skip to main content

Title: Science in action or science inaction? Evaluating the implementation of "best available science” in hydropower relicensing
; ; ;
Award ID(s):
Publication Date:
Journal Name:
Energy Policy
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Computational tools, and the computational thinking (CT) involved in their use, are pervasive in science, supporting and often transforming scientific understanding. Yet, longstanding disparities in access to learning opportunities means that CT’s growing role risks deepening persistent inequities in STEM [2]. To address this problem, our team developed and studied two 10-lesson instructional units for middle school science classrooms, each designed to challenge persistent barriers to equitable participation in STEM. The units aim to position coding as a tool for doing science, and ultimately, encourage a broader range of students, and females in particular, to identify as programmers. Students who participated (n=391) in a recent study of the units demonstrated statistically significant learning gains, as measured on an external assessment of CT. Learning gains were particularly pronounced for female students. Findings suggest that students can develop CT through instruction that foregrounds science, and in ways that lead to more equitable outcomes.
  2. In today’s rapidly evolving career climate, there is an increased need to foster student understanding and appreciation of the scientific method, as well as the higher-order cognitive skills that accompany this process. A partnership with ANP Technologies, a Delaware company that manufactures and produces products relating to environmental monitoring, has led to the development of a classroom-ready educational tool. This module uses a sequence that prompts students to engage, explore, explain, and evaluate while meeting various concepts within the Next Generation Science Standards. Located in Dover, Delaware, Wesley College is a minority-serving liberal arts institution where non-science majors are required to take a topical science course emphasizing scientific literacy. Prior to this project, there was no common instructional tools or assessment between the various class sections. The module developed in this project was piloted in the spring of 2019 along with a post-test to assess module effectiveness and consistency between sections. It was hypothesized that there would be no significant differences between average post-test scores of the different sections following the implementation of the module and that students would achieve proficiency (70% or higher) on at least half of the questions. Results confirmed the consistency between the sections as theremore »were no significant differences in mean post-test score. Students were able to meet threshold on 7 of the 12 questions, suggesting this module could be useful in scientific literacy education.« less