skip to main content

Title: Affinity of small-molecule solutes to hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and chemically patterned interfaces in aqueous solution

Performance of membranes for water purification is highly influenced by the interactions of solvated species with membrane surfaces, including surface adsorption of solutes upon fouling. Current efforts toward fouling-resistant membranes often pursue surface hydrophilization, frequently motivated by macroscopic measures of hydrophilicity, because hydrophobicity is thought to increase solute–surface affinity. While this heuristic has driven diverse membrane functionalization strategies, here we build on advances in the theory of hydrophobicity to critically examine the relevance of macroscopic characterizations of solute–surface affinity. Specifically, we use molecular simulations to quantify the affinities to model hydroxyl- and methyl-functionalized surfaces of small, chemically diverse, charge-neutral solutes represented in produced water. We show that surface affinities correlate poorly with two conventional measures of solute hydrophobicity, gas-phase water solubility and oil–water partitioning. Moreover, we find that all solutes show attraction to the hydrophobic surface and most to the hydrophilic one, in contrast to macroscopically based hydrophobicity heuristics. We explain these results by decomposing affinities into direct solute interaction energies (which dominate on hydroxyl surfaces) and water restructuring penalties (which dominate on methyl surfaces). Finally, we use an inverse design algorithm to show how heterogeneous surfaces, with multiple functional groups, can be patterned to manipulate solute affinity and selectivity. more » These findings, importantly based on a range of solute and surface chemistries, illustrate that conventional macroscopic hydrophobicity metrics can fail to predict solute–surface affinity, and that molecular-scale surface chemical patterning significantly influences affinity—suggesting design opportunities for water purification membranes and other engineered interfaces involving aqueous solute–surface interactions.

« less
Authors:
; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
NSF-PAR ID:
10207734
Journal Name:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume:
118
Issue:
1
Page Range or eLocation-ID:
Article No. e2020205118
ISSN:
0027-8424
Publisher:
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Surface polarity plays a key role in controlling molecular adsorption at solid–liquid interfaces, with major implications for reactions and separations. In this study, the chemical composition of periodic mesoporous organosilicas (PMOs) was varied by co-condensing Si(OEt) 4 with organodisilanes, to create a homologous series of materials with similar surface areas, pore volumes, and hydroxyl contents. Their relative surface polarities, obtained by measuring the fluorescence of a solvatochromic dye, cover a wide range. In this series of PMO materials, EPR spectra of tethered nitroxide radicals show monotonically decreasing mobility as larger fractions of the radicals interact strongly with increasingly non-polar surfaces. The surface properties of the materials also correlate with their affinities for organic molecules dissolved in various solvents. The most polar PMO has negligible affinity for phenol, p -cresol, or furfural when these molecules are dissolved in water. However, stronger solute–surface interactions and favor adsorption as the surface polarity decreases. The trend is reversed for furfural in benzene, where weaker solvent–surface interactions result in higher adsorption on polar surfaces. In DMSO, furfural adsorption is suppressed due to the similar strengths of solute-surface and solvent–surface interactions. Thus, the polarity of the surface relative to the solvent is critical for molecular adsorption.more »These findings show how adsorption/desorption can be precisely and systematically tuned by appropriate choice of both solvent and surface, and contribute to a predictive strategy for the design of catalytic and separations processes.« less
  2. The aversion of hydrophobic solutes for water drives diverse interactions and assemblies across materials science, biology, and beyond. Here, we review the theoretical, computational, and experimental developments that underpin a contemporary understanding of hydrophobic effects. We discuss how an understanding of density fluctuations in bulk water can shed light on the fundamental differences in the hydration of molecular and macroscopic solutes; these differences, in turn, explain why hydrophobic interactions become stronger upon increasing temperature. We also illustrate the sensitive dependence of surface hydrophobicity on the chemical and topographical patterns the surface displays, which makes the use of approximate approaches for estimating hydrophobicity particularly challenging. Importantly, the hydrophobicity of complex surfaces, such as those of proteins, which display nanoscale heterogeneity, can nevertheless be characterized using interfacial water density fluctuations; such a characterization also informs protein regions that mediate their interactions. Finally, we build upon an understanding of hydrophobic hydration and the ability to characterize hydrophobicity to inform the context-dependent thermodynamic forces that drive hydrophobic interactions and the desolvation barriers that impede them.
  3. Membrane separations are simple to operate, scalable, versatile, and energy efficient, but their broader use is curtailed by fouling or performance decline due to feed component depositing on the membrane surface. Surface functionalization with groups such as zwitterions can mitigate the adsorption of organic compounds, thus limiting fouling. This can be achieved by using surface-segregating copolymer additives during membrane manufacture, but there is a need for better understanding of how the polymer structure and architecture affect the effectiveness of these additives in improving membrane performance. In this study, we aim to explore the impact of the architecture of zwitterionic copolymer additives for polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF)-based membranes in fouling mitigation and ionic strength response. We prepared membranes from blends of PVDF with zwitterionic (ZI) copolymers with two different architectures, random and comb-shaped. As the random copolymer, we used poly(methyl methacrylate- random- sulfobetaine-2-vinyl pyridine) (PMMA- r -SB2VP) synthesized by free radical polymerization. The comb-shaped copolymer was synthesized by grafting SB2VP side-chains from a PVDF backbone by controlled radical polymerization. Membranes were fabricated from PVDF-copolymer blends containing up to 5 wt% ZI copolymer. Compared to the additive-free PVDF membrane, water permeance increased five-fold with 5 wt% addition of either copolymer. The comb copolymermore »additive led to better resistance to fouling by a saline oil-in-water emulsion and to simulated protein adsorption in Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) force measurements. The additive architecture had a significant influence on how membranes respond to changes in feed salinity, which is known to affect intra- and inter-molecular interactions in zwitterionic polymers. The random copolymer containing membrane showed a small and mostly reversible decrease in its permeance with salinity. In contrast, the comb copolymer-containing membrane underwent a conformational reorganization in saline solutions that leads to an irreversible permeance decrease, increased zwitterionic group content on the membrane surface, and smoother surface topography. The higher mobility of the zwitterionic groups in the comb-shaped architecture facilitates reorganization of the zwitterionic side-chains in response to ionic strength. Overall, this study establishes a new approach for developing highly fouling resistant membranes and defines how the architecture of a zwitterionic copolymer additive impacts the ionic strength response and fouling resistance of the membrane.« less
  4. Energy-efficient desalination and water treatment technologies play a critical role in augmenting freshwater resources without placing an excessive strain on limited energy supplies. By desalinating high-salinity waters using low-grade or waste heat, membrane distillation (MD) has the potential to increase sustainable water production, a key facet of the water-energy nexus. However, despite advances in membrane technology and the development of novel process configurations, the viability of MD as an energy-efficient desalination process remains uncertain. In this review, we examine the key challenges facing MD and explore the opportunities for improving MD membranes and system design. We begin by exploring how the energy efficiency of MD is limited by the thermal separation of water and dissolved solutes. We then assess the performance of MD relative to other desalination processes, including reverse osmosis and multi-effect distillation, comparing various metrics including energy efficiency, energy quality, and susceptibility to fouling. By analyzing the impact of membrane properties on the energy efficiency of an MD desalination system, we demonstrate the importance of maximizing porosity and optimizing thickness to minimize energy consumption. We also show how ineffective heat recovery and temperature polarization can limit the energetic performance of MD and how novel process variants seek tomore »reduce these inefficiencies. Fouling, scaling, and wetting can have a significant detrimental impact on MD performance. We outline how novel membrane designs with special surface wettability and process-based fouling control strategies may bolster membrane and process robustness. Finally, we explore applications where MD may be able to outperform established desalination technologies, increasing water production without consuming large amounts of electrical or high-grade thermal energy. We conclude by discussing the outlook for MD desalination, highlighting challenges and key areas for future research and development.« less
  5. Reduced biofilm formation is highly desirable in applications ranging from transportation to separations and healthcare. Biofilms often form at the three-phase interface where air, liquid, and solid coexist due to the close proximity to nutrients and oxygen. Reducing biofilm formation at the triple interface presents challenges because of the conflicting requirements for hydrophobicity at the air−solid interface (for selfcleaning properties) and for hydrophilicity at the liquid−solid interface (for reduced foulant adhesion). Meeting those needs simultaneously likely entails a dynamic surface, capable of shifting the surface energy landscape in response to wetting conditions and thus enabling hydrophobicity in air and hydrophilicity in water. Here, we designed a facile approach to render existing surfaces resistant to biofilm formation at the triple interface. By adding trace amounts (∼0.1 mM) of surfactants, biofilm formation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (known to form biofilm at the triple interface) was reduced on all surfaces tested, ranging from hydrophilic to hydrophobic, polar to nonpolar. That reduced fouling was not a result of the known antimicrobial effects. Instead, it was attributed to the surface-adsorbed surfactants that dynamically control surface energy at the triple interface. To further understand the effect of surfactant−surface interactions on biofilm reduction, we systematically varied the surfactantmore »charge type and surface properties (surface energy and charge). Electrostatic interactions between surfactants and surfaces were identified as an influential factor when predicting the relative fouling reduction upon introduction of surfactants. Nevertheless, biofilm formation was reduced even on the charge-neutral, fluorinated surface made of poly(1H, 1H, 2H, 2H-perfluorodecyl acrylate) by more than 2-fold simply via adding 0.2 mM dodecyl trimethylammonium chloride or 0.3 mM sodium dodecyl sulfate. Given its robustness, this strategy is broadly applicable for reducing fouling on existing surfaces, which in turn improves the cost-effectiveness of membrane separations and mitigates contaminations and nosocomial infections in healthcare.« less