skip to main content


Title: A framework infrageneric classification of Carex (Cyperaceae) and its organizing principles
Abstract

Phylogenetic studies ofCarexL. (Cyperaceae) have consistently demonstrated that most subgenera and sections are para‐ or polyphyletic. Yet, taxonomists continue to use subgenera and sections inCarexclassification. Why? The GlobalCarexGroup (GCG) here takes the position that the historical and continued use of subgenera and sections serves to (i) organize our understanding of lineages inCarex, (ii) create an identification mechanism to break the ~2000 species ofCarexinto manageable groups and stimulate its study, and (iii) provide a framework to recognize morphologically diagnosable lineages withinCarex. Unfortunately, the current understanding of phylogenetic relationships inCarexis not yet sufficient for a global reclassification of the genus within a Linnean infrageneric (sectional) framework. Rather than leavingCarexclassification in its current state, which is misleading and confusing, we here take the intermediate steps of implementing the recently revised subgeneric classification and using a combination of informally named clades and formally named sections to reflect the current state of our knowledge. This hybrid classification framework is presented in an order corresponding to a linear arrangement of the clades on a ladderized phylogeny, largely based on the recent phylogenies published by the GCG. It organizesCarexinto six subgenera, which are, in turn, subdivided into 62 formally named Linnean sections plus 49 informal groups. This framework will serve as a roadmap for research onCarexphylogeny, enabling further development of a complete reclassification by presenting relevant morphological and geographical information on clades where possible and standardizing the use of formal sectional names.

 
more » « less
NSF-PAR ID:
10233380
Author(s) / Creator(s):
;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  more » ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;   « less
Publisher / Repository:
Wiley-Blackwell
Date Published:
Journal Name:
Journal of Systematics and Evolution
Volume:
59
Issue:
4
ISSN:
1674-4918
Page Range / eLocation ID:
p. 726-762
Format(s):
Medium: X
Sponsoring Org:
National Science Foundation
More Like this
  1. Abstract

    The megadiverse genusCarex(c. 2000 species, Cyperaceae) has a nearly cosmopolitan distribution, displaying an inverted latitudinal richness gradient with higher species diversity in cold‐temperate areas of the Northern Hemisphere. Despite great expansion in our knowledge of the phylogenetic history of the genus and many molecular studies focusing on the biogeography of particular groups during the last few decades, a global analysis ofCarexbiogeography and diversification is still lacking. For this purpose, we built the hitherto most comprehensiveCarex‐dated phylogeny based on three markers (ETS–ITS–matK), using a previous phylogenomic Hyb‐Seq framework, and a sampling of two‐thirds of its species and all recognized sections. Ancestral area reconstruction, biogeographic stochastic mapping, and diversification rate analyses were conducted to elucidate macroevolutionary biogeographic and diversification patterns. Our results reveal thatCarexoriginated in the late Eocene in E Asia, where it probably remained until the synchronous diversification of its main subgeneric lineages during the late Oligocene. E Asia is supported as the cradle ofCarexdiversification, as well as a “museum” of extant species diversity. Subsequent “out‐of‐Asia” colonization patterns feature multiple asymmetric dispersals clustered toward present times among the Northern Hemisphere regions, with major regions acting both as source and sink (especially Asia and North America), as well as several independent colonization events of the Southern Hemisphere. We detected 13 notable diversification rate shifts during the last 10 My, including remarkable radiations in North America and New Zealand, which occurred concurrently with the late Neogene global cooling, which suggests that diversification involved the colonization of new areas and expansion into novel areas of niche space.

     
    more » « less
  2. The subphylum Saccharomycotina is a lineage in the fungal phylum Ascomycota that exhibits levels of genomic diversity similar to those of plants and animals. The Saccharomycotina consist of more than 1 200 known species currently divided into 16 families, one order, and one class. Species in this subphylum are ecologically and metabolically diverse and include important opportunistic human pathogens, as well as species important in biotechnological applications. Many traits of biotechnological interest are found in closely related species and often restricted to single phylogenetic clades. However, the biotechnological potential of most yeast species remains unexplored. Although the subphylum Saccharomycotina has much higher rates of genome sequence evolution than its sister subphylum, Pezizomycotina , it contains only one class compared to the 16 classes in Pezizomycotina . The third subphylum of Ascomycota , the Taphrinomycotina , consists of six classes and has approximately 10 times fewer species than the Saccharomycotina . These data indicate that the current classification of all these yeasts into a single class and a single order is an underappreciation of their diversity. Our previous genome-scale phylogenetic analyses showed that the Saccharomycotina contains 12 major and robustly supported phylogenetic clades; seven of these are current families ( Lipomycetaceae , Trigonopsidaceae , Alloascoideaceae , Pichiaceae , Phaffomycetaceae , Saccharomycodaceae , and Saccharomycetaceae ), one comprises two current families ( Dipodascaceae and Trichomonascaceae ), one represents the genus Sporopachydermia , and three represent lineages that differ in their translation of the CUG codon (CUG-Ala, CUG-Ser1, and CUG-Ser2). Using these analyses in combination with relative evolutionary divergence and genome content analyses, we propose an updated classification for the Saccharomycotina , including seven classes and 12 orders that can be diagnosed by genome content. This updated classification is consistent with the high levels of genomic diversity within this subphylum and is necessary to make the higher rank classification of the Saccharomycotina more comparable to that of other fungi, as well as to communicate efficiently on lineages that are not yet formally named. 
    more » « less
  3. Abstract

    Higher-level classifications often must account for monotypic taxa representing depauperate evolutionary lineages and lacking synapomorphies of their better-known, well-defined sister clades. In a ranked (Linnean) or unranked (phylogenetic) classification system, discovering such a depauperate taxon does not necessarily invalidate the rank classification of sister clades. Named higher taxa must be monophyletic to be phylogenetically valid. Ranked taxa above the species level should also maximize information content, diagnosability, and utility (e.g., in biodiversity conservation). In spider classification, families are the highest rank that is systematically catalogued, and incertae sedis is not allowed. Consequently, it is important that family-level taxa be well defined and informative. We revisit the classification problem of Orbipurae, an unranked suprafamilial clade containing the spider families Nephilidae, Phonognathidae, and Araneidae sensu stricto. We argue that, to maximize diagnosability, information content, conservation utility, and practical taxonomic considerations, this “splitting” scheme is superior to its recently proposed alternative, which lumps these families together as Araneidae sensu lato. We propose to redefine Araneidae and recognize a monogeneric spider family, Paraplectanoididae fam. nov. to accommodate the depauperate lineage Paraplectanoides. We present new subgenomic data to stabilize Orbipurae topology which also supports our proposed family-level classification. Our example from spiders demonstrates why classifications must be able to accommodate depauperate evolutionary lineages, for example, Paraplectanoides. Finally, although clade age should not be a criterion to determine rank, other things being equal, comparable ages of similarly ranked taxa do benefit comparative biology. [Classification, family rank, phylogenomics, systematics, monophyly, spider phylogeny.]

     
    more » « less
  4. Abstract

    Spider wasps (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae) cleptoparasites, such asCeropalesLatreille, have evolved the ability to steal the spiders from other pompilids. This behaviour is often observed with morphological adaptations that might mislead taxonomic decisions due to convergence. For instance, four subgenera,BifidoceropalesWolf,Ceropaless. str.,HemiceropalesWolf andPriesneriusMóczár and six species‐groups are recognized withinCeropales; all with doubtful identification. We studied species ofCeropalesin light of molecular and morphological characters to delimit lineages and to test the applicability of morphological traits in diagnosing them. We used the molecular nuclear markers long‐wavelength rhodopsin and 28S ribosomal RNA, and the mitochondrial Cytochrome C Oxidase I available at Genebank to reconstruct Bayesian and maximum likelihood phylogenetic trees. Our results disagree with the current subgeneric classification. We found that fore wing venation and the shape of the female posterior metasomal segments are key characters to differentiate lineages. We discuss morphological evolution of the sting apparatus using ancestral state reconstructions; and we proposeBifidoceropalesas a junior subjective synonym ofCeropaless. str., whereasPriesnerius, stat. resurr. andHemiceropalesare redefined based on male and female morphological traits. This study raises important concerns, from the validity of diagnostic characters currently used to identify cleptoparasite spider wasps—and taxa with habitat constraints leading to homoplasies. Taxonomy can benefit from the reconstruction of ancestral traits by revealing reliable diagnostic characters. Moreover, our investigation provides a framework for evolutionary studies on hymenopteran cleptoparasitoids and sets the basis for future phylogenomic investigations onCeropalesby opening new perspectives for taxonomic acts and guiding taxonomic sampling efforts.

     
    more » « less
  5. Premise of the Study

    This investigation establishes the firstDNA‐sequence‐based phylogenetic hypothesis of species relationships in the coca family (Erythroxylaceae) and presents its implications for the intrageneric taxonomy and neotropical biogeography ofErythroxylum. We also identify the closest wild relatives and evolutionary relationships of the cultivated coca taxa.

    Methods

    We focused our phylogenomic inference on the largest taxonomic section in the genusErythroxylum(ArcherythroxylumO.E.Schulz) using concatenation and gene tree reconciliation methods from hybridization‐based target capture of 427 genes.

    Key Results

    We show that neotropicalErythroxylumare monophyletic within the paleotropical lineages, yetArcherythroxylumand all of the other taxonomic sections from which we sampled multiple species lack monophyly. We mapped phytogeographic states onto the tree and found some concordance between these regions and clades. The wild speciesE. gracilipesandE. cataractarumare most closely related to the cultivatedE. cocaandE. novogranatense, but relationships within this “coca” clade remain equivocal.

    Conclusions

    Our results point to the difficulty of morphology‐based intrageneric classification in this clade and highlight the importance of integrative taxonomy in future systematic revisions. We can confidently identifyE. gracilipesandE. cataractarumas the closest wild relatives of the coca taxa, but understanding the domestication history of this crop will require more thorough phylogeographic analysis.

     
    more » « less