#8226; range. This tilting may be associated with the formation of the Bolivian Orocline, which affected the western margin of South America between approximately 15 &#8226; S and 30 &#8226; S throughout the Paleogene and Neogene <ref type="bibr">(Rousse et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Arriagada et al., 2008)</ref>. Previous paleomagnetic studies of Jurassic to Neogene age rocks throughout these regions have demonstrated that the coastal volcanic units in the Antofagasta-Tocopilla area display no resolvable rotations relative to cratonic South America, although with significant uncertainty due to large observed paleosecular variations [net rotation of 2.2 &#8226; &#177; 6.2 &#8226; west; <ref type="bibr">Arriagada et al., 2003]</ref>. Based on the lack of rotations observed in a &gt;150 km segment of the coast between Antofagasta and Tocopilla and the uniformly shallow dip of La Negra flows near Tocopilla, we conclude that our sampling localities are unlikely to have been affected significantly by vertical axis rotations.</p><p>One previous paleomagnetic study of the La Negra volcanics by <ref type="bibr">Goguitchaichvili et al. (2003)</ref> produced a Jurassic-age paleomagnetic pole based on 280 specimens from 32 successive lava flows (approximate location 22.35 &#8226; S 70.25 &#8226; W); these authors subjected samples to alternating field (AF) demagnetization, which revealed samples with both normal and reversed polarities. However, the age of the sampled succession was constrained by only a low precision Rb-Sr age of 187 &#177; 13 Ma, which is more than 20 My older than any subsequent Ar-Ar age recovered from the La Negra Formation <ref type="bibr">(Rogers and Hawkesworth, 1989;</ref><ref type="bibr">Oliveros et al., 2006)</ref>. Furthermore, our thermal demagnetization data consistently revealed present-day viscous remanent magnetization (VRM) overprints that are routinely stronger than any high temperature magnetization. Therefore, we consider the application of thermal demagnetization, which is more effective than AF treatment in the removal of VRM, to be vital for the analysis of these samples.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.2.">Paleomagnetic experiments</head><p>We sampled exposures of La Negra Formation lava flows at five localities designated A-E (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>). Localities A and B sample the base and top, respectively, of a single &gt;1 km thick, continuous section of lava flows located 5 km south of Tocopilla. Similarly, locality D is located 4 km inland from locality E and samples stratigraphically higher lava flows of the same continuous section. Locality C is situated on the coast &#8764;4 km north of locality E and is separated from localities D and E by a dextral strike-slip fault of &#8764;10 km mapped length <ref type="bibr">(Medina, 2012)</ref>.</p><p>At each locality, we collected between 4 and 6 oriented samples from each lava flow in a continuous transect. At localities A, B, D, and E, we drilled 2.5 cm diameter cores oriented using a magnetic compass. We also oriented one core in each flow using a sun compass, which showed the lack of orientation biases due to local magnetic fields. At locality C, we collected between two and three oriented block samples from each flow. Each block sample then yielded between one and four 2.5 cm diameter cores. In total, our sampling campaign resulted in 503 oriented specimens from 102 lava flows.</p><p>We subjected all samples to stepwise thermal demagnetization up to 585 &#8226; C to 700 &#8226; C in 18-20 steps with spacing between 10 &#8226; C and 40 &#8226; C. The magnetic moment of each sample was measured using a 2G Enterprises model 760 superconducting rock magne-  <ref type="bibr">(Kirschvink, 1980)</ref>.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="2.3.">Ar-Ar geochronology experiments</head><p>Previous radiometric ages of the La Negra volcanics in the Tocopilla area include Ar-Ar plateau ages between 155.6 &#177; 1.4 and 164.9 &#177; 1.7 Ma, the latter of which was taken from our paleomagnetic locality A <ref type="bibr">(Oliveros et al., 2006)</ref>. In the same previous study, a low quality plateau age of 160.1 &#177; 1.5 Ma was also derived from &lt;1 km south of our locality B, which is consistent with its stratigraphic position above locality A. To refine these previous results and to provide radiometric ages for each of our paleomagnetic sampling localities, we allocated between two and four 2.5 cm core samples from each locality for mineral separation using a SelFrag&#169; electric pulse disaggregation system. We then isolated groundmass and plagioclase samples from each core sample and subjected them to neutron irradiation and step-wise laser heating at the LDEO Argon Laboratory.  40 Ar/ 39 Ar age and Ca/K ratio spectra obtained from our stepwise heating experiments. Shown are representative high quality data from each of the five localities used to obtain locality level mean ages. See Table <ref type="table">1</ref> and Supplemental Materials for summary of all geochronology results and raw isotopic composition measurements. Samples were co-irradiated with Fish Canyon sanidine, [28.201 Ma; <ref type="bibr">Kuiper et al., 2008]</ref> at the USGS TRIGA reactor in Denver for 8 h. Samples were loaded into tantalum tubes, then into 5 pit planchets, and incrementally heated using a PhotonMachines diode laser. Low temperature steps for all of the samples were finished prior to high temperature steps. Following a 10 min cleanup with ST101 getters at 2 A, gas was introduced into a VG5400 noble gas mass spectrometer and isotopes were measured by peak hopping on an analogue multiplier system. Blanks were analyzed every four unknown analyses and air pipettes (&#8764;4 &#215; 10 -14 mol) were analyzed every twelve unknown analyses (bracketed by blanks). Atmospheric 40 Ar/ 36 Ar corrections were made using the time series of these blanks and airs. The measured 40 Ar/ 36 Ar for the air pipettes during the interval of these analyses was 279.64 &#177; 3.01 for measurements on locality C samples and 281.46 &#177; 1.47 for all others.</p><p>These corrections were made to the published value of 298.6 following <ref type="bibr">Lee et al. (2006)</ref>. Corrections for nuclear interferences were based on <ref type="bibr">Dalrymple et al. (1981)</ref>. All raw geochronological data are available in the supplementary materials.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="3.">Results</head><p>The Ar-Ar ages derived from our stepwise degassing experiments are given in Fig. <ref type="figure">2</ref> and Table <ref type="table">1</ref>. The full collection of data is available in the supplement. Due to disturbance in the low temperature Ar releases, possibly related to Cretaceous age intrusives, we only consider well-defined plateau ages that contain more than 50% of the released 39 Ar and consist of at least three consecutive heating steps with mutually indistinguishable 40 Ar/ 39 Ar ages. Further, although we conducted stepwise heating experiments on both  <ref type="bibr">(Kramer et al., 2005)</ref>. We therefore focus our further analyses on groundmass samples. Applying these quality criteria and a correction for the initial Ar composition based on isochron results, we find that one sample from each locality A, D and E and three samples each from locality B and C yielded acceptable ages (Tables <ref type="table">1</ref><ref type="table">2</ref>). Although sample A2 produced a plateau age, its much younger value (153.7 &#177; 0.5 Ma) is inconsistent with the lower stratigraphic location of locality A compared to locality B. Furthermore, the previously published Ar-Ar plateau age of 164.9 &#177; 0.9 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Oliveros et al., 2006)</ref> for locality A is more consistent with the 169.3 &#177; 0.4 Ma age from our AB4 sample. We therefore adopt results from sample AB4 as the best constraints on the age of locality A.</p><p>Between the two northern localities A and B, the 7.1 My younger age of locality B is consistent with its stratigraphically higher position. Given the &#8764;1450 m stratigraphic displacement between the age-dated sites in localities A and B and assuming a typical flow thickness of 3 m, we estimate an approximate mean eruption interval of 15 ky per flow.</p><p>Ar-Ar plateau ages from the three southern localities C-E are uniformly younger than those from the northern localities. The indistinguishable ages from localities D and E, which are separated by more than 1 km of stratigraphy, suggest a more rapid rate of flow emplacement compared to that implied by localities A and B. Due to the presence of a fault between locality C and the D-E section (Fig. <ref type="figure">1</ref>), the relative stratigraphic position of locality C is uncertain and cannot be used to verify the Ar-Ar ages. The small age difference between these localities is consistent with a limited amount of relative motion.</p><p>To ensure sufficient data for reliable paleomagnetic poles, we group the data from the northern localities A and B into a single pole with weighted mean age 165.8 &#177; 1.8 Ma and localities C-E into another dataset with weighted mean age 152.8 &#177; 0.8 Ma (Table <ref type="table">2</ref>). For these mean ages, we computed approximate 1&#963; uncertainties assuming that the range of locality ages in each group represents a 2&#963; spread.</p><p>Our analysis of thermal demagnetization sequences shows that 262 specimens carry a low temperature (LT) component of magnetization generally blocked below 320 &#8226; C with maximum angular deviation (MAD) less than 15 &#8226; and encompassing more than 5 demagnetization steps <ref type="bibr">(Figs. 3,</ref><ref type="bibr">S1)</ref>. Although approximately 10% of LT components display widely scattered directions, which may be due to contamination from recent lightning strikes, the mean LT direction (D = 354.6 &#8226; , I = -35.7 &#8226; , &#945; 95 = 4.0 &#8226; ) is consistent with a recent VRM, which has an expected direction of due north with -38.9 &#8226; inclination.</p><p>We found that 414 specimens carry a high temperature (HT) component of magnetization blocked between approximately 300 &#8226; C and 585 &#8226; C (Fig. <ref type="figure">3</ref>). After excluding HT components with MAD greater than 15 &#8226; , we computed the site mean direction and precision parameter k for each of 102 cooling units. To exclude data with spurious magnetization directions caused by poor rock magnetic recording fidelity, lightning, or remagnetization, we focused further analysis on the 52 low-scatter sites with at least 3 samples and k &#8805; 50 (Supplementary Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>).</p><p>Two sites in locality B (BA and BE) and three sites in locality D (DH, DI, and DJ) exhibit anomalous directions that, combined with the consecutive stratigraphic locations of these sites, strongly suggest that they record transitional magnetic fields (Fig. <ref type="figure">4</ref>). In addition, the anomalous direction of site EE and its location between surrounding sites of normal and reversed polarity suggest the occurrence of another transitional geodynamo regime. Together, transitional fields are recorded in 12% of our sites, which is much higher than the present-day expectation of 1-2 reversals of &#8764;10 4 y duration per million years <ref type="bibr">(Clement, 2004)</ref>. However, a high rate of geomagnetic field reversals has been documented in the Late Jurassic <ref type="bibr">(Steiner et al., 1987)</ref>, which is associated with the Jurassic Quiet Zone identified in marine magnetic surveys <ref type="bibr">(Handschumacher et al., 1988)</ref>. Reversal frequencies of up to 10 per million years estimated from seafloor magnetic anomalies in the 170-156 Ma interval correspond to a &#8764;10% probability of capturing transitional directions assuming a &#8764;10 4 y duration for reversals <ref type="bibr">(Tominaga et al., 2008)</ref>, which is fully consistent with our observations.</p><p>To characterize further the stability of the Late Jurassic magnetic field, we quantify the amplitude of paleosecular variation (PSV) by computing the angular standard deviation (S B ) of virtual geomagnetic poles (VGPs) from our tilt-corrected site means. After obtaining VGPS for each of 52 sites that pass our quality criteria (see above and Table <ref type="table">S1</ref>) and applying a commonlyadopted cutoff angle of 45 &#8226; to exclude transitional site directions, we find S B = 22.6 &#8226; . Such a high S B is nearly a factor of two higher than for the 0-5 Ma lava data <ref type="bibr">(Opdyke et al., 2015;</ref><ref type="bibr">Cromwell et al., 2018)</ref> and comparable to the largest documented PSV amplitudes during and subsequent to the Mesozoic <ref type="bibr">(Biggin et al., 2008;</ref><ref type="bibr">Doubrovine et al., 2019)</ref>. Computing S B separately for each of the five localities resulted in wide scatter between 15.7 &#8226; and 34.6 &#8226; , suggesting that potentially unaccounted for differential tectonic motion among our sampling localities cannot explain the large scatter. Our data therefore supports previous suggestions that the Late Jurassic, at least in certain intervals, was a time of low dipole field stability <ref type="bibr">(Palmer et al., 1980;</ref><ref type="bibr">Iglesia Llanos et al., 2003;</ref><ref type="bibr">Biggin et al., 2008)</ref>.</p><p>Of the remaining 46 sites that have low within-site scatter and show non-transitional directions, 21 and 25 display normal and reversed polarities, respectively. After gathering tilt-corrected site directions into the 165.8 Ma and 152.8 Ma age groups, we found that the 28 sites of the older group pass a reversal test with confidence classification C [critical angle &#947; c = 16.4 &#8226; ; observed angle = 15.8 &#8226; McFadden and <ref type="bibr">McElhinny, 1990]</ref>, while the 18 sites of the younger group yield an indeterminate reversal test (&#947; c = 29.0; observed angle = 18.6 &#8226; ). Due to the similar, eastward dipping bedding attitudes of all five localities, a formal fold test is not possible. Even so, we observe that the precision parameter k of all passing sites, after conversion to normal polarity, is 8.2 and 8.9 in in-situ and tilt-corrected coordinates, respectively. This is consistent with a pre-folding age of remanence while indicating that the directional scatter among sites is dominated by PSV instead of bedding attitude variations. Based on the presence of normal and reversed polarities, the passed reversal test for the older age group, and the origin-trending nature of the HT component, we conclude that this magnetization represents a primary record of magnetic fields during lava flow emplacement. Finally, we computed paleomagnetic poles for 165.8 and 152.8 Ma using HT component directions in tilt-corrected coordinates (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>; Table <ref type="table">3</ref>). We find an 8.9 &#8226; displacement between the two poles, which is not distinguishable at the 95% confidence level. To facilitate comparison with other paleomagnetic poles in the 170-140 Ma time interval, we rotated our paleomagnetic poles into a South African reference frame. Due to uncertainty in the relative paleogeographic position of South America with respect to Africa, especially regarding the partitioning of intraplate deformation within both continents <ref type="bibr">(Eagles, 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">N&#252;rnberg and M&#252;ller, 1991;</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2009)</ref>, multiple Euler rotations have been proposed to map between South American and South African coordinates <ref type="bibr">(Lottes and Rowley, 1990;</ref><ref type="bibr">N&#252;rnberg and M&#252;ller, 1991;</ref><ref type="bibr">K&#246;nig and Jokat, 2006;</ref><ref type="bibr">Eagles, 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., 2008</ref><ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al., , 2009))</ref>. To quantify the effect of the chosen South America-South Africa reconstruction on the resulting global APW path, we computed our poles in South African coordinates using the rotation parameters of both <ref type="bibr">Lottes and Rowley (1990)</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>, which are representative of models that incorporate low and significant levels of intra-plate displacements within South America, respectively (Table <ref type="table">3</ref>).</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.">Discussion</head></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.1.">Net continental rotation in the Late Jurassic</head><p>We combine our computed paleomagnetic poles at 165.8 and 152.8 Ma with existing high-fidelity poles to derive the rate of net continental motion during the Jurassic Period. We include only well-dated, igneous rock-derived paleomagnetic poles in the 200-140 Ma interval and translate them into South African coordinates using the finite rotation parameters of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>, which applies a 3 &#8226; intra-plate rotation between Patagonia and cratonic South America (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>). For poles between 200 and 170 Ma, we adopt the compilation of <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving (2010)</ref>, which excludes sedimentary rock-based poles due to the potential for inclination error <ref type="bibr">(Kent and Tauxe, 2005)</ref>. Similarly for the 170-140 Ma interval, we begin with the igneous pole compilation of <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving (2010)</ref>, which excludes poles from the Colorado Plateau due to the possibility of vertical axis rotations. We modify this compilation by adding five new or revised igneous poles published after 2010. We also initially exclude the poles from the Moat Volcanics, Prospect Dolerite, Hinlopenstretet intrusives due to geochronological uncertainties (see below and Supplementary Materials). We retain three poles derived from kimberlites in both South Africa and North America despite the small number of sites samples <ref type="bibr">(Van Fossen and Kent, 1993;</ref><ref type="bibr">Hargraves et al., 1997;</ref><ref type="bibr">Kent et al., 2015)</ref>. Based on our simulations of PSV sampling, the observation of highly concordant normal and reversed polarity magnetizations in the North American kimberlites strongly suggests that the directions adequately average PSV (see Supplementary Materials). In the case of the South African kimberlites, the presence of normal and reverse polarities in sub-equal proportions suggests sampling of the geomagnetic field at distinct times <ref type="bibr">(Hargraves, 1989)</ref>. Our simulations that the availability of six dis- tinct sites permits accurate estimation of the mean geomagnetic field direction with a total &#945; 95 of 10.3 &#8226; (Table <ref type="table">3</ref>; Supplementary Materials). These modifications result in a total of eight poles in our compilation for the 170-145 Ma interval. We then group all Red points indicate inclination shallowing-corrected poles from Adria <ref type="bibr">(Muttoni and Kent, 2019)</ref>. Poles used to compute 170-145 Ma averages are given in Table <ref type="table">3</ref>. Circles denote the 95% confidence interval.</p><p>poles in bins of 20 My width, resulting in composite poles for <ref type="bibr">200, 190, 180, 170, and 160</ref> Ma. Due to the ages of available data, we compute a nominal 145 Ma mean pole using the 146.0 and 146.4 Ma kimberlite poles from South Africa and North America, respectively (Table <ref type="table">4</ref>). Although this last composite igneous pole consists of only two paleomagnetic data points, inclination</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head>Table 3</head><p>Paleomagnetic poles derived from igneous rocks between 165 and 140 Ma used, except where noted, in our calculation of net continental rotation rate during the monster shift. La Negra North and La Negra South refer to the mean paleomagnetic poles derived from our sampling localities A-B and C-E, respectively. The La Negra poles are given in South American coordinates and rotated into South African coordinates using the paleogeographic reconstructions of <ref type="bibr">Lottes and Rowley (1990)</ref> and <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>. The remaining seven previously published poles are rotated into South African coordinates using the parameters of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>  shallowing-corrected sedimentary poles from Adria strongly corroborate its position <ref type="bibr">(Muttoni and Kent, 2019)</ref>.</p><p>To understand the uncertainties introduced by the choice of paleogeographic reconstructions on our APW path, we compute the rate of apparent polar motion between 170 and 145 Ma using different plate models for the Late Jurassic. We account for the uncertainty in both age and paleopole position for all nine igneous paleomagnetic poles by assuming an 1&#963; age uncertainty of &#177;2.5</p><p>My for each composite pole and using a Monte Carlo resampling algorithm to generate 10 4 synthetic APW paths. We then compute the APW velocity along the best-fit great circle and its uncertainty from these synthetic datasets. We find that our reference pole compilation, which uses the paleogeographic reconstructions of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>, implies an APW rate of 1.21 &#8226; &#177; 0.34 &#8226; My -1 (1&#963; ) between 170 and 145 Ma (Figs. <ref type="figure">5,</ref><ref type="figure">6</ref>). Recomputing our compiled poles in South African coordinates using the reconstruction of <ref type="bibr">Lottes and Rowley (1990)</ref>, which does not include intra-plate displacements in South America, yields an indistinguishable APW rate of 1.15 &#8226; &#177; 0.36 &#8226; My -1 during the same time interval. We therefore conclude that the choice of continental reconstruction has a negligible effect on the composite APW path.</p><p>Next, we test the effect of excluding or including specific paleomagnetic poles. Among our five poles in the 153-158 Ma interval (Table <ref type="table">3</ref>), the Patagonian Chon Aike and El Quemado Formation poles may be affected by intra-plate deformation not accounted for in our adopted continental reconstructions [e.g., <ref type="bibr">K&#246;nig and Jokat, 2006]</ref>. We find that our 170-145 Ma APW path without the Patagonian poles corresponds to a slightly slower rotation rate of 1.20 &#8226; &#177; 0.34 &#8226; My -1 . Testing the sensitivity of our results to the inclusion of additional paleomagnetic poles, retaining poles from the poorly dated (see supplementary materials) Moat Volcanics (&#8764;169 Ma) and Prospect Dolerite (&#8764;168 Ma) changes our derived rotation rate to 1.24 &#8226; &#177; 0.35 &#8226; My -1 . All of the above rates are mutually indistinguishable, implying that our composite APW path is robust with respect to assumed paleogeography and the choice of the most reliable igneous rock-derived paleomagnetic poles.</p><p>After establishing a reliable composite APW path in South Africa coordinates, we compute the net rotation of all major continental plates following the methodology of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2010)</ref>. First, we separately quantify the motion of Gondwana and Laurasia as Euler rotations. For Gondwana we fit our composite APW path in South African coordinates to small circle rotations while for Laurentia we also incorporate North Atlantic spreading velocities based on the plate reconstructions of <ref type="bibr">Torsvik et al. (2008)</ref>. We then integrate the angular velocity vector of surface elements within continental land areas using continental shape models from <ref type="bibr">Seton et al. (2012)</ref>. We exclude the United China Block from our analysis due to the lack of reliable reconstructions owing to the lack of surviving, well-dated marine magnetic anomalies linking it to other continents <ref type="bibr">(Cogn&#233; et al., 2005;</ref><ref type="bibr">Van der Voo et al., 2015)</ref>.</p><p>The resulting mean net continental rotation rate between 170 and 145 Ma is 1.21   </p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="4.2.">Implications for Late Jurassic TPW</head><p>Our new 165.8 and 152.8 Ma paleomagnetic poles, combined with previous studies (Table <ref type="table">3</ref>), provide strong evidence that the Late Jurassic monster shift consisted of a net continental rotation of 25.3 &#8226; &#177; 7.3 &#8226; with a peak rate of 1.46 &#8226; &#177; 0.65 &#8226; My -1 . Available igneous rock-derived paleomagnetic poles constrain the duration of this rotation to between at least 155 and 145 Ma, although due to the lack of high reliability igneous poles between &#8764;180 and 165.8 Ma [see Supplementary Materials; <ref type="bibr">Kent and Irving, 2010]</ref>, the initiation of the shift may have occurred as early as 170 to 175 Ma (Fig. <ref type="figure">5</ref>). Meanwhile, 130-140 Ma paleomagnetic poles derived from igneous rocks in South America and Africa suggest that the rotation had ceased or reversed direction by &#8764;140 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Kent and Irving, 2010)</ref>.</p><p>Our net continental rotation computations shows that Laurasia and Gondwana, which accounted for approximately one-third of the Earth's surface area during the Late Jurassic <ref type="bibr">(Seton et al., 2012)</ref>, participated in the monster shift event. Direct constraints on the motion of the remaining two-thirds of the Earth surface, which consisted predominantly of the oceanic plates of the Pacific Basin, are scarce due to the small area of Jurassic-age Pacific Plate that is presently preserved. Paleomagnetic data taken from the Ocean Drilling Program (ODP) core 801B show that the Pacific Plate underwent steady southward drift during the Late Jurassic through Early Cretaceous except for a brief interval between &#8764;157 and 147 Ma, although depositional hiatuses permit an early initiation of motion at &#8764;161 Ma <ref type="bibr">(Larson et al., 1992;</ref><ref type="bibr">Fu and Kent, 2018)</ref>. During this time of anomalous motion, the Pacific Plate underwent northward drift with a velocity of 1.45 &#8226; &#177; 0.76 &#8226; My -1 , which is in close agreement with the expected northward drift rate of 1.46 &#8226; &#177; 0.65 &#8226; My -1 during the same time interval based on our computed continental rotation rate and assuming a Pacific Plate paleolongitude of 100 &#8226; W [Fig. <ref type="figure">6</ref>; <ref type="bibr">Fu and Kent, 2018]</ref>. This correspondence between the timing and maximum rate of motion for both the continental and the Pacific Basin plates strongly suggests that whole Earth lithosphere participated in a single rotation.</p><p>The coherent motion of the entire Earth surface may be due to relative motion of the lithosphere over the mantle, TPW, or a combination of both processes. The rate of net lithospheric rotation in the past &#8764;130 My can be quantified using observations of hotspot motion, which yields an average rate of &#8764;0.2 &#8226; My -1 , with 0.44 &#8226; My -1 as an extreme value <ref type="bibr">(Jurdy and Van der Voo, 1974;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gordon and Jurdy, 1986;</ref><ref type="bibr">Gripp and Gordon, 2002)</ref>. Numerical models broadly agree that typical net rotation rates between the lithosphere and mantle on the modern Earth are expected to be in the 0.1 &#8226; -0.2 &#8226; My -1 range <ref type="bibr">(Rudolph and Zhong, 2014)</ref>. The inferred Late Jurassic monster shift was therefore more than seven times faster than typical documented or theorized cases of net lithosphere rotation relative to the mantle and more than three times faster than the highest proposed value. In contrast, the observed net continental rotation rate of 0.07 &#8226; &#177; 0.04 &#8226; My -1 between 200 Ma and 170 Ma can be fully explained by relative motion between the lithosphere and underlying mantle and is therefore consistent with the lack of TPW during that earlier time interval.</p><p>Velocities of TPW driven by mantle convective flow are controlled by a variety of factors, including the viscous relaxation timescale of the lower mantle, elastic stresses in the lithosphere, and the nature (geometry, magnitude) of the forcing, and accounting for these factors suggests the possibility of TPW of up to 2-3 &#8226; My -1 on the modern Earth (e.g., <ref type="bibr">Tsai and Stevenson, 2007;</ref><ref type="bibr">Chan et al., 2011)</ref>. Ongoing TPW in the present-day, driven by a combination of the ongoing effects of the last ice age and modern melting of ice sheets and glaciers proceeds at a rate of &#8764;1 &#8226; My -1 <ref type="bibr">(Mitrovica et al., 2015)</ref> but net displacements of the pole driven by these processes are small <ref type="bibr">(Chan et al., 2015)</ref>. Based on comparisons of the observed rotation rate with these expected rates of TPW and relative lithosphere-mantle motion, we conclude that the Late Jurassic monster shift was an episode of TPW associated with mantle convection with minimal contamination from net rotation of the lithosphere relative to the mantle.</p><p>The Jurassic monster shift represents the most recent documented episode of TPW with amplitude greater than 20 &#8226; . Given the relatively reliable knowledge of Earth's surface geography and mantle conditions during the Jurassic compared to earlier proposed time intervals of TPW, the monster shift represents a favorable case study for understanding the mechanisms and consequences of TPW through time. Any plausible driving mechanism for the Jurassic monster shift must be able to explain the apparently sudden onset between &#8764;175 and 165 Ma when the rate of TPW changed from &#8764;0.07 &#8226; My -1 (see above) to at least 1.21 &#8226; My -1 . Theoretical studies show that TPW events of a similar maximum velocity and total duration may be caused by variations in the rate and geometry of subduction. Specifically, <ref type="bibr">Steinberger and Torsvik (2010)</ref> found that TPW velocities of &#8764;1.5 &#8226; My -1 may occur under a range of assumptions regarding changes in subduction rate as long as the difference between the maximum and intermediate principal moments of inertia falls to below &#8764;1/3 of the present value. In contrast, models employing a different set of subducted slab and lower mantle dome geometries suggested that rapid TPW with &gt;2 &#8226; My -1 velocity can occur even with large, modern Earth-like differences in the principal moments of inertia (Greff-Lefftz and <ref type="bibr">Besse, 2012</ref><ref type="bibr">Besse, , 2014))</ref>.</p><p>Regardless of these differences, existing numerical models suggest that a change in the rate of subduction, even along a single subduction zone, is potentially sufficient to induce TPW at the observed Late Jurassic rates, with a phase shift in time associated with the adjustment of the mantle flow field. Two major Late Jurassic Period continental docking events may have contributed to driving rapid TPW. First, the closure of the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean basin between China and Siberia would have led to the cessation of subduction along a &#8764;3000 km front <ref type="bibr">(Van der Voo et al., 2015)</ref>.</p><p>However, the resulting perturbation of a detached slab descending through the upper mantle is projected to cause a negative regional geoid anomaly, driving the site of the continental collision towards the spin axis <ref type="bibr">(Greff-Lefftz and Besse, 2014)</ref>. This predicted sense of motion is the opposite to that observed. However, if the detachment of the subducted slab occurred &#8764;10 My earlier in the western Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean and assuming a descent rate of &#8764;10 cm y -1 in the upper mantle <ref type="bibr">(Kravchinsky et al., 2002;</ref><ref type="bibr">Van der Voo et al., 2015)</ref>, the bulk of the subducted slab may have passed below 1200 km depth. This would have led to a positive geoid anomaly and rotation of Asia towards the equator during the Late Jurassic in agreement with paleomagnetic data.</p><p>It has been suggested that the suture of a ribbon continent composed of the Wrangelia and Stikinia terranes to the western margin of North America occurred during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous interval <ref type="bibr">(Hildebrand, 2013;</ref><ref type="bibr">Sigloch and Mihalynuk, 2013)</ref>. Unlike the cessation of subduction in the Mongol-Okhotsk Ocean, the descent of a detached slab in North America would have led to TPW rotation in the correct direction. However, such an event would likely have resulted in the cessation of one subduction zone to the east of the accreting ribbon continent and the initiation of subduction on the west side, the net change induced on the Earth's inertia tensor may be small.</p><p>Another potential driver for Jurassic TPW is the descent of accumulated slab material across the 660 km mantle discontinuity in an event known as a slab avalanche. At a global scale, slab avalanche has been hypothesized to cause intervals of continental growth <ref type="bibr">(Condie, 1998)</ref>. Meanwhile at the scale of a single plate boundary, such events may have led to the recent reorganization of plate boundaries <ref type="bibr">(Pysklywec et al., 2003)</ref>. A slab avalanche in the western North American margin, for example, could have transferred mass excess from the upper mantle into the lower mantle over the timescale of &lt;10 My and led to a net negative change in the regional geoid, driving motion towards the pole in agreement with the paleomagnetic data.</p><p>Another potential contribution to Late Jurassic TPW is upwelling mantle flow acting in concert with, or independent from, the evolving subduction dynamics. As an example of the latter, the plume that ultimately led to the eruption of the Paran&#225;-Etendeka large igneous province at &#8764;132 Ma may also have had a nonnegligible impact on the orientation of the rotation axis. However, the relative proximity (&#8764;20 &#8226; ) of this large igneous province to the inferred TPW axis may limit its ability to cause large amplitude rotation.</p><p>In summary, we find that, without quantitative models including mantle upwellings and realistic slab geometries and descent rates, no unique cause for the Late Jurassic monster shift can be identified, although the cessation of multiple subduction zones at locations favorable for driving TPW at approximately the same time suggests that these events may have played an important role. Because the cessation of subduction was a recurring process throughout the geological past, this possible cause of Late Jurassic TPW implies that the conditions necessary for driving large amplitude TPW existed throughout Earth history and motivates detailed study of early intervals of candidate TPW.</p></div>
<div xmlns="http://www.tei-c.org/ns/1.0"><head n="5.">Conclusions</head><p>Our paleomagnetic and geochronological sampling of the La Negra Formation of northern Chile has produced two new paleomagnetic poles for the Late Jurassic Period dated to 165.8 &#177; 1.8 Ma and 152.8 &#177; 0.8 Ma. The ages of these poles are well-suited to constrain the amplitude, duration, and, therefore, the rate of polar wander during the Late Jurassic "monster shift." Combined with other recent paleomagnetic results from igneous rock formations, we infer a peak net continental rotation rate of 1.46 &#8226; &#177; 0.65 &#8226; between 160 and 145 Ma and a mean rate of 1.21 &#8226; &#177; 0.35 &#8226; My -1 between 170 and 145 Ma, producing a net displacement of 25.3 &#8226; &#177; 7.3 &#8226; . This rate is statistically distinguishable from lower, background net continental rotation rates before and after the 165-145 Ma interval. The consistency of this rotation with contemporaneous paleolatitudinal drift of the Pacific Plate, combined with its high velocity, provide strong evidence for the occurrence of TPW during the Late Jurassic.</p><p>Given the relative abundance of high-quality paleomagnetic data, constraints on oceanic plate motion, and reliable paleogeographic reconstructions, the Late Jurassic TPW event represents the most robustly identified large amplitude TPW event to-date in the geologic record. The refined rate, timing, and geometry computed for the Late Jurassic event provide a basis for exploring the possible geodynamical drivers of TPW. Future quantitative modeling of subduction and upwelling processes using realistic plate and slab geometries may allow identification of a narrow set of drivers for TPW in the Late Jurassic.</p></div></body>
		</text>
</TEI>
