More Like this

1. Phenology-based classification of invasive annual grasses to the species level

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2021.112568  

   Weisberg, Peter J.; Dilts, Thomas E.; Greenberg, Jonathan A.; Johnson, Kerri N.; Pai, Henry; Sladek, Chris; Kratt, Christopher; Tyler, Scott W.; Ready, Alice (September 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment)
2. Mapping Temperate Forest Phenology Using Tower, UAV, and Ground-Based Sensors

   https://doi.org/10.3390/drones4030056  

   Atkins, Jeff W.; Stovall, Atticus E.; Yang, Xi (September 2020, Drones)

   null (Ed.)

   Phenology is a distinct marker of the impacts of climate change on ecosystems. Accordingly, monitoring the spatiotemporal patterns of vegetation phenology is important to understand the changing Earth system. A wide range of sensors have been used to monitor vegetation phenology, including digital cameras with different viewing geometries mounted on various types of platforms. Sensor perspective, view-angle, and resolution can potentially impact estimates of phenology. We compared three different methods of remotely sensing vegetation phenology—an unoccupied aerial vehicle (UAV)-based, downward-facing RGB camera, a below-canopy, upward-facing hemispherical camera with blue (B), green (G), and near-infrared (NIR) bands, and a tower-based RGB PhenoCam, positioned at an oblique angle to the canopy—to estimate spring phenological transition towards canopy closure in a mixed-species temperate forest in central Virginia, USA. Our study had two objectives: (1) to compare the above- and below-canopy inference of canopy greenness (using green chromatic coordinate and normalized difference vegetation index) and canopy structural attributes (leaf area and gap fraction) by matching below-canopy hemispherical photos with high spatial resolution (0.03 m) UAV imagery, to find the appropriate spatial coverage and resolution for comparison; (2) to compare how UAV, ground-based, and tower-based imagery performed in estimating the timing of the spring phenological transition. We found that a spatial buffer of 20 m radius for UAV imagery is most closely comparable to below-canopy imagery in this system. Sensors and platforms agree within +/− 5 days of when canopy greenness stabilizes from the spring phenophase into the growing season. We show that pairing UAV imagery with tower-based observation platforms and plot-based observations for phenological studies (e.g., long-term monitoring, existing research networks, and permanent plots) has the potential to scale plot-based forest structural measures via UAV imagery, constrain uncertainty estimates around phenophases, and more robustly assess site heterogeneity. 

   more » « less
3. Predicting spring phenology in deciduous broadleaf forests: NEON phenology forecasting community challenge

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2023.109810  

   Wheeler, Kathryn I.; Dietze, Michael C.; LeBauer, David; Peters, Jody A.; Richardson, Andrew D.; Ross, Arun A.; Thomas, R Quinn; Zhu, Kai; Bhat, Uttam; Munch, Stephan; et al (February 2024, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology)
4. Climate change and phenology

   https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.764  

   Inouye, David W. (May 2022, WIREs Climate Change)
5. Modeling the variability in phenology-based growth dynamics of Spartina alterniflora with latitude

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecss.2023.108587  

   Jung, Yeajin (January 2024, Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science)