Title: Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments
Organisms switch their genes on and off to adapt to changing environments. This takes place thanks to complex networks of regulators that control which genes are actively ‘read’ by the cell to create the RNA molecules that are needed at the time. Piecing together these networks is key to fully understand the inner workings of living organisms, and how to potentially modify or artificially create them. Single-cell RNA sequencing is a powerful new tool that can measure which genes are turned on (or ‘expressed’) in an individual cell. Datasets with millions of gene expression profiles for individual cells now exist for organisms such as mice or humans. Yet, it is difficult to use these data to reconstruct networks of regulators; this is partly because scientists are not sure if the computational methods normally used to build these networks also work for single-cell RNA sequencing data. One way to check if this is the case is to use the methods on single-cell datasets from organisms where the networks of regulators are already known, and check whether the computational tools help to reach the same conclusion. Unfortunately, the regulatory networks in the organisms for which scientists have a lot of single-cell RNA sequencing data are still poorly known. There are living beings in which the networks are well characterised – such as yeast – but it has been difficult to do single-cell sequencing in them at the scale seen in other organisms. Jackson, Castro et al. first adapted a system for single-cell sequencing so that it would work in yeast. This generated a gene expression dataset of over 40,000 yeast cells. They then used a computational method (called the Inferelator) on these data to construct networks of regulators, and the results showed that the method performed well. This allowed Jackson, Castro et al. to start mapping how different networks connect, for example those that control the response to the environment and cell division. This is one of the benefits of single-cell RNA methods: cell division for example is not a process that can be examined at the level of a population, since the cells may all be at different life stages. In the future, the dataset will also be useful to scientists to benchmark a variety of single cell computational tools. more »« less
Maseda, Floyd; Cang, Zixuan; Nie, Qing(
, Frontiers in Genetics)
null
(Ed.)
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) data provides unprecedented information on cell fate decisions; however, the spatial arrangement of cells is often lost. Several recent computational methods have been developed to impute spatial information onto a scRNA-seq dataset through analyzing known spatial expression patterns of a small subset of genes known as a reference atlas. However, there is a lack of comprehensive analysis of the accuracy, precision, and robustness of the mappings, along with the generalizability of these methods, which are often designed for specific systems. We present a system-adaptive deep learning-based method (DEEPsc) to impute spatial information onto a scRNA-seq dataset from a given spatial reference atlas. By introducing a comprehensive set of metrics that evaluate the spatial mapping methods, we compare DEEPsc with four existing methods on four biological systems. We find that while DEEPsc has comparable accuracy to other methods, an improved balance between precision and robustness is achieved. DEEPsc provides a data-adaptive tool to connect scRNA-seq datasets and spatial imaging datasets to analyze cell fate decisions. Our implementation with a uniform API can serve as a portal with access to all the methods investigated in this work for spatial exploration of cell fate decisions in scRNA-seq data. All methods evaluated in this work are implemented as an open-source software with a uniform interface.
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-Seq) is a recent technology that allows for the measurement of the expression of all genes in each individual cell contained in a sample. Information at the single-cell level has been shown to be extremely useful in many areas. However, performing single-cell experiments is expensive. Although cellular deconvolution cannot provide the same comprehensive information as single-cell experiments, it can extract cell-type information from bulk RNA data, and therefore it allows researchers to conduct studies at cell-type resolution from existing bulk datasets. For these reasons, a great effort has been made to develop such methods for cellular deconvolution. The large number of methods available, the requirement of coding skills, inadequate documentation, and lack of performance assessment all make it extremely difficult for life scientists to choose a suitable method for their experiment. This paper aims to fill this gap by providing a comprehensive review of 53 deconvolution methods regarding their methodology, applications, performance, and outstanding challenges. More importantly, the article presents a benchmarking of all these 53 methods using 283 cell types from 30 tissues of 63 individuals. We also provide an R package named DeconBenchmark that allows readers to execute and benchmark the reviewed methods (https://github.com/tinnlab/DeconBenchmark).
Skok Gibbs, Claudia; Jackson, Christopher A.; Saldi, Giuseppe-Antonio; Tjärnberg, Andreas; Shah, Aashna; Watters, Aaron; De Veaux, Nicholas; Tchourine, Konstantine; Yi, Ren; Hamamsy, Tymor; et al(
, Bioinformatics)
AbstractMotivation
Gene regulatory networks define regulatory relationships between transcription factors and target genes within a biological system, and reconstructing them is essential for understanding cellular growth and function. Methods for inferring and reconstructing networks from genomics data have evolved rapidly over the last decade in response to advances in sequencing technology and machine learning. The scale of data collection has increased dramatically; the largest genome-wide gene expression datasets have grown from thousands of measurements to millions of single cells, and new technologies are on the horizon to increase to tens of millions of cells and above.
Results
In this work, we present the Inferelator 3.0, which has been significantly updated to integrate data from distinct cell types to learn context-specific regulatory networks and aggregate them into a shared regulatory network, while retaining the functionality of the previous versions. The Inferelator is able to integrate the largest single-cell datasets and learn cell-type-specific gene regulatory networks. Compared to other network inference methods, the Inferelator learns new and informative Saccharomyces cerevisiae networks from single-cell gene expression data, measured by recovery of a known gold standard. We demonstrate its scaling capabilities by learning networks for multiple distinct neuronal and glial cell types in the developing Mus musculus brain at E18 from a large (1.3 million) single-cell gene expression dataset with paired single-cell chromatin accessibility data.
Availability and implementation
The inferelator software is available on GitHub (https://github.com/flatironinstitute/inferelator) under the MIT license and has been released as python packages with associated documentation (https://inferelator.readthedocs.io/).
Supplementary information
Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
INTRODUCTION Neurons are by far the most diverse of all cell types in animals, to the extent that “cell types” in mammalian brains are still mostly heterogeneous groups, and there is no consensus definition of the term. The Drosophila optic lobes, with approximately 200 well-defined cell types, provides a tractable system with which to address the genetic basis of neuronal type diversity. We previously characterized the distinct developmental gene expression program of each of these types using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), with one-to-one correspondence to the known morphological types. RATIONALE The identity of fly neurons is determined by temporal and spatial patterning mechanisms in stem cell progenitors, but it remained unclear how these cell fate decisions are implemented and maintained in postmitotic neurons. It was proposed in Caenorhabditis elegans that unique combinations of terminal selector transcription factors (TFs) that are continuously expressed in each neuron control nearly all of its type-specific gene expression. This model implies that it should be possible to engineer predictable and complete switches of identity between different neurons just by modifying these sustained TFs. We aimed to test this prediction in the Drosophila visual system. RESULTS Here, we used our developmental scRNA-seq atlases to identify the potential terminal selector genes in all optic lobe neurons. We found unique combinations of, on average, 10 differentially expressed and stably maintained (across all stages of development) TFs in each neuron. Through genetic gain- and loss-of-function experiments in postmitotic neurons, we showed that modifications of these selector codes are sufficient to induce predictable switches of identity between various cell types. Combinations of terminal selectors jointly control both developmental (e.g., morphology) and functional (e.g., neurotransmitters and their receptors) features of neurons. The closely related Transmedullary 1 (Tm1), Tm2, Tm4, and Tm6 neurons (see the figure) share a similar code of terminal selectors, but can be distinguished from each other by three TFs that are continuously and specifically expressed in one of these cell types: Drgx in Tm1, Pdm3 in Tm2, and SoxN in Tm6. We showed that the removal of each of these selectors in these cell types reprograms them to the default Tm4 fate. We validated these conversions using both morphological features and molecular markers. In addition, we performed scRNA-seq to show that ectopic expression of pdm3 in Tm4 and Tm6 neurons converts them to neurons with transcriptomes that are nearly indistinguishable from that of wild-type Tm2 neurons. We also show that Drgx expression in Tm1 neurons is regulated by Klumpfuss, a TF expressed in stem cells that instructs this fate in progenitors, establishing a link between the regulatory programs that specify neuronal fates and those that implement them. We identified an intronic enhancer in the Drgx locus whose chromatin is specifically accessible in Tm1 neurons and in which Klu motifs are enriched. Genomic deletion of this region knocked down Drgx expression specifically in Tm1 neurons, leaving it intact in the other cell types that normally express it. We further validated this concept by demonstrating that ectopic expression of Vsx (visual system homeobox) genes in Mi15 neurons not only converts them morphologically to Dm2 neurons, but also leads to the loss of their aminergic identity. Our results suggest that selector combinations can be further sculpted by receptor tyrosine kinase signaling after neurogenesis, providing a potential mechanism for postmitotic plasticity of neuronal fates. Finally, we combined our transcriptomic datasets with previously generated chromatin accessibility datasets to understand the mechanisms that control brain wiring downstream of terminal selectors. We built predictive computational models of gene regulatory networks using the Inferelator framework. Experimental validations of these networks revealed how selectors interact with ecdysone-responsive TFs to activate a large and specific repertoire of cell surface proteins and other effectors in each neuron at the onset of synapse formation. We showed that these network models can be used to identify downstream effectors that mediate specific cellular decisions during circuit formation. For instance, reduced levels of cut expression in Tm2 neurons, because of its negative regulation by pdm3 , controls the synaptic layer targeting of their axons. Knockdown of cut in Tm1 neurons is sufficient to redirect their axons to the Tm2 layer in the lobula neuropil without affecting other morphological features. CONCLUSION Our results support a model in which neuronal type identity is primarily determined by a relatively simple code of continuously expressed terminal selector TFs in each cell type throughout development. Our results provide a unified framework of how specific fates are initiated and maintained in postmitotic neurons and open new avenues to understanding synaptic specificity through gene regulatory networks. The conservation of this regulatory logic in both C. elegans and Drosophila makes it likely that the terminal selector concept will also be useful in understanding and manipulating the neuronal diversity of mammalian brains. Terminal selectors enable predictive cell fate reprogramming. Tm1, Tm2, Tm4, and Tm6 neurons of the Drosophila visual system share a core set of TFs continuously expressed by each cell type (simplified). The default Tm4 fate is overridden by the expression of a single additional terminal selector to generate Tm1 ( Drgx ), Tm2 ( pdm3 ), or Tm6 ( SoxN ) fates.
Jackson, Christopher A, Castro, Dayanne M, Saldi, Giuseppe-Antonio, Bonneau, Richard, and Gresham, David. Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments. Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10164116. eLife 9. Web. doi:10.7554/eLife.51254.
Jackson, Christopher A, Castro, Dayanne M, Saldi, Giuseppe-Antonio, Bonneau, Richard, & Gresham, David. Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments. eLife, 9 (). Retrieved from https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10164116. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51254
Jackson, Christopher A, Castro, Dayanne M, Saldi, Giuseppe-Antonio, Bonneau, Richard, and Gresham, David.
"Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments". eLife 9 (). Country unknown/Code not available. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.51254.https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10164116.
@article{osti_10164116,
place = {Country unknown/Code not available},
title = {Gene regulatory network reconstruction using single-cell RNA sequencing of barcoded genotypes in diverse environments},
url = {https://par.nsf.gov/biblio/10164116},
DOI = {10.7554/eLife.51254},
abstractNote = {Organisms switch their genes on and off to adapt to changing environments. This takes place thanks to complex networks of regulators that control which genes are actively ‘read’ by the cell to create the RNA molecules that are needed at the time. Piecing together these networks is key to fully understand the inner workings of living organisms, and how to potentially modify or artificially create them. Single-cell RNA sequencing is a powerful new tool that can measure which genes are turned on (or ‘expressed’) in an individual cell. Datasets with millions of gene expression profiles for individual cells now exist for organisms such as mice or humans. Yet, it is difficult to use these data to reconstruct networks of regulators; this is partly because scientists are not sure if the computational methods normally used to build these networks also work for single-cell RNA sequencing data. One way to check if this is the case is to use the methods on single-cell datasets from organisms where the networks of regulators are already known, and check whether the computational tools help to reach the same conclusion. Unfortunately, the regulatory networks in the organisms for which scientists have a lot of single-cell RNA sequencing data are still poorly known. There are living beings in which the networks are well characterised – such as yeast – but it has been difficult to do single-cell sequencing in them at the scale seen in other organisms. Jackson, Castro et al. first adapted a system for single-cell sequencing so that it would work in yeast. This generated a gene expression dataset of over 40,000 yeast cells. They then used a computational method (called the Inferelator) on these data to construct networks of regulators, and the results showed that the method performed well. This allowed Jackson, Castro et al. to start mapping how different networks connect, for example those that control the response to the environment and cell division. This is one of the benefits of single-cell RNA methods: cell division for example is not a process that can be examined at the level of a population, since the cells may all be at different life stages. In the future, the dataset will also be useful to scientists to benchmark a variety of single cell computational tools.},
journal = {eLife},
volume = {9},
author = {Jackson, Christopher A and Castro, Dayanne M and Saldi, Giuseppe-Antonio and Bonneau, Richard and Gresham, David},
}
Warning: Leaving National Science Foundation Website
You are now leaving the National Science Foundation website to go to a non-government website.
Website:
NSF takes no responsibility for and exercises no control over the views expressed or the accuracy of
the information contained on this site. Also be aware that NSF's privacy policy does not apply to this site.
