More Like this

1. New Pseudorandom Generators and Correlation Bounds Using Extractors

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ITCS.2025.68  

   Kumar, Vinayak M (January 2025, Schloss Dagstuhl – Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik)

   Meka, Raghu (Ed.)

   We establish new correlation bounds and pseudorandom generators for a collection of computation models. These models are all natural generalization of structured low-degree polynomials that we did not have correlation bounds for before. In particular: - We construct a PRG for width-2 poly(n)-length branching programs which read d bits at a time with seed length 2^O(√{log n}) ⋅ d²log²(1/ε). This comes quadratically close to optimal dependence in d and log(1/ε). Improving the dependence on n would imply nontrivial PRGs for log n-degree 𝔽₂-polynomials. The previous PRG by Bogdanov, Dvir, Verbin, and Yehudayoff had an exponentially worse dependence on d with seed length of O(dlog n + d2^dlog(1/ε)). - We provide the first nontrivial (and nearly optimal) correlation bounds and PRGs against size-n^Ω(log n) AC⁰ circuits with either n^{.99} SYM gates (computing an arbitrary symmetric function) or n^{.49} THR gates (computing an arbitrary linear threshold function). This is a generalization of sparse 𝔽₂-polynomials, which can be simulated by an AC⁰ circuit with one parity gate at the top. Previous work of Servedio and Tan only handled n^{.49} SYM gates or n^{.24} THR gates, and previous work of Lovett and Srinivasan only handled polynomial-size circuits. - We give exponentially small correlation bounds against degree-n^O(1) 𝔽₂-polynomials which are set-multilinear over some arbitrary partition of the input into n^{1-O(1)} parts (noting that at n parts, we recover all low degree polynomials). This vastly generalizes correlation bounds against degree-d polynomials which are set-multilinear over a fixed partition into d blocks, which were established by Bhrushundi, Harsha, Hatami, Kopparty, and Kumar. The common technique behind all of these results is to fortify a hard function with the right type of extractor to obtain stronger correlation bounds for more general models of computation. Although this technique has been used in previous work, they rely on the model simplifying drastically under random restrictions. We view our results as a proof of concept that such fortification can be done even for classes that do not enjoy such behavior. 

   more » « less
2. Log-Seed Pseudorandom Generators via Iterated Restrictions

   Doron, Dean; Hatami, Pooya; Hoza, William (July 2020, Leibniz international proceedings in informatics)

   Saraf, Shubhangi (Ed.)

   There are only a few known general approaches for constructing explicit pseudorandom generators (PRGs). The "iterated restrictions" approach, pioneered by Ajtai and Wigderson [Ajtai and Wigderson, 1989], has provided PRGs with seed length polylog n or even Õ(log n) for several restricted models of computation. Can this approach ever achieve the optimal seed length of O(log n)? In this work, we answer this question in the affirmative. Using the iterated restrictions approach, we construct an explicit PRG for read-once depth-2 AC⁰[⊕] formulas with seed length O(log n) + Õ(log(1/ε)). In particular, we achieve optimal seed length O(log n) with near-optimal error ε = exp(-Ω̃(log n)). Even for constant error, the best prior PRG for this model (which includes read-once CNFs and read-once 𝔽₂-polynomials) has seed length Θ(log n ⋅ (log log n)²) [Chin Ho Lee, 2019]. A key step in the analysis of our PRG is a tail bound for subset-wise symmetric polynomials, a generalization of elementary symmetric polynomials. Like elementary symmetric polynomials, subset-wise symmetric polynomials provide a way to organize the expansion of ∏_{i=1}^m (1 + y_i). Elementary symmetric polynomials simply organize the terms by degree, i.e., they keep track of the number of variables participating in each monomial. Subset-wise symmetric polynomials keep track of more data: for a fixed partition of [m], they keep track of the number of variables from each subset participating in each monomial. Our tail bound extends prior work by Gopalan and Yehudayoff [Gopalan and Yehudayoff, 2014] on elementary symmetric polynomials. 

   more » « less
3. On Sketching Approximations for Symmetric Boolean CSPs

   Boyland, Joanna; Hwang, Michael; Prasad, Tarun; Singer, Noah; Velusamy, Santhoshini (September 2022, Approximation, Randomization, and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques (APPROX/RANDOM 2022))

   Chakrabarti, Amit; Swamy, Chaitanya (Ed.)

   A Boolean maximum constraint satisfaction problem, Max-CSP(f), is specified by a predicate f:{-1,1}^k → {0,1}. An n-variable instance of Max-CSP(f) consists of a list of constraints, each of which applies f to k distinct literals drawn from the n variables. For k = 2, Chou, Golovnev, and Velusamy [Chou et al., 2020] obtained explicit ratios characterizing the √ n-space streaming approximability of every predicate. For k ≥ 3, Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, and Velusamy [Chou et al., 2022] proved a general dichotomy theorem for √ n-space sketching algorithms: For every f, there exists α(f) ∈ (0,1] such that for every ε > 0, Max-CSP(f) is (α(f)-ε)-approximable by an O(log n)-space linear sketching algorithm, but (α(f)+ε)-approximation sketching algorithms require Ω(√n) space. In this work, we give closed-form expressions for the sketching approximation ratios of multiple families of symmetric Boolean functions. Letting α'_k = 2^{-(k-1)} (1-k^{-2})^{(k-1)/2}, we show that for odd k ≥ 3, α(kAND) = α'_k, and for even k ≥ 2, α(kAND) = 2α'_{k+1}. Thus, for every k, kAND can be (2-o(1))2^{-k}-approximated by O(log n)-space sketching algorithms; we contrast this with a lower bound of Chou, Golovnev, Sudan, Velingker, and Velusamy [Chou et al., 2022] implying that streaming (2+ε)2^{-k}-approximations require Ω(n) space! We also resolve the ratio for the "at-least-(k-1)-1’s" function for all even k; the "exactly-(k+1)/2-1’s" function for odd k ∈ {3,…,51}; and fifteen other functions. We stress here that for general f, the dichotomy theorem in [Chou et al., 2022] only implies that α(f) can be computed to arbitrary precision in PSPACE, and thus closed-form expressions need not have existed a priori. Our analyses involve identifying and exploiting structural "saddle-point" properties of this dichotomy. Separately, for all threshold functions, we give optimal "bias-based" approximation algorithms generalizing [Chou et al., 2020] while simplifying [Chou et al., 2022]. Finally, we investigate the √ n-space streaming lower bounds in [Chou et al., 2022], and show that they are incomplete for 3AND, i.e., they fail to rule out (α(3AND})-ε)-approximations in o(√ n) space. 

   more » « less
4. Biasing Boolean Functions and Collective Coin-Flipping Protocols over Arbitrary Product Distributions

   Filmus, Y; Hambardzumyan, L; Hatami, H; Hatami, P; Zuckerman, D (July 2019, 46th International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP))

   The seminal result of Kahn, Kalai and Linial shows that a coalition of O(n/(log n)) players can bias the outcome of any Boolean function {0,1}^n -> {0,1} with respect to the uniform measure. We extend their result to arbitrary product measures on {0,1}^n, by combining their argument with a completely different argument that handles very biased input bits. We view this result as a step towards proving a conjecture of Friedgut, which states that Boolean functions on the continuous cube [0,1]^n (or, equivalently, on {1,...,n}^n) can be biased using coalitions of o(n) players. This is the first step taken in this direction since Friedgut proposed the conjecture in 2004. Russell, Saks and Zuckerman extended the result of Kahn, Kalai and Linial to multi-round protocols, showing that when the number of rounds is o(log^* n), a coalition of o(n) players can bias the outcome with respect to the uniform measure. We extend this result as well to arbitrary product measures on {0,1}^n. The argument of Russell et al. relies on the fact that a coalition of o(n) players can boost the expectation of any Boolean function from epsilon to 1-epsilon with respect to the uniform measure. This fails for general product distributions, as the example of the AND function with respect to mu_{1-1/n} shows. Instead, we use a novel boosting argument alongside a generalization of our first result to arbitrary finite ranges. 

   more » « less
5. A Faster Algorithm for Maximum Flow in Directed Planar Graphs with Vertex Capacities

   https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.ISAAC.2021.72  

   Enoch, Julian; Fox, Kyle; Mesica, Dor; Mozes, Shay (November 2021, 32nd International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation)

   Ahn, Hee-Kap; Sadakane, Kunihiko (Ed.)

   We give an O(k³ Δ n log n min(k, log² n) log²(nC))-time algorithm for computing maximum integer flows in planar graphs with integer arc and vertex capacities bounded by C, and k sources and sinks. This improves by a factor of max(k²,k log² n) over the fastest algorithm previously known for this problem [Wang, SODA 2019]. The speedup is obtained by two independent ideas. First we replace an iterative procedure of Wang that uses O(k) invocations of an O(k³ n log³ n)-time algorithm for maximum flow algorithm in a planar graph with k apices [Borradaile et al., FOCS 2012, SICOMP 2017], by an alternative procedure that only makes one invocation of the algorithm of Borradaile et al. Second, we show two alternatives for computing flows in the k-apex graphs that arise in our modification of Wang’s procedure faster than the algorithm of Borradaile et al. In doing so, we introduce and analyze a sequential implementation of the parallel highest-distance push-relabel algorithm of Goldberg and Tarjan [JACM 1988]. 

   more » « less