skip to main content
US FlagAn official website of the United States government
dot gov icon
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
https lock icon
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock ( lock ) or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.


Title: How Computers See Gender: An Evaluation of Gender Classification in Commercial Facial Analysis Services
Award ID(s):
1756028
PAR ID:
10179309
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
Volume:
3
Issue:
CSCW
ISSN:
2573-0142
Page Range / eLocation ID:
1 to 33
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract Previous research suggests that people encode gender starting in childhood. The present research asked whether gender diverse children (i.e., children whose gender identity or expression differs from that expected based on assigned sex) encode gender. Results showed that 3- to 5-year-old gender diverse participants (N = 71), siblings of gender diverse children (N = 52), and gender conforming controls (N = 69) did not significantly differ in degree of gender encoding. These results converge with prior research to suggest that gender diverse children process gender in ways that do not differ from gender conforming children, and provide further evidence that gender encoding may be a common aspect of person perception in societies that support a binary view of gender. 
    more » « less
  2. null (Ed.)
  3. Since the 1970s, advocates have used the termgender neutralto press for legal change in contexts ranging from employment discrimination to marriage equality to public restroom access. Drawing on analyses of all Supreme Court cases, federal courts of appeals cases, and Supreme Court amicus briefs in which the termsgender neutral/neutrality,sex neutral/neutrality, orsexually neutral/sexual neutralityappear, this study examines how US courts have defined gender neutrality and what the scope and limits of its legal application have been. We find that the courts have defined gender neutrality narrowly as facial neutrality, but nonetheless that this limited understanding has transformed some areas of the law, even if it has had little impact on others. Our analysis confirms earlier feminist skepticism about the sufficiency of gender neutrality to guarantee equality but also points to areas in which the law has yet to exploit the idea's significant potential to address discrimination on the basis of sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity. 
    more » « less