An official website of the United States government
In the realm of unaddressed ethnic disparities in the United States, the issue of venture capital funding is often overlooked. Despite their significant presence in the population, Hispanic and Black entrepreneurs receive only a fraction of venture capital investment, which is a stark contrast to their demographic representation. A staggering 77% of venture capital recipients are White, 9% women, and nearly 2% Latino, leaving just a minuscule 1% for African American entrepreneurs (remaining were Asians and Middle Easterners), regardless of their gender or educational qualifications [1]. Multiple sources claim an even higher population than 80% of White and approx. 1% Black [9, 10, 11, 12, 13]. This discrepancy is particularly evident in STEM and the burgeoning field of transdisciplinary startups like biotechnology, where interdisciplinary knowledge is increasingly crucial. Consequently, emerging entrepreneurs in these sectors frequently face obstacles in accessing adequate support, a challenge that persists into the 21st century amid fierce global competition for innovation leadership. Recognizing this trend, Congress authorized eligible agencies under the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011 to allocate 3% of their small business grant budget to support underserved groups [2]. Consequently, several other agencies began utilizing this fund to reach out to those communities. To maintain its position as a global leader in Research and Development (R&D), alongside the SBA the National Science Foundation (NSF) initiated the Innovative Postdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF) program. Designed to address the underrepresented researchers in STEM fields, IPERF offers these fellows invaluable experience within technology startups to bolster their professional development and give them valuable tools in the entrepreneurship area, as well as for the authors to create new knowledge about postdoctoral STEM entrepreneurship which might be reused at university levels in the future. The program aims to enrich diversity within the STEM high-tech startups and entrepreneurial spheres, thereby enhancing opportunities for marginalized groups. As interdisciplinary high-tech startups (nearly 70% of them) experience exponential growth, biotechnology companies within IPERF constitute nearly 40% of its participant companies. This paper presents part of the results, focusing on fellows post-IPERF time, i.e., longevity findings, and rapidly growing interdisciplinarity of the high-tech startups. A longitudinal study involving 60 fellows who completed the program over one to four years ago revealed that while the host companies hired 35% at the beginning, 25% still remained at various startup businesses after three years, and the majority (50%) transitioned into roles within industry labs. Through IPERF, highly educated yet primarily theoretical fellows gain hands-on experience in the intricacies of entrepreneurship, with the option to either continue with the current company or embark on their entrepreneurial ventures following the high-tech internship. This practical education not only benefits the fellows themselves but also contributes to the broader objective of diversifying startup leadership in the United States.
more »
« less
A policy mix experiment to promote start-up success: exploratory evaluation of the NSF Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR)/Industry University Cooperative Research Center (IUCRC) membership supplement
This paper investigates the outcomes of a policy experiment, the NSF SBIR/IUCRC Membership Supplement, designed to promote the success of small high-tech entrepreneurial ventures by providing subsidized memberships in university-based cooperative research centers (IUCRCs). Data collected via semi-structured interviews with representatives of 61 Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) firms indicated that SBIR firms who used the supplement to join an IUCRC reported multiple R&D benefits including research cost avoidance, research savings, and access to expensive equipment. A vast majority of SBIR firms also reported realizing or anticipated realizing commercial benefits (e.g., new investors, new products, and improvements to existing products). As suggested by social capital theory, SBIR firms reported that the policy mix experiment helped them make new connections with faculty and industry. Following our qualitative results, a structural equation model was applied to test the effect of social capital as an antecedent of SBIR firm R&D and commercialization outcomes. Results suggested that the SBIR firms who developed more social capital through interactions with faculty and industry members realized significantly more R&D and commercialization benefits. Further, commercialization benefits mediated the relationship between social capital and the SBIR firm’s perceived return on investment. Overall, this study demonstrates the feasibility of subjecting mixed policy interventions to evaluative scrutiny and provides evidence that such instruments can have substantive and positive effects on small high-tech entrepreneurial ventures. We discuss implications for social capital theory, policy mix initiatives and entrepreneurship policy.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1655104
- PAR ID:
- 10176048
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- The Journal of Technology Transfer
- ISSN:
- 0892-9912
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
When considering the many underserved communities and instances of ethnic injustice that require attention in the U.S., venture capital funding might not immediately come to mind. However, Hispanic and Black entrepreneurs receive only a minuscule portion of venture capital, which is drastically out of sync with their representation in the population. Despite differences in gender and education, 77% of venture fund recipients are White, while only 1% are African American [1]. The 2013 SBA Annual Report revealed that while there was some progress, only 15% of this funding went to women and underserved minority groups [2], despite these groups making up approximately 50% of the U.S. population. The private sector reflects a similar imbalance. According to a 2019 report by Diversity VC [1], a nonprofit promoting diversity in Venture Capital (VC), a comprehensive survey of around 10,000 founders who received venture capital revealed that only 9% were women, and just 1% were Black. This disparity is especially pronounced in the growing sectors of transdisciplinary startups—such as bioenergy, biotechnology, and nanomedical technologies—where cross-disciplinary expertise is becoming increasingly crucial. Entrepreneurs in these fields often face significant obstacles in securing adequate support, a problem that persists even as U.S. innovation contends with unprecedented global competition. This trend prompted Congress to allow eligible agencies to allocate 3% of their small business budgets to support underserved groups, as part of the SBIR/STTR Reauthorization Act of 2011. Consequently, several other agencies have begun using these funds to reach underserved communities. To ensure that the U.S. remains a world leader in R&D, besides SBA and a few other agencies, the National Science Foundation (NSF) launched the Innovative Postdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF) program. IPERF facilitates the professional development of Black, Hispanic, and female research fellows, typically underrepresented in STEM fields, by offering them invaluable experience within technology start-ups. The program’s goal is to enhance diversity in the high-tech start-up and entrepreneurial landscapes and improve opportunities for underserved groups. Meanwhile, interdisciplinary high-tech startups are growing exponentially, the biotechnology companies within IPERF make up nearly 40% of the IPERF companies. A longitudinal survey of 60 IPERF fellows who left the program between one and four years ago showed that 35% of them were hired by their host companies, still 25 % were working at those startups after three years. Most of the other fellows found jobs within the industry labs (30%) or other startup companies (10%).more » « less
-
Abstract Early-stage science-based ventures (SBVs) require a wide range of intellectual resources and practical know-how to successfully commercialize their technologies. Often SBV founders actively gain this knowledge through advisory relationships providing business and technology guidance. We explore the effects of both business and technology advisors in combination with the founder’s entrepreneurial and technology experience. We measure early-stage success in an SBV using application readiness, a novel concept that encompasses progress in both technology discovery and validation as well as market identification and application. Using hand-collected longitudinal data from 112 emerging science-based ventures associated with American universities, we find that business advisors have a positive impact on application readiness, while technology advisors delay it; and these effects are moderated by the founder’s experience. Remarkably, a small number of advisors can have the same impact as decades of experience. Our article unpacks underexplored mechanisms through which advisors—an often-used policy tool supporting entrepreneurship—are implemented in emerging science-based ventures and makes academic contributions to the literatures on technology commercialization, advisors and human capital.more » « less
-
In the current paper, we attempt to contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of science, technology and innovation (STI) outputs and outcomes through the application of a Scientific and Technical Human Capital (STHC) evaluation framework. We do this by describing a study that focuses on a type of STI initiative that appears ripe with potential to affect STHC impacts—Industry–University Cooperative Research Centers (IUCRCs). In doing so we summarize relevant theory related to the STHC framework and social capital formation more generally. We also define IUCRCs and highlight the program mechanisms that appear likely to impact the STHC outcomes. Finally, we narrow our focus to a relatively neglected research target of the STI evaluation—science and engineering (S&E) doctoral students. We compare social capital and other students’ outcomes by employing a rare quasi-experimental design with two training modalities: IUCRC and more traditional, non-center training. We show that our results demonstrate strong evidence for positive effects of IUCRC training on graduate S&E students’ outcomes. We also explain significant moderating effect of citizenship status on some of our results where international students, who account for 50% of this population, do not receive the same social capital outcomes as students with US citizenship or permanent resident status. In addition, we describe patterns in international students’ intentions to stay in the US and how they are affected by students’ training modality. Finally, we discuss the results and implications in the context of graduate training, STHC evaluation framework and STI and immigration policy.more » « less
-
CIEC panel (Ed.)Abstract: When starting small businesses, particularly in high-tech sectors like artificial intelligence (AI), digital twins, or the Internet of Things (IoT), women and underrepresented minority groups face additional hurdles in securing funding and investment. Not only is such a discrepancy in investment socially unjust, but it deprives the US of the advantages in innovation and global competition that could stem from the widening participation of the underrepresented population in innovative sectors. Although targeted support to women and underrepresented minority-owned businesses is being provided by the federal government and the private sector, more remains to be done to close the investment gap. The US Small Business Administration (SBA, 2013) provides more than $3.5 billion in funding to over 5,000 startups per year through its Small Business Innovation Research (SBIR) and Small Business Technology Transfer (STTR) programs. Moreover, the Small Business Act provides these programs with a mandate to target women and underrepresented minority groups. Despite this mandate from SBA, only 15% of those funds went to minority-owned companies (SBA, 2013). Funding opportunities from the private sector tell a similar story. Diversity VC, a non-profit partnership promoting diversity in Venture Capital, reported in 2019 that in a comprehensive survey (Azevedo, 2019) of around 10,000 founders receiving venture capital backing, only 9% were women and a mere 1% were Black. In order to i) accelerate innovation and increase participation of under-represented minorities in start-ups of “new industry”, and ii) to ensure US competitiveness in the global market, in 2010, the National Science Foundation (NSF) introduced the Small Business Postdoctoral Research Diversity Fellowship (SBPRDF) program and selected the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) to administer the program. In recognition of ASEE’s successful performance in meeting the objectives of the SBPRDF program, in 2019 NSF/IIP (Industrial Innovation and Partnerships) program leadership selected ASEE to administer the Innovative Postdoctoral Entrepreneurial Research Fellowship (IPERF) program. The overarching goal of the IPERF program is to emphasize and strengthen the entrepreneurial development of underrepresented Fellows. The IPERF program also aims to advance best practices in postdoctoral programs and impart cross-disciplinary expertise in the application of new technologies like AI and IoT in “new industries” based on bioengineering and biochemistry technologies.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-020-09794-6
