An official website of the United States government
Background: Drivers gather most of the information they need to drive by looking at the world around them and at visual displays within the vehicle. Navigation systems automate the way drivers navigate. In using these systems, drivers offload both tactical (route following) and strategic aspects (route planning) of navigational tasks to the automated SatNav system, freeing up cognitive and attentional resources that can be used in other tasks (Burnett, 2009). Despite the potential benefits and opportunities that navigation systems provide, their use can also be problematic. For example, research suggests that drivers using SatNav do not develop as much environmental spatial knowledge as drivers using paper maps (Waters & Winter, 2011; Parush, Ahuvia, & Erev, 2007). With recent growth and advances of augmented reality (AR) head-up displays (HUDs), there are new opportunities to display navigation information directly within a driver’s forward field of view, allowing them to gather information needed to navigate without looking away from the road. While the technology is promising, the nuances of interface design and its impacts on drivers must be further understood before AR can be widely and safely incorporated into vehicles. Specifically, an impact that warrants investigation is the role of AR HUDS in spatial knowledge acquisition while driving. Acquiring high levels of spatial knowledge is crucial for navigation tasks because individuals who have greater levels of spatial knowledge acquisition are more capable of navigating based on their own internal knowledge (Bolton, Burnett, & Large, 2015). Moreover, the ability to develop an accurate and comprehensive cognitive map acts as a social function in which individuals are able to navigate for others, provide verbal directions and sketch direction maps (Hill, 1987). Given these points, the relationship between spatial knowledge acquisition and novel technologies such as AR HUDs in driving is a relevant topic for investigation. Objectives: This work explored whether providing conformal AR navigational cues improves spatial knowledge acquisition (as compared to traditional HUD visual cues) to assess the plausibility and justification for investment in generating larger FOV AR HUDs with potentially multiple focal planes. Methods: This study employed a 2x2 between-subjects design in which twenty-four participants were counterbalanced by gender. We used a fixed base, medium fidelity driving simulator for where participants drove while navigating with one of two possible HUD interface designs: a world-relative arrow post sign and a screen-relative traditional arrow. During the 10-15 minute drive, participants drove the route and were encouraged to verbally share feedback as they proceeded. After the drive, participants completed a NASA-TLX questionnaire to record their perceived workload. We measured spatial knowledge at two levels: landmark and route knowledge. Landmark knowledge was assessed using an iconic recognition task, while route knowledge was assessed using a scene ordering task. After completion of the study, individuals signed a post-trial consent form and were compensated $10 for their time. Results: NASA-TLX performance subscale ratings revealed that participants felt that they performed better during the world-relative condition but at a higher rate of perceived workload. However, in terms of perceived workload, results suggest there is no significant difference between interface design conditions. Landmark knowledge results suggest that the mean number of remembered scenes among both conditions is statistically similar, indicating participants using both interface designs remembered the same proportion of on-route scenes. Deviance analysis show that only maneuver direction had an influence on landmark knowledge testing performance. Route knowledge results suggest that the proportion of scenes on-route which were correctly sequenced by participants is similar under both conditions. Finally, participants exhibited poorer performance in the route knowledge task as compared to landmark knowledge task (independent of HUD interface design). Conclusions: This study described a driving simulator study which evaluated the head-up provision of two types of AR navigation interface designs. The world-relative condition placed an artificial post sign at the corner of an approaching intersection containing a real landmark. The screen-relative condition displayed turn directions using a screen-fixed traditional arrow located directly ahead of the participant on the right or left side on the HUD. Overall results of this initial study provide evidence that the use of both screen-relative and world-relative AR head-up display interfaces have similar impact on spatial knowledge acquisition and perceived workload while driving. These results contrast a common perspective in the AR community that conformal, world-relative graphics are inherently more effective. This study instead suggests that simple, screen-fixed designs may indeed be effective in certain contexts.
more »
« less
Framing the Scene: An Examination of Augmented Reality Head Worn Displays in Construction Assembly Tasks
The aim of this work is to examine how augmented reality (AR) head worn displays (HWDs) influence worker task performance in comparison to traditional paper blueprints when assembling three various sized wooden frame walls. In our study, 18 participants assembled three different sized frames using one of the three display conditions (conformal AR interface, tag-along AR interface, and paper blueprints). Results indicate that for large frame assembly, the conformal AR interface reduced assembly errors, yet there were no differences in assembly times between display conditions. Additionally, traditional paper blueprints resulted in significantly faster assembly time for small frame assembly.
more »
« less
- Award ID(s):
- 1718051
- PAR ID:
- 10184983
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW)
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 790 to 791
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
null (Ed.)When navigating via car, developing robust mental representations (spatial knowledge) of the environment is crucial in situations where technology fails, or we need to find locations not included in a navigation system’s database. In this work, we present a study that examines how screen-relative and world-relative augmented reality (AR) head-up display interfaces affect drivers’ glance behavior and spatial knowledge acquisition. Results showed that both AR interfaces have similar impact on the levels of spatial knowledge acquired. However, eye-tracking analyses showed fundamental differences in the way participants visually interacted with different AR interfaces; with conformal-graphics demanding more visual attention from drivers.more » « less
-
In this paper, we introduce the Warehouse Augmented Reality Program (WARP), its functionality, practicality, and potential use cases in education. We build this application on the backbone of WebXR. Using this application programming interface (API), we create an interactive web tool that displays a life-sized warehouse in augmented reality (AR) in front of users that can be viewed on a smartphone or a tablet. AR is a technology that displays virtual objects in the real world on a digital device’s screen, allowing users to interact with virtual objects and locations while moving about a real-world environment. This tool can enhance warehousing education by making it immersive and more interactive. In addition, the tool can make warehousing operations more efficient and warehouse design less costly. We highlight how our tool can be applicable and beneficial to education and industry. We demonstrate how this tool can be integrated into a problem-based learning (PBL) assignment about warehouse layout design and order picking. The PBL activity involves comparing two different warehouse layouts (fishbone and traditional) by completing a set of order picking tasks in AR warehouse environments. The task is to perform single item picking over thirty orders and comparing the average order picking time per layout. Then, we use the results of these human subject experiments for validating the realism of the warehouse layouts generated by the tool by comparing the empirical completion times with the analytical results from the literature. We also administer a system usability scale (SUS) survey and collect feedback from industry experts.more » « less
-
Public spaces like concert stadiums and sporting arenas are ideal venues for AR content delivery to crowds of mobile phone users. Unfortunately, these environments tend to be some of the most challenging in terms of lighting and dynamic staging for vision-based relocalization. In this paper, we introduce FLASH 1 , a system for delivering AR content within challenging lighting environments that uses active tags (i.e., blinking) with detectable features from passive tags (quads) for marking regions of interest and determining pose. This combination allows the tags to be detectable from long distances with significantly less computational overhead per frame, making it possible to embed tags in existing video displays like large jumbotrons. To aid in pose acquisition, we implement a gravity-assisted pose solver that removes the ambiguous solutions that are often encountered when trying to localize using standard passive tags. We show that our technique outperforms similarly sized passive tags in terms of range by 20-30% and is fast enough to run at 30 FPS even within a mobile web browser on a smartphone.more » « less
-
Our objective in this research is to compare the usability of three distinct head gaze-based selection methods in an Augmented Reality (AR) hidden object game for children: voice recognition, gesture, and physical button (clicker). Prior work on AR applications in STEM education has focused on how it compares with non-AR methods rather than how children respond to different interaction modalities. We investigated the differences between voice, gesture, and clicker based interaction methods based on the metrics of input errors produced and elapsed time to complete the tutorial and game. We found significant differences in input errors between the voice and gesture conditions, and in elapsed tutorial time between the voice and clicker conditions. We hope to apply the results of our study to improve the interface for AR educational games aimed at children, which could pave the way for greater adoption of AR games in schools.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript1.0
- Conference Paper:
- https://doi.org/10.1109/VRW50115.2020.00246
