An official website of the United States government
Printing ultrathin graphene oxide nanofiltration membranes for water purification
We demonstrated for the first time that inkjet printing can be a low-cost, easy, fast, and scalable method for depositing ultrathin (7.5–60 nm) uniform graphene oxide (GO) nanofiltration membranes on polymeric supports for highly effective water purification. A large area (15 × 15 cm 2 ) GO nanofiltration membrane was printed successfully on a modified polyacrylonitrile (M-PAN) support. Water permeance and rejection of small organic molecules (<1 nm, charged and uncharged) of printed GO membranes can be adjusted by controlling the GO “ink” concentration and/or printing time. Compared with commercial polymeric nanofiltration membranes, printed GO membranes, after optimization, showed approximately one order of magnitude higher water permeance and much higher rejection (>95%) of small organic molecules. Printed GO membranes also showed excellent performance in removing pharmaceutical contaminants, with ∼95% rejection and <10% water permeance decline over extended-period permeation testing. We believe that inkjet printing could be an effective method for preparing ultrathin GO membranes for effective water nanofiltration purification.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1451887
- PAR ID:
- 10140637
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- J. Mater. Chem. A
- Volume:
- 5
- Issue:
- 39
- ISSN:
- 2050-7488
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 20860 to 20866
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
Membranes used for desalination still face challenges during operation. One of these challenges is the buildup of salt ions at the membrane surface. This is known as concentration polarization, and it has a negative effect on membrane water permeance and salt rejection. In an attempt to decrease concentration polarization, a line-and-groove nanopattern was applied to a nanofiltration (NF) membrane. Aqueous sodium sulfate (Na2SO4) solutions were used to test the rejection and permeance of both pristine and patterned membranes. It was found that the nanopatterns did not reduce but increased the concentration polarization at the membrane surface. Based on these studies, different pattern shapes and sizes should be investigated to gain a fundamental understanding of the influence of pattern size and shape on concentration polarization.more » « less
-
Polymeric membranes fabricated via the nonsolvent-induced phase separation process rely heavily on toxic aprotic organic solvents, like N-methyl-pyrrolidine (NMP) and dimethylformamide. We suggest that the “saloplastic” nature of polyelectrolyte complexes (PECs) makes them an excellent candidate for fabricating next-generation water purification membranes that use a more sustainable aqueous phase separation process. In this study, we investigate how the properties of PECs and their interactions with salt can form pore-containing membranes from the strong polyelectrolytes poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) and poly(diallyldimethylammonium chloride) (PDADMAC) in the presence of potassium bromide (KBr). How the single-phase polymer-rich (coacervate) dope solution and coagulation bath impacted the formation, morphology, and pure water permeance (PWP) of the membranes was systematically evaluated by using scanning electron microscopy and dead-end filtration tests. The impact of a salt annealing post-treatment process was also tested; these treated PEC membranes exhibited a PWP of 6.2 L m–2 h–1 bar–1 and a dye removal of 91.7% and 80.5% for methyl orange and methylene blue, respectively, which are on par with commercial poly(ether sulfone) nanofiltration membranes. For the first time, we have demonstrated the ability of the PEC membranes to repel Escherichia coli bacteria under static conditions. Our fundamental study of polyelectrolyte membrane pore-forming mechanisms and separation performance could help drive the future development of sustainable materials for membrane-based separations.more » « less
-
Graphene oxide/polymer composite water filtration membranes were developed via coalescence of graphene oxide (GO) stabilized Pickering emulsions around a porosity-generating polymer. Triptycene poly(ether ether sulfone)-CH2NH2:HCl polymer interacts with the GO at the water−oil interface, resulting in stable Pickering emulsions. When they are deposited and dried on polytetrafluoroethylene substrate, the emulsions fuse to form a continuous GO/polymer composite membrane. X-ray diffraction and scanning electron microscopy demonstrate that the intersheet spacing and thickness of the membranes increased with increasing polymer concentration, confirming the polymer as the spacer between the GO sheets. The water filtration capability of the composite membranes was tested by removing Rose Bengal from water, mimicking separations of weak black liquor waste. The composite membrane achieved 65% rejection and 2500 g m−2 h−1 bar−1. With high polymer and GO loading, composite membranes give superior rejection and permeance performance when compared with a GO membrane. This methodology for fabrication membranes via GO/polymer Pickering emulsions produces membranes with a homogeneous morphology and robust chemical separation strength.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Over the past decade, the trade of counterfeit goods has increased. This has been enabled by advancements in low-cost digital printing methods (e.g., inkjet and laserjet) that are an asset for counterfeit production methods. However, each printing method produces characteristic printed features that can be used to identify not only the printing method, but also, uniquely identify the specific make and model of printer. This knowledge can be used for determination of whether or not the analyzed item is counterfeit. During the first phase of this research, chemical and physical analyses were performed on printed documents and ink samples for two types of digital printing: inkjet and laserjet. The results showed that it is possible to identify the digital method used to print a document by its unique features. Physical analysis revealed that the laserjet prints have a higher image quality characterized by sharper feature edge quality, brighter image area, and a thicker ink layer (10 micron average thickness) than in inkjet documents. Chemical analysis showed that the inkjet and laserjet inks could easily be distinguished by identifying the various ink components. Ink jet inks included (among others) water, ethylene glycol while laserjet inks presented styrene, methacrylate, and sulfide compounds.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta06307e
