More Like this

1. Understanding social–ecological systems using social media data

   https://doi.org/10.1038/s43017-022-00320-w  

   Manley, Kyle (August 2022, Nature Reviews Earth & Environment)
2. Social-ecological resilience and geomorphic systems

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.038  

   Chaffin, Brian C.; Scown, Murray (March 2018, Geomorphology)
3. Ecosystem size predicts social-ecological dynamics

   https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10961-240217  

   Kaemingk, Mark A.; Chizinski, Christopher J.; Allen, Craig R.; Pope, Kevin L. (January 2019, Ecology and Society)
4. Managing ecological disturbances: Learning and the structure of social-ecological networks

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.08.002  

   Baggio, J.A.; Hillis, V. (November 2018, Environmental Modelling & Software)
5. Social networks and transformative behaviours in a grassland social‐ecological system

   https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10695  

   Nesbitt, Holly K; Metcalf, Alexander L; Floyd, Theresa M; Uden, Daniel R; Chaffin, Brian C; Gulab, Sabrina; Banerjee, Simanti; Vallury, Sechindra; Hamlin, Samantha L; Metcalf, Elizabeth Covelli; et al (October 2024, People and Nature)

   Abstract Social connections among individuals are essential components of social‐ecological systems (SESs), enabling people to take actions to more effectively adapt or transform in response to widespread social‐ecological change. Although scholars have associated social connections and cognitions with adaptive capacity, measuring actors' social networks may further clarify pathways for bolstering resilience‐enhancing actions.We asked how social networks and socio‐cognitions, as components of adaptive capacity, and SES regime shift severity affect individual landscape management behaviours using a quantitative analysis of ego network survey data from livestock producers and landcover data on regime shift severity (i.e. juniper encroachment) in the North American Great Plains.Producers who experienced severe regime shifts or perceived high risks from such shifts were not more likely to engage in transformative behaviour like prescribed burning. Instead, we found that social network characteristics explained significant variance in transformative behaviours.Policy implications: Our results indicate that social networks enable behaviours that have the potential to transform SESs, suggesting possible leverage points for enabling capacity and coordination toward sustainability. Particularly where private lands dominate and cultural practices condition regime shifts, clarifying how social connections promote resilience may provide much needed insight to bolster adaptive capacities in the face of global change. Read the freePlain Language Summaryfor this article on the Journal blog. 

   more » « less