skip to main content


Title: Interaction with single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein localizes ribonuclease HI to DNA replication forks and facilitates R‐loop removal
Abstract

DNA replication complexes (replisomes) routinely encounter proteins and unusual nucleic acid structures that can impede their progress. Barriers can include transcription complexes and R‐loops that form when RNA hybridizes with complementary DNA templates behind RNA polymerases. Cells encode several RNA polymerase and R‐loop clearance mechanisms to limit replisome exposure to these potential obstructions. One such mechanism is hydrolysis of R‐loops by ribonuclease HI (RNase HI). Here, we examine the cellular role of the interaction betweenEscherichia coliRNase HI and the single‐stranded DNA‐binding protein (SSB) in this process. Interaction with SSB localizes RNase HI foci to DNA replication sites. Mutation ofrnhAto encode an RNase HI variant that cannot interact with SSB but that maintains enzymatic activity (rnhAK60E) eliminates RNase HI foci. The mutation also produces a media‐dependent slow‐growth phenotype and an activated DNA damage response in cells lacking Rep helicase, which is an enzyme that disrupts stalled transcription complexes. RNA polymerase variants that are thought to increase or decrease R‐loop accumulation enhance or suppress, respectively, the growth phenotype ofrnhAK60E rep::kanstrains. These results identify a cellular role for the RNase HI/SSB interaction in helping to clear R‐loops that block DNA replication.

 
more » « less
PAR ID:
10158932
Author(s) / Creator(s):
 ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Molecular Microbiology
Volume:
114
Issue:
3
ISSN:
0950-382X
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 495-509
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    RNA‐DNA hybrids form throughout the chromosome during normal growth and under stress conditions. When left unresolved, RNA‐DNA hybrids can slow replication fork progression, cause DNA breaks, and increase mutagenesis. To remove hybrids, all organisms use ribonuclease H (RNase H) to specifically degrade the RNA portion. Here we show that, in addition to chromosomally encoded RNase HII and RNase HIII,Bacillus subtilisNCIB 3610 encodes a previously uncharacterized RNase HI protein, RnhP, on the endogenous plasmid pBS32. Like other RNase HI enzymes, RnhP incises Okazaki fragments, ribopatches, and a complementary RNA‐DNA hybrid. We show that while chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is required for pBS32 hyper‐replication, RnhP compensates for the loss of RNase HIII activity on the chromosome. Consequently, loss of RnhP and RNase HIII impairs bacterial growth. We show that the decreased growth rate can be explained by laggard replication fork progression near the terminus region of the right replichore, resulting in SOS induction and inhibition of cell division. We conclude that all three functional RNase H enzymes are present inB. subtilisNCIB 3610 and that the plasmid‐encoded RNase HI contributes to chromosome stability, while the chromosomally encoded RNase HIII is important for chromosome stability and plasmid hyper‐replication.

     
    more » « less
  2. Abstract

    Accumulation of DNA–RNA hybrids in the form of R-loops can result in replication–transcription conflict that leads to the formation of DNA double strand breaks (DSBs). Using null mutants for the two Caenorhabditis elegans genes encoding for RNaseH1 and RNaseH2, we identify novel effects of R-loop accumulation in the germline. R-loop accumulation leads, as expected, to replication stress, followed by the formation of DSBs. A subset of these DSBs are irreparable. However, unlike irreparable DSBs generated in other systems, which trigger permanent cell cycle arrest, germline irreparable DSBs are propagated to oocytes. Despite DNA damage checkpoint activation in the stem cell niche, the signaling cannot be sustained and nuclei with irreparable DNA damage progress into meiosis. Moreover, unlike other forms of DNA damage that increase germline apoptosis, R-loop-generated DSBs remain undetected by the apoptotic checkpoint. This coincides with attenuation of ATM/ATR signaling in mid-to-late meiotic prophase I. These data altogether indicate that in the germline, DSBs that are generated by R-loops can lead to irreparable DSBs that evade cellular machineries designed for damage recognition. These studies implicate germline R-loops as an especially dangerous driver of germline mutagenesis.

     
    more » « less
  3. R-loops are abundant three-stranded nucleic-acid structures that formin cisduring transcription. Experimental evidence suggests that R-loop formation is affected by DNA sequence and topology. However, the exact manner by which these factors interact to determine R-loop susceptibility is unclear. To investigate this, we developed a statistical mechanical equilibrium model of R-loop formation in superhelical DNA. In this model, the energy involved in forming an R-loop includes four terms—junctional and base-pairing energies and energies associated with superhelicity and with the torsional winding of the displaced DNA single strand around the RNA:DNA hybrid. This model shows that the significant energy barrier imposed by the formation of junctions can be overcome in two ways. First, base-pairing energy can favor RNA:DNA over DNA:DNA duplexes in favorable sequences. Second, R-loops, by absorbing negative superhelicity, partially or fully relax the rest of the DNA domain, thereby returning it to a lower energy state. In vitro transcription assays confirmed that R-loops cause plasmid relaxation and that negative superhelicity is required for R-loops to form, even in a favorable region. Single-molecule R-loop footprinting following in vitro transcription showed a strong agreement between theoretical predictions and experimental mapping of stable R-loop positions and further revealed the impact of DNA topology on the R-loop distribution landscape. Our results clarify the interplay between base sequence and DNA superhelicity in controlling R-loop stability. They also reveal R-loops as powerful and reversible topology sinks that cells may use to nonenzymatically relieve superhelical stress during transcription.

     
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Ribonuclease (RNase) H2 is a key enzyme for the removal of RNA found in DNA-RNA hybrids, playing a fundamental role in biological processes such as DNA replication, telomere maintenance, and DNA damage repair. RNase H2 is a trimer composed of three subunits, RNASEH2A being the catalytic subunit. RNASEH2A expression levels have been shown to be upregulated in transformed and cancer cells. In this study, we used a bioinformatics approach to identify RNASEH2A co-expressed genes in different human tissues to underscore biological processes associated with RNASEH2A expression. Our analysis shows functional networks for RNASEH2A involvement such as DNA replication and DNA damage response and a novel putative functional network of cell cycle regulation. Further bioinformatics investigation showed increased gene expression in different types of actively cycling cells and tissues, particularly in several cancers, supporting a biological role for RNASEH2A but not for the other two subunits of RNase H2 in cell proliferation. Mass spectrometry analysis of RNASEH2A-bound proteins identified players functioning in cell cycle regulation. Additional bioinformatic analysis showed that RNASEH2A correlates with cancer progression and cell cycle related genes in Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Pan Cancer datasets and supported our mass spectrometry findings. 
    more » « less
  5. Abstract

    Single-stranded DNA binding proteins (SSBs) avidly bind ssDNA and yet enzymes that need to act during DNA replication and repair are not generally impeded by SSB, and are often stimulated by SSB. Here, the effects of Escherichia coli SSB on the activities of the DNA polymerase processivity clamp loader were investigated. SSB enhances binding of the clamp loader to DNA by increasing the lifetime on DNA. Clamp loading was measured on DNA substrates that differed in length of ssDNA overhangs to permit SSB binding in different binding modes. Even though SSB binds DNA adjacent to single-stranded/double-stranded DNA junctions where clamps are loaded, the rate of clamp loading on DNA was not affected by SSB on any of the DNA substrates. Direct measurements of the relative timing of DNA-SSB remodeling and enzyme–DNA binding showed that the clamp loader rapidly remodels SSB on DNA such that SSB has little effect on DNA binding rates. However, when SSB was mutated to reduce protein–protein interactions with the clamp loader, clamp loading was inhibited by impeding binding of the clamp loader to DNA. Thus, protein–protein interactions between the clamp loader and SSB facilitate rapid DNA-SSB remodeling to allow rapid clamp loader-DNA binding and clamp loading.

     
    more » « less