- Award ID(s):
- 1842577
- NSF-PAR ID:
- 10185297
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Document Engineering
- Volume:
- 19
- Page Range / eLocation ID:
- 1-10
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
This paper details the development and features of the CNN-corpus in Spanish, possibly the largest test corpus for single document extractive text summarization in the Spanish language. Its current version encompasses 1,117 well-written texts in Spanish, each of them has an abstractive and an extractive summary. The development methodology adopted allows good-quality qualitative and quantitative assessments of summarization strategies for tools developed in the Spanish language.more » « less
-
The DocEng’19 Competition on Extractive Text Summarization assessed the performance of two new and fourteen previously published extractive text sumarization methods. The competitors were evaluated using the CNN-Corpus, the largest test set available today for single document extractive summarization.more » « less
-
Generating a high-quality explainable summary of a multi-review corpus can help people save time in reading the reviews. With natural language processing and text clustering, people can generate both abstractive and extractive summaries on a corpus containing up to 967 product reviews (Moody et al. 2022). However, the overall quality of the summaries needs further improvement. Noticing that online reviews in the corpus come from a diverse population, we take an approach of removing irrelevant human factors through pre-processing. Apply available pre-trained models together with reference based and reference free metrics, we filter out noise in each review automatically prior to summary generation. Our computational experiments evident that one may significantly improve the overall quality of an explainable summary from such a pre-processed corpus than from the original one. It is suggested of applying available high-quality pre-trained tools to filter noises rather than start from scratch. Although this work is on the specific multi-review corpus, the methods and conclusions should be helpful for generating summaries for other multi-review corpora.
-
Carlotta Demeniconi, Ian Davidson: (Ed.)Multi-document summarization, which summarizes a set of documents with a small number of phrases or sentences, provides a concise and critical essence of the documents. Existing multi-document summarization methods ignore the fact that there often exist many relevant documents that provide surrounding background knowledge, which can help generate a salient and discriminative summary for a given set of documents. In this paper, we propose a novel method, SUMDocS (Surrounding-aware Unsupervised Multi-Document Summarization), which incorporates rich surrounding (topically related) documents to help improve the quality of extractive summarization without human supervision. Specifically, we propose a joint optimization algorithm to unify global novelty (i.e., category-level frequent and discriminative), local consistency (i.e., locally frequent, co-occurring), and local saliency (i.e., salient from its surroundings) such that the obtained summary captures the characteristics of the target documents. Extensive experiments on news and scientific domains demonstrate the superior performance of our method when the unlabeled surrounding corpus is utilized.more » « less
-
Extractive summarization is an important natural language processing approach used for document compression, improved reading comprehension, key phrase extraction, indexing, query set generation, and other analytics approaches. Extractive summarization has specific advantages over abstractive summarization in that it preserves style, specific text elements, and compound phrases that might be more directly associated with the text. In this article, the relative effectiveness of extractive summarization is considered on two widely different corpora: (1) a set of works of fiction (100 total, mainly novels) available from Project Gutenberg, and (2) a large set of news articles (3000) for which a ground truthed summarization (gold standard) is provided by the authors of the news articles. Both sets were evaluated using 5 different Python Sumy algorithms and compared to randomly-generated summarizations quantitatively. Two functional approaches to assessing the efficacy of summarization using a query set on both the original documents and their summaries, and using document classification on a 12-class set to compare among different summarization approaches, are introduced. The results, unsurprisingly, show considerable differences consistent with the different nature of these two data sets. The LSA and Luhn summarization approaches were most effective on the database of fiction, while all five summarization approaches were similarly effective on the database of articles. Overall, the Luhn approach was deemed the most generally relevant among those tested.more » « less