skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Attention:The NSF Public Access Repository (NSF-PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 7:00 AM ET to 7:30 AM ET on Friday, April 24 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.


Title: Muscle Force Prediction in OpenSim Using Skeleton Motion Optimization Results As Input Data
This paper describes an integrated approach to predict human leg and spine muscle forces during lifting by integration of a predictive skeletal model with OpenSim. The two-dimensional (2D) skeletal lifting motion is first predicted by using an inverse dynamics optimization method. Then, the prediction outputs, including joint angle profiles, ground reaction forces, and center of pressure, are incorporated in OpenSim biomechanics software to analyze muscle forces for lifting. Therefore, the integrated approach has predictive capability on musculoskeletal level. By using this method, we can predict and analyze muscles forces for heavy weight lifting motion which is difficult to simulate directly using a 3D musculoskeletal model.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1849279 1700865
PAR ID:
10167301
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
ASME 2019 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. In this study, a 3D asymmetric lifting motion is predicted by using a hybrid predictive model to prevent potential musculoskeletal lower back injuries for asymmetric lifting tasks. The hybrid model has two modules: a skeletal module and an OpenSim musculoskeletal module. The skeletal module consists of a dynamic joint strength based 40 degrees of freedom spatial skeletal model. The skeletal module can predict the lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of pressure (COP) trajectory using an inverse dynamics-based motion optimization method. The musculoskeletal module consists of a 324-muscle-actuated full-body lumbar spine model. Based on the predicted kinematics, GRFs and COP data from the skeletal module, the musculoskeletal module estimates muscle activations using static optimization and joint reaction forces through the joint reaction analysis tool in OpenSim. The predicted asymmetric motion and GRFs are validated with experimental data. Muscle activation results between the simulated and experimental EMG are also compared to validate the model. Finally, the shear and compression spine loads are compared to NIOSH recommended limits. The differences between asymmetric and symmetric liftings are also compared. 
    more » « less
  2. Abstract In this study, a hybrid predictive model is used to predict 3D asymmetric lifting motion and assess potential musculoskeletal lower back injuries for asymmetric lifting tasks. The hybrid model has two modules: a skeletal module and an OpenSim musculoskeletal module. The skeletal module consists of a dynamic joint strength based 40 degrees of freedom spatial skeletal model. The skeletal module can predict the lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and center of pressure (COP) trajectory using an inverse dynamics based optimization method. The equations of motion are built by recursive Lagrangian dynamics. The musculoskeletal module consists of a 324-muscle-actuated full-body lumbar spine model. Based on the generated kinematics, GRFs and COP data from the skeletal module, the musculoskeletal module estimates muscle activations using static optimization and joint reaction forces through the joint reaction analysis tool. Muscle activation results between simulated and experimental EMG are compared to validate the model. Finally, potential lower back injuries are evaluated for a specific-weight asymmetric lifting task. The shear and compression spine loads are compared to NIOSH recommended limits. At the beginning of the dynamic lifting process, the simulated compressive spine load beyond the NIOSH action limit but less than the permissible limit. This is due to the fatigue factors considered in NIOSH lifting equation. 
    more » « less
  3. In this study, a novel human-in-the-loop design method using a genetic algorithm (GA) is presented to design a low-cost and easy-to-use four-bar linkage medical device for upper limb muscle rehabilitation. The four-bar linkage can generate a variety of coupler point trajectories by using different link lengths. For this medical device, patients grab the coupler point handle and rotate the arm along the designed coupler point trajectory to exercise upper limb muscles. The design procedures include three basic steps: First, for a set of link lengths, a complete coupler point trajectory is generated from four-bar linkage kinematics; second, optimization-based motion prediction is utilized to predict arm motion (joint angle profiles) subjected to hand grasping and joint angle limit constraints; third, the predicted joint angles and given hand forces are imported into an OpenSim musculoskeletal arm model to calculate the muscle forces and activations by using the OpenSim static optimization. In the GA optimization formulation, the design variables are the four-bar link lengths. The objective function is to maximize a specific muscle’s exertion for a complete arm rotation. Finally, different four-bar configurations are designed for different muscle strength exercises. The proposed human-in-the-loop design approach successfully integrates GA with linkage kinematics, arm motion prediction, and OpenSim static optimization for four-bar linkage design for upper limb muscle strength rehabilitation. 
    more » « less
  4. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Symmetric lifting is a common manual material handling strategy in daily life and is the main cause of low back pain. In the literature, symmetric lifting is mainly simulated by using two-dimensional (2D) models because of their simplicity and low computational cost. In practice, however, symmetric lifting can generate asymmetric kinetics especially when the lifting weight is heavy and symmetric lifting based on 2D models misses this important asymmetric kinetics information. Therefore, three-dimensional (3D) models are necessary for symmetric lifting simulation to capture asymmetric kinetics. The purpose of this single-subject case study is to compare the optimization formulations and simulation results for symmetric lifting by using 2D and 3D human models and to identify their pros and cons. In this case study, a 10-degrees-of-freedom (DOFs) 2D skeletal model and a 40-DOFs 3D skeletal model are employed to predict the symmetric maximum weight lifting motion, respectively. The lifting problem is formulated as a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem to minimize the dynamic effort and maximize the box weight. An inverse dynamic optimization approach is used to determine the optimal lifting motion and the maximum lifting weight considering dynamic joint strength. Lab experiments are carried out to validate the predicted motions. The predicted lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and maximum box weight from the 2D and 3D human models for Subject #8 are compared with the experimental data. Recommendations are given. 
    more » « less
  5. null (Ed.)
    Abstract Lifting heavy weight is one of the main reasons for manual material handling related injuries which can be mitigated by determining the limiting lifting weight of a person. In this study, a 40 degrees of freedom (DOFs) spatial skeletal model was employed to predict the symmetric maximum weight lifting motion. The lifting problem was formulated as a multi-objective optimization (MOO) problem to minimize the dynamic effort and maximize the box weight. An inverse-dynamics-based optimization approach was used to determine the optimal lifting motion and the maximum lifting weight considering dynamic joint strength. The predicted lifting motion, ground reaction forces (GRFs), and maximum box weight were shown to match well with the experimental results. It was found that for the three-dimensional (3D) symmetric lifting the left and right GRFs were not same. 
    more » « less