skip to main content

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Empirical Performance of Tree-Based Inference of Phylogenetic Networks
Phylogenetic networks extend the phylogenetic tree structure and allow for modeling vertical and horizontal evolution in a single framework. Statistical inference of phylogenetic networks is prohibitive and currently limited to small networks. An approach that could significantly improve phylogenetic network space exploration is based on first inferring an evolutionary tree of the species under consideration, and then augmenting the tree into a network by adding a set of "horizontal" edges to better fit the data. In this paper, we study the performance of such an approach on networks generated under a birth-hybridization model and explore its feasibility as an alternative to approaches that search the phylogenetic network space directly (without relying on a fixed underlying tree). We find that the concatenation method does poorly at obtaining a "backbone" tree that could be augmented into the correct network, whereas the popular species tree inference method ASTRAL does significantly better at such a task. We then evaluated the tree-to-network augmentation phase under the minimizing deep coalescence and pseudo-likelihood criteria. We find that even though this is a much faster approach than the direct search of the network space, the accuracy is much poorer, even when the backbone tree is a good starting tree. Our results show that tree-based inference of phylogenetic networks could yield very poor results. As exploration of the network space directly in search of maximum likelihood estimates or a representative sample of the posterior is very expensive, significant improvements to the computational complexity of phylogenetic network inference are imperative if analyses of large data sets are to be performed. We show that a recently developed divide-and-conquer approach significantly outperforms tree-based inference in terms of accuracy, albeit still at a higher computational cost.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1800723
PAR ID:
10166888
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Leibniz international proceedings in informatics
ISSN:
1868-8969
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ( , IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics)
    null (Ed.)
    We present PALLAS, a practical method for gene regulatory network (GRN) inference from time series data, which employs penalized maximum likelihood and particle swarms for optimization. PALLAS is based on the Partially-Observable Boolean Dynamical System (POBDS) model and thus does not require ad-hoc binarization of the data. The penalty in the likelihood is a LASSO regularization term, which encourages the resulting network to be sparse. PALLAS is able to scale to networks of realistic size under no prior knowledge, by virtue of a novel continuous-discrete Fish School Search particle swarm algorithm for efficient simultaneous maximization of the penalized likelihood over the discrete space of networks and the continuous space of observational parameters. The performance of PALLAS is demonstrated by a comprehensive set of experiments using synthetic data generated from real and artificial networks, as well as real time series microarray and RNA-seq data, where it is compared to several other well-known methods for gene regulatory network inference. The results show that PALLAS can infer GRNs more accurately than other methods, while being capable of working directly on gene expression data, without need of ad-hoc binarization. PALLAS is a fully-fledged program, written in python, and available on GitHub (https://github.com/yukuntan92/PALLAS). 
    more » « less
  2. ; ( , Bioinformatics)
    Abstract Motivation

    Phylogenetic networks represent reticulate evolutionary histories. Statistical methods for their inference under the multispecies coalescent have recently been developed. A particularly powerful approach uses data that consist of bi-allelic markers (e.g. single nucleotide polymorphism data) and allows for exact likelihood computations of phylogenetic networks while numerically integrating over all possible gene trees per marker. While the approach has good accuracy in terms of estimating the network and its parameters, likelihood computations remain a major computational bottleneck and limit the method’s applicability.

     Results

    In this article, we first demonstrate why likelihood computations of networks take orders of magnitude more time when compared to trees. We then propose an approach for inference of phylogenetic networks based on pseudo-likelihood using bi-allelic markers. We demonstrate the scalability and accuracy of phylogenetic network inference via pseudo-likelihood computations on simulated data. Furthermore, we demonstrate aspects of robustness of the method to violations in the underlying assumptions of the employed statistical model. Finally, we demonstrate the application of the method to biological data. The proposed method allows for analyzing larger datasets in terms of the numbers of taxa and reticulation events. While pseudo-likelihood had been proposed before for data consisting of gene trees, the work here uses sequence data directly, offering several advantages as we discuss.

     Availability and implementation

    The methods have been implemented in PhyloNet (http://bioinfocs.rice.edu/phylonet).

     
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ; ; ( , Systematic Biology)
    Abstract

    Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo explores tree space slowly, in part because it frequently returns to the same tree topology. An alternative strategy would be to explore tree space systematically, and never return to the same topology. In this article, we present an efficient parallelized method to map out the high likelihood set of phylogenetic tree topologies via systematic search, which we show to be a good approximation of the high posterior set of tree topologies on the data sets analyzed. Here, “likelihood” of a topology refers to the tree likelihood for the corresponding tree with optimized branch lengths. We call this method “phylogenetic topographer” (PT). The PT strategy is very simple: starting in a number of local topology maxima (obtained by hill-climbing from random starting points), explore out using local topology rearrangements, only continuing through topologies that are better than some likelihood threshold below the best observed topology. We show that the normalized topology likelihoods are a useful proxy for the Bayesian posterior probability of those topologies. By using a nonblocking hash table keyed on unique representations of tree topologies, we avoid visiting topologies more than once across all concurrent threads exploring tree space. We demonstrate that PT can be used directly to approximate a Bayesian consensus tree topology. When combined with an accurate means of evaluating per-topology marginal likelihoods, PT gives an alternative procedure for obtaining Bayesian posterior distributions on phylogenetic tree topologies.

     
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ( , Genome Research)

    The reconstruction of phylogenetic networks is an important but challenging problem in phylogenetics and genome evolution, as the space of phylogenetic networks is vast and cannot be sampled well. One approach to the problem is to solve the minimum phylogenetic network problem, in which phylogenetic trees are first inferred, and then the smallest phylogenetic network that displays all the trees is computed. The approach takes advantage of the fact that the theory of phylogenetic trees is mature, and there are excellent tools available for inferring phylogenetic trees from a large number of biomolecular sequences. A tree–child network is a phylogenetic network satisfying the condition that every nonleaf node has at least one child that is of indegree one. Here, we develop a new method that infers the minimum tree–child network by aligning lineage taxon strings in the phylogenetic trees. This algorithmic innovation enables us to get around the limitations of the existing programs for phylogenetic network inference. Our new program, named ALTS, is fast enough to infer a tree–child network with a large number of reticulations for a set of up to 50 phylogenetic trees with 50 taxa that have only trivial common clusters in about a quarter of an hour on average.

     
    more » « less
  5. ( , Bioinformatics)
    Abstract Motivation Population admixture is an important subject in population genetics. Inferring population demographic history with admixture under the so-called admixture network model from population genetic data is an established problem in genetics. Existing admixture network inference approaches work with single genetic polymorphisms. While these methods are usually very fast, they do not fully utilize the information [e.g. linkage disequilibrium (LD)] contained in population genetic data. Results In this article, we develop a new admixture network inference method called GTmix. Different from existing methods, GTmix works with local gene genealogies that can be inferred from population haplotypes. Local gene genealogies represent the evolutionary history of sampled haplotypes and contain the LD information. GTmix performs coalescent-based maximum likelihood inference of admixture networks with inferred local genealogies based on the well-known multispecies coalescent (MSC) model. GTmix utilizes various techniques to speed up the likelihood computation on the MSC model and the optimal network search. Our simulations show that GTmix can infer more accurate admixture networks with much smaller data than existing methods, even when these existing methods are given much larger data. GTmix is reasonably efficient and can analyze population genetic datasets of current interests. Availability and implementation The program GTmix is available for download at: https://github.com/yufengwudcs/GTmix. Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email