An official website of the United States government
Butterfly color patterns provide visible and biodiverse phenotypic readouts of the patterning processes. While the secreted ligand WntA was shown to instruct the color pattern formation in butterflies, its mode of reception remains elusive. Butterfly genomes encode four homologues of the Frizzled-family of Wnt receptors. Here we show that CRISPR mosaic knock-outs of frizzled2 (fz2) phenocopy the color pattern effects of WntA loss-of-function in multiple nymphalids. While WntA mosaic clones result in intermediate patterns of reduced size, fz2 clones are cell-autonomous, consistent with a morphogen function. Shifts in expression of WntA and fz2 in WntA crispant pupae show that they are under positive and negative feedback, respectively. Fz1 is required for Wnt-independent planar cell polarity (PCP) in the wing epithelium. Fz3 and Fz4 show phenotypes consistent with Wnt competitive-antagonist functions in vein formation (Fz3 and Fz4), wing margin specification (Fz3), and color patterning in the Discalis and Marginal Band Systems (Fz4). Overall, these data show that the WntA/Frizzled2 morphogen-receptor pair forms a signaling axis that instructs butterfly color patterning, and shed light on the functional diversity of insect Frizzled receptors.
more »
« less
Porcupine/Wntless‐dependent trafficking of the conserved WntA ligand in butterflies
Wnt ligands are key signaling molecules in animals, but little is known about the evolutionary dynamics and mode of action of the WntA orthologs, which are not present in the vertebrates or in Drosophila. Here we show that the WntA subfamily evolved at the base of the Bilateria + Cnidaria clade, and conserved the thumb region and Ser209 acylation site present in most other Wnts, suggesting WntA requires the core Wnt secretory pathway. WntA proteins are distinguishable from other Wnts by a synapomorphic Iso/Val/Ala216 amino-acid residue that replaces the otherwise ubiquitous Thr216 position. WntA embryonic expression is conserved between beetles and butterflies, suggesting functionality, but the WntA gene was lost three times within arthropods, in podoplean copepods, in the cyclorrhaphan fly radiation, and in ensiferan crickets and katydids. Finally, CRISPR mosaic knockouts (KOs) of porcupine and wntless phenocopied the pattern-specific effects of WntA KOs in the wings of Vanessa cardui butterflies. These results highlight the molecular conservation of the WntA protein across invertebrates, and imply it functions as a typical Wnt ligand that is acylated and secreted through the Porcupine/Wntless secretory pathway. HIGHLIGHTS - WntA was lost in vertebrates and three arthropod lineages including Drosophila - The WntA thumb region and acylation site are conserved - Disruptions of Porcupine (Porc) and Wntless (Wls) recapitulate WntA knockouts in butterfly wings - WntA requires Porc and Wls for acylation and trafficking
more »
« less
- PAR ID:
- 10232699
- Date Published:
- Journal Name:
- Journal of Experimental Zoology Part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution
- ISSN:
- 1552-5007
- Format(s):
- Medium: X
- Sponsoring Org:
- National Science Foundation
More Like this
-
-
Abstract Background Wnt genes code for ligands that activate signaling pathways during development in Metazoa. Through the canonical Wnt (cWnt) signaling pathway, these genes regulate important processes in bilaterian development, such as establishing the anteroposterior axis and posterior growth. In Arthropoda, Wnt ligands also regulate segment polarity, and outgrowth and patterning of developing appendages. Arthropods are part of a lineage called Panarthropoda that includes Onychophora and Tardigrada. Previous studies revealed potential roles of Wnt genes in regulating posterior growth, segment polarity, and growth and patterning of legs in Onychophora. Unlike most other panarthropods, tardigrades lack posterior growth, but retain segmentation and appendages. Here, we investigated Wnt genes in tardigrades to gain insight into potential roles that these genes play during development of the highly compact and miniaturized tardigrade body plan. Results We analyzed published genomes for two representatives of Tardigrada, Hypsibius exemplaris and Ramazzottius varieornatus . We identified single orthologs of Wnt4 , Wnt5 , Wnt9 , Wnt11 , and WntA , as well as two Wnt16 paralogs in both tardigrade genomes. We only found a Wnt2 ortholog in H. exemplaris . We could not identify orthologs of Wnt1 , Wnt6 , Wnt7 , Wnt8 , or Wnt10 . We identified most other components of cWnt signaling in both tardigrade genomes. However, we were unable to identify an ortholog of arrow / Lrp5/6 , a gene that codes for a Frizzled co-receptor of Wnt ligands. Additionally, we found that some other animals that have lost several Wnt genes and are secondarily miniaturized, like tardigrades, are also missing an ortholog of arrow / Lrp5/6 . We analyzed the embryonic expression patterns of Wnt genes in H. exemplaris during developmental stages that span the establishment of the AP axis through segmentation and leg development. We detected expression of all Wnt genes in H. exemplaris besides one of the Wnt16 paralogs. During embryo elongation, expression of several Wnt genes was restricted to the posterior pole or a region between the anterior and posterior poles. Wnt genes were expressed in distinct patterns during segmentation and development of legs in H. exemplaris , rather than in broadly overlapping patterns. Conclusions Our results indicate that Wnt signaling has been highly modified in Tardigrada. While most components of cWnt signaling are conserved in tardigrades, we conclude that tardigrades have lost Wnt1 , Wnt6 , Wnt7 , Wnt8 , and Wnt10 , along with arrow / Lrp5/6 . Our expression data may indicate a conserved role of Wnt genes in specifying posterior identities during establishment of the AP axis. However, the loss of several Wnt genes and the distinct expression patterns of Wnt genes during segmentation and leg development may indicate that combinatorial interactions among Wnt genes are less important during tardigrade development compared to many other animals. Based on our results, and comparisons to previous studies, we speculate that the loss of several Wnt genes in Tardigrada may be related to a reduced number of cells and simplified development that accompanied miniaturization and anatomical simplification in this lineage.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA , which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species.more » « less
-
Evolutionary variation in the wing pigmentation of butterflies and moths offers striking examples of adaptation by crypsis and mimicry. Thecortexlocus has been independently mapped as the locus controlling color polymorphisms in 15 lepidopteran species, suggesting that it acts as a genomic hotspot for the diversification of wing patterns, but functional validation through protein-coding knockouts has proven difficult to obtain. Our study unveils the role of a long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) which we nameivory, transcribed from thecortexlocus, in modulating color patterning in butterflies. Strikingly,ivoryexpression prefigures most melanic patterns during pupal development, suggesting an early developmental role in specifying scale identity. To test this, we generated CRISPR mosaic knock-outs in five nymphalid butterfly species and show thativorymutagenesis yields transformations of dark pigmented scales into white or light-colored scales. Genotyping ofVanessa carduigermline mutants associates these phenotypes to small on-target deletions at the conserved first exon ofivory. In contrast,cortexgermline mutant butterflies with confirmed null alleles lack any wing phenotype and exclude a color patterning role for this adjacent gene. Overall, these results show that a lncRNA gene acts as a master switch of color pattern specification and played key roles in the adaptive diversification of wing patterns in butterflies.more » « less
-
null (Ed.)Heliconius butterflies have bright patterns on their wings that tell potential predators that they are toxic. As a result, predators learn to avoid eating them. Over time, unrelated species of butterflies have evolved similar patterns to avoid predation through a process known as Müllerian mimicry. Worldwide, there are over 180,000 species of butterflies and moths, most of which have different wing patterns. How do genes create this pattern diversity? And do butterflies use similar genes to create similar wing patterns? One of the genes involved in creating wing patterns is called cortex . This gene has a large region of DNA around it that does not code for proteins, but instead, controls whether cortex is on or off in different parts of the wing. Changes in this non-coding region can act like switches, turning regions of the wing into different colours and creating complex patterns, but it is unclear how these switches have evolved. Butterfly wings get their colour from tiny structures called scales, which each have their own unique set of pigments. In Heliconius butterflies, there are three types of scales: yellow/white scales, black scales, and red/orange/brown scales. Livraghi et al. used a DNA editing technique called CRISPR to find out whether the cortex gene affects scale type. First, Livraghi et al. confirmed that deleting cortex turned black and red scales yellow. Next, they used the same technique to manipulate the non-coding DNA around the cortex gene to see the effect on the wing pattern. This manipulation turned a black-winged butterfly into a butterfly with a yellow wing band, a pattern that occurs naturally in Heliconius butterflies. The next step was to find the mutation responsible for the appearance of yellow wing bands in nature. It turns out that a bit of extra genetic code, derived from so-called ‘jumping genes’, had inserted itself into the non-coding DNA around the cortex gene, ‘flipping’ the switch and leading to the appearance of the yellow scales. Genetic information contains the instructions to generate shape and form in most organisms. These instructions evolve over millions of years, creating everything from bacteria to blue whales. Butterfly wings are visual evidence of evolution, but the way their genes create new patterns isn't specific to butterflies. Understanding wing patterns can help researchers to learn how genetic switches control diversity across other species too.more » « less
- Free Publicly Accessible Full Text
-
Accepted Manuscript
- Journal Article:
- https://doi.org/10.1002/jez.b.23046
