skip to main content

Attention:

The NSF Public Access Repository (PAR) system and access will be unavailable from 8:00 PM ET on Friday, March 21 until 8:00 AM ET on Saturday, March 22 due to maintenance. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Explore Research Products in the PAR
It may take a few hours for recently added research products to appear in PAR search results.


Title: Predictors of Matriculation in Intended Major in a First-Year Engineering Program
This complete research paper documents how confidence in choice of intended major and self-regulated decision-making competency influence whether a student changes their intended major while participating in a compulsory first-year engineering (FYE) program. Initial major, confidence in that major choice, and self-regulated decision-making competency were documented in the Fall of 2017 for students matriculating into a FYE program. Student enrollment in a major in the Fall of 2018 was connected to this data. Retention in any engineering major and in the student’s intended major were analyzed using logistic regression.  more » « less
Award ID(s):
1745347
PAR ID:
10213520
Author(s) / Creator(s):
; ; ;
Date Published:
Journal Name:
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. ; ; ; ; ; ( , 2019 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE))
    null (Ed.)
    This Full Research Paper discusses ongoing work to develop a survey instrument to reliably assess undergraduate engineering student self-regulated decision-making. This work focuses on a second round of item expansion and refinement to the Decision-Making Competency Inventory (DMCI) to develop items related to learning from past decisions. The refined instrument was distributed to first-year engineering students enrolled in a large, public, land-grant institution located in the southeastern United States in the Fall of 2018. Of the approximately 1,200 students in first-year engineering courses, 883 valid surveys were randomly split into two separate samples for exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). EFA results indicated a viable four-factor solution, which was explored with the CFA. The CFA results also indicated a four-factor model was appropriate. Improving this instrument will help researchers document and understand students’ decision-making skills and how they relate to observed decisions like initial choice of major or change of major. A decision-making instrument will also be valuable in evaluating the effectiveness of interventions to help students build their decision-making competency and make adaptive choices. 
    more » « less
  2. ; ; ( , 2018 First-Year Engineering Experience Conference Proceedings)
    null (Ed.)
    In this work-in-progress study, the engineering identities of students enrolled in a first-year engineering (FYE) program were surveyed to investigate whether students identify with engineering (in general or with a specific engineering major) during their first year and how differences in identities impact intent to persist in engineering. Literature suggests a strong engineering identity is linked to student retention and can positively impact a student’s trajectory within an engineering program. To investigate these interactions, a survey was distributed at a large public institution in the southeast at the beginning and end of the Fall semester. Most students reported they had decided on a specific engineering major even in the beginning of their first engineering course. While students are relatively confident in that major choice at the beginning of the year, their confidence increased by the end of the semester. Future work will invite students for interviews to elucidate understanding in how a student’s views of the engineering profession affect their FYE experience and the role the FYE curriculum has in their anticipated engineering major and themselves as engineers. 
    more » « less
  3. ; ; ; ; ( , Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition)
    The main objective of this project is to help students learn to make decisions that lead to academic success. Our first goal is to map curriculum pathways, which begins by studying overpersistence (when a student persists in a particular major but does not make timely progress toward a degree). We seek to identify curriculum-specific indicators of overpersistence and corresponding alternative paths that could lead to success. Our second goal is to improve the structure of the Decision-Making Competency Inventory (DMCI) so that it can explain student's decision-making competency in more detail and in congruence with the Self-Regulation Model of Decision-Making. This instrument will be used to map decision-making competency to academic choices and outcomes. The third goal is to develop an Academic Dashboard as a means for sharing relevant research results with students. This will allow students to have access to the strategies, information, and stories needed to make and implement adaptive decisions. This paper highlights our progress in the fifth year of the project and our plans going forward. 
    more » « less
  4. ; ; ; ; ( , 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access Proceedings)
    null (Ed.)
    This paper provides a summary activities and accomplishments of an NSF CAREER project, “Empowering Students to be Adaptive Decision-Makers.” We discuss our progress on (1) identifying indicators of poor academic fit in engineering majors; (2) examining relationships between the measures of theoretical constructs (Decision-Making Competency Inventory, DMCI) with the real-world, academic behaviors (major choice and major change); (3) revisions to the DMCI; and (4) development of the Academic Dashboard for putting students in the driver’s seat of their education. A prototype of the Academic Dashboard and its functionality are described. 
    more » « less
  5. ; ; ; ( , 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings)
    null (Ed.)
    This research paper discusses the process of refining and expanding the Decision-Making Competency Inventory developed by Miller and Byrnes. Byrnes is the author of the Self-Regulation Model of Decision-Making (SRMDM), which posits that that self-regulated decision-makers spend time in three phases: generation of options, evaluation of options, and learning from the results. Additionally, adaptive decision-makers are aware of moderating factors (such as stress or lack of information) and work to overcome them. A revised instrument is presented. 
    more » « less
  • Citation Formats
  • MLA
  • APA
  • Chicago
  • BibTeX
  • Save / Share this Record
  • Send to Email